"No warning can save people determined to grow suddently rich" - Lord Overstone

  • 1 hour Is This The Death Of The iPhone X?
  • 2 hours Is London Still The Financial Capital Of The World?
  • 3 hours Is Gold Staging A Comeback?
  • 4 hours The $200 Million ‘Golden Parachute’ For Rupert Murdoch
  • 5 hours Bitcoin’s Breakout Is Not As Bullish As it Seems
  • 7 hours Farmers On Edge As Trade War Hits U.S. Grain Shipments
  • 9 hours Is Silver Poised For A Massive Break Out?
  • 1 day Meet The Hedge Fund Billionaires Club
  • 1 day The Next Housing Crisis Could Be Right Around The Corner
  • 1 day Cartel's, Pirates And Corruption Cost Mexico $1.6 Billion Per Year
  • 1 day Africa’s Fastest Growing Economy
  • 1 day The Blockchain Boom Hits The Utilities Sector
  • 1 day Why Smart Money Is Selling Off Right Before The Bell
  • 1 day Tech Giants Rally Ahead Of Earnings Reports
  • 2 days Global Debt Hits 225% Of GDP
  • 2 days The World’s First Trillionaire Will Be A Space Miner
  • 2 days How Student Debt Could Cause The Next Real Estate Crisis
  • 2 days This $550 Billion Industry Is Betting On Bitcoin
  • 2 days One Commodity Set To Soar On Russian Sanctions
  • 2 days China’s New Car-Market Rules
Is This The Death Of The iPhone X?

Is This The Death Of The iPhone X?

Apple’s stock has slipped more…

What's The Message?

Market analysis doesn't need to be too complicated to be good, and probably simpler is better. Heck, we have just spent the past 12 months listening to every analyst, commentator and pundit under the sun tell us why this market is the buy of the century, and when I look at the numbers, I note the S&P500 is up only 3.68% over the past 52 weeks. That's a lot of verbage for so little beef. If you have been holding the S&P500 for 52 weeks, you have made 3.68% on your money. That's a fact, not an opinion.

So what's the message here? Simply stated, a market that has gone nowhere for the past 52 weeks is at risk for lower prices. Just take a 52 week rate of change indicator and slap it on any chart and see what I am talking about. It really is that simple. Now this isn't meant to show you some "holy grail" type of indicator that will have you buying at the exact bottom tick. This isn't the purpose of my analysis. But the important point is this: once the 52 week rate of change turns negative - that is, your investment is underwater from a year ago - the 52 week rate of change tends to stay negative for a long while.

Figure 1 is a weekly chart of the S&P500 (symbol: $INX). The 52 week rate of change indicator is in the bottom panel. The current value is above the zero line. The thick vertical lines identify those times (in recent market history) when the 52 week rate of change turned negative. The dashed vertical lines identify times when the indicator got below 1% (but did not turn negative), and these were very good buying points during the bull market seen during the middle part of the decade.

Figure 1. $INX/ weekly

$INX/ weekly

Once again, we aren't establishing a "buy signal" or "sell signal" but showing you that once the 52 week rate of change turns negative it tends to stay that way for awhile. But let's look at this notion a little more closely, and to do this I am going to introduce an indicator that counts the number of weeks that the 52 week rate of change is negative. This is the indicator in the lower panel of figure 2, a weekly chart. So when the 52 week rate of change first turns negative, the indicator changes from blue to red. Figure 2 is from 1987 to the present, and the indicator has turned from blue to red 5 times (see vertical bars on figure). What is surprising is that in 4 of those instances the indicator rose continuously for greater than 20 weeks.

Figure 2. $INX/ weekly
$INX/ weekly

So what can we draw from these observations? Once a trend is started -i.e., lower prices in this case as the 52 rate of change has turned negative - it tends to persist.

Figure3 shows the S&P500 from 1966 to 1987, and our indicator is in the bottom panel. The indicator has gone from blue to red 8 times. In 6 instances, the persistence of the trend is noteworthy; the indicator continued to rise because prices went lower or sideways.

Figure 3. $INX/ weekly
$INX/ weekly

So why is this relevant since the S&P500 is 3.68% above the zero line? Well let's look at some sector ETF charts, like the S&P Select Financial Spdr Fund (symbol: XLF) and the Semiconductor Holders (symbol: SMH) --everyone's two favorite proxies of market health. Figure 3 is a weekly chart of XLF with our indicator that looks at persistence of the down trend in the 52 week rate of change. Figure 4 is a weekly chart of SMH.

Figure 4. XLF/ weekly
XLF / weekly

Figure 5. SMH/ weekly
SMH/ weekly

What we notice that the indicator in both SMH and XLF has started to rise as the 52 week rate of change has turned negative. For the most part, past instances where the 52 week rate of change has turned have persisted, and I don't see any reason why this time should be different.

So what's the message? Sometimes simpler is better. Trends tend to persist. Market tops are really about time.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment