• 265 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 270 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 272 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 275 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 275 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 276 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 278 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 278 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 282 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 282 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 283 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 285 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 286 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 289 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 290 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 290 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 292 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 293 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 296 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 297 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Bonds and Deflation

Below are extracts from a commentary posted at www.speculative-investor.com on20th March 2004.

Overview

Several powerful forces have combined to drive US bond prices higher over the past few years. Chief among these forces has been the large-scale buying of US bonds by the Bank of Japan as part of its attempts to weaken the Yen, but other significant influences include yield-spread trades by banks and speculators, strength in Japanese Government Bonds, 'flight to safety' buying, and fear of deflation. What we want to do today, though, is not spend time analysing WHY the bonds have been so strong because we've covered this topic at length in other commentaries over the past year. Instead, we are going to look at the EFFECTS that this bond strength has had, and continues to have, on other markets.

One of the most important effects of the on-going strength in bonds is psychological because regardless of the fact that much of the strength can be attributed to government intervention (aggressive buying of US bonds by the Japanese central bank and the Fed's implied promise to hold the official short-term rate at a very low level until the employment situation improves), many analysts won't believe that an inflation problem exists until after bond prices move considerably lower. In other words, the consensus view is that if the US really was facing a serious inflation threat then bond prices would be much lower (long-term interest rates would be much higher); and this is despite the mountain of evidence that the on-going bond price strength has nothing to do with inflation/deflation.

Now, the knock-on effect of very few people perceiving an inflation problem is that the problem is able to grow because nobody in power, least of all the governors of the Federal Reserve, is interested in trying to solve a problem that supposedly doesn't exist. That is, persistent strength in bond prices prevents any obstacles from being placed in the way of additional inflation because the bond price strength places a smoke screen in front of the underlying inflation problem. This, in turn, means that the prices of those things that benefit from a burgeoning inflation problem are able to move much higher than would otherwise be possible. So, the longer that bonds can remain firm the higher the prices of gold and commodities will eventually move. By the same token, there won't be any need for us to worry about commodities and gold experiencing anything other than routine bull-market corrections until bond prices move sharply lower.

The problem or the solution?

Over the past few years it has often been necessary to think counter-intuitively in order, firstly, to understand what is happening in the markets and, secondly, to understand the likely future effects of these happenings. For example, during the weeks immediately following the devastating terrorist attacks of 11th September 2001 there was substantial strength in bonds and widespread fear of deflation. Our interpretation, though, was that the policy response to the situation was going to result in an even bigger inflation problem and rally in commodity prices than would otherwise have occurred. But this interpretation seemed so 'off the wall' at the time that several of our readers actually cancelled their subscriptions.

In the last two commentaries we've begun to once again discuss the 'deflation bogey' because there's a reasonable chance that financial-market and economic conditions during the second and third quarters of this year will once again cause deflation to become a hot topic; and we wanted to get in early with our rebuttal. Of course, just because we were right about this issue when deflation fears were rampant during 2001, 2002 and 2003 doesn't mean we will be right this year.

We think it is very likely, though, that the PERCEIVED deflation threat will once again be met by a very aggressive inflationary response on the part of policy-makers. Furthermore, given the Fed's enormous power in the field of money/credit creation there is a high probability that the inflation problem will be made much worse before we have to seriously consider the possibility of genuine deflation. And, if policy-makers are lucky (they will need to be extremely lucky) then their efforts to magnify the existing inflation problem will once again be masked by stability or strength in the bond market.

A point that deserves to be emphasised, though, is that when the Fed and other central banks facilitate the creation of additional money/credit in order to 'address' a perceived deflation threat all they are actually doing is pushing an even bigger problem into the future. This is because deflation isn't the problem; the problem is that way too much new money and new debt has been created over the years. That is, there is an inflation problem and deflation, in fact, is the only viable long-term SOLUTION to the problem.

Further to the above, at the root of the matter is the common misapprehension that deflation is the problem and that inflation might be a solution, or, at least, a 'bandaid' that can be applied in order to make the healing process less painful. In our opinion, though, inflation is the PROBLEM and deflation is the SOLUTION; and the problem will continue to get worse until the political will exists to fix it.

Commodities, Gold and Inflation

Rising commodity prices are a potential EFFECT of inflation, but it is generally possible to explain an increase in commodity prices without naming inflation (money supply growth) as one of the culprits. For example, right now an argument could be made that commodity prices are not strong as a result of inflation but are, instead, strong as a result of China's economic boom, weather-related problems, geopolitical issues and OPEC production cuts.

The ability to blame price rises on anything other than inflation is one of the main reasons that price indices such as the CPI have been aggressively promoted by governments over the decades as measures of inflation; the idea being that as long as most people believe that rising prices and inflation are one and the same then it will be possible to blame "inflation" on things over which the government has no control, such as the weather. So, how would we ever know that inflation was one of the main forces behind a rise in commodity prices?

The answer is: the performance of the gold price. Specifically, when gold leads a large and lengthy rally in commodity prices we can be very confident that one of the major forces behind the rally is inflation. This is because the investment demand for gold only rises when confidence in fiat currency falls.

And gold leadership is exactly what we've seen over the past three years. Note, in particular, that the gold price reached a major bottom (in real terms) in February of 2001 and had been rallying for 8 months by the time the CRB Index hit a major bottom of its own. We can therefore be very confident that inflation has played an important part in the rally in commodity prices that began in October-2001

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment