• 338 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 339 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 340 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 740 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 745 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 747 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 750 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 750 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 751 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 753 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 753 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 757 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 757 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 758 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 760 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 761 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 764 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 765 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 765 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 767 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Census: A Little Too Personal

Last week Congress voted to encourage participation in the 2010 census. I voted "No" on this resolution for the simple, obvious reason that the census- like so many government programs- has grown far beyond what the framers of our Constitution intended. The invasive nature of the current census raises serious questions about how and why government will use the collected information. It also demonstrates how the federal bureaucracy consistently encourages citizens to think of themselves in terms of groups, rather than as individual Americans. The not so subtle implication is that each group, whether ethnic, religious, social, or geographic, should speak up and demand its "fair share" of federal largesse.

Article I, section 2 of the Constitution calls for an enumeration of citizens every ten years, for the purpose of apportioning congressional seats among the various states. In other words, the census should be nothing more than a headcount. It was never intended to serve as a vehicle for gathering personal information on citizens.

But our voracious federal government thrives on collecting information. In fact, to prepare for the 2010 census state employees recorded GPS coordinates for every front door in the United States so they could locate individuals with greater accuracy! Once duly located, individuals are asked detailed questions concerning their name, address, race, home ownership, and whether they periodically spend time in prison or a nursing home - just to name a few examples.

From a constitutional perspective, of course, the answer to each of these questions is: "None of your business." But the bigger question is - why government is so intent on compiling this information in the first place?

The Census Bureau claims that collected information is not shared with any federal agency; but rather is kept under lock and key for 72 years. It also claims that no information provided to census takers can be used against you by the government.

However, these promises can and have been abused in the past. Census data has been used to locate men who had not registered for the draft. Census data also was used to find Japanese-Americans for internment camps during World War II. Furthermore, the IRS has applied census information to detect alleged tax evaders. Some local governments even have used census data to check for compliance with zoning regulations.

It is not hard to imagine that information compiled by the census could be used against people in the future, despite claims to the contrary and the best intentions of those currently in charge of the Census Bureau. The government can and does change its mind about these things, and people have a right to be skeptical about government promises.

Yet there are consequences for not submitting to the census and its intrusive questions. If the form is not mailed back in time, households will experience the "pleasure" of a visit by a government worker asking the questions in person. If the government still does not get the information it wants, it can issue a fine of up to $5000.

If the federal government really wants to increase compliance with the census, it should abide by the Constitution and limit its inquiry to one simple question: How many people live here?

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment