• 777 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 777 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 779 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,179 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,183 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,185 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,188 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,189 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,190 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,191 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,192 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,196 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,196 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,197 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,199 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,199 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,203 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,203 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,204 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,206 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

If This Were A Stock....

See figure 1 a weekly price chart. The 40 week moving average (i.e, red line) is heading higher, and prices are trading above key pivot points, which are areas of support (buying) and resistance (selling). In essence, this is a "beautiful" chart with lots of momentum (i.e., note the breakout gaps). If this were a stock, the analysts and pundits would be all over the "breakout" ---blah, blah, blah.

Figure 1. Price Chart/ weekly
Inverted Price Chart

But figure 1 isn't a stock, it is the yield on the 30 year Treasury, and the chart has been turned upside down. What I hear and read is this move in Treasury bonds isn't sustainable. A sub 3% yield isn't possible, but isn't that what "they" said about a sub 4% yield? Which happens to be in the rear view mirror.

People still don't believe, and they are not interpreting the significance of the price action correctly. Maybe if this were a stock people would be wowed by the price action. But they aren't. For the record, figure 2 is a weekly chart of the yield on the 30 year Treasury bond (symbol: $TYX.X). Are the low yields of late 2008 the next stop?

Figure 2. $TYX.X/ weekly
TYX.X Weekly Chart

In up coming commentaries, I will have more on why I think this move is even more sustainable than most analysts are currently anticipating. I last wrote about this secular theme on July 8, 2010: "The Case For Treasury Bonds".

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment