• 552 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 552 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 554 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 954 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 959 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 961 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 964 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 964 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 965 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 967 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 967 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 971 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 971 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 972 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 974 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 975 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 978 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 979 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 979 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 981 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Economic Optimism Warranted Or Not

"Things are not always what they seem; the first appearance deceives many; the intelligence of a few perceives what has been carefully hidden" - Author unknown

Recent economic data has surprised to the upside and once again hope springs eternal. Like a school of bait fish many economists and market pundits seem to be reversing course scrambling to highlight the positives in the economy while ignoring the structural problems that still exist.

I caution against taking the easy road and simply accepting this renewed optimism at face value for two reasons.

The first reason is probably the most blatant argument one could make against the quality of the current economic recovery. The consumer price index (CPI) has averaged approximately 3.5% on a rolling 12 month basis in 2011. The price deflator though which is used to inflation adjust nominal GDP into real GDP has been 2.5%. In other words the BEA estimates inflation a full percentage point below CPI. Considering GDP through 2011 has averaged .8% there's your entire "economic recovery."

I will ignore that argument though because I am sure an academic can "explain" why the two measures of inflation are different yet correct. Talk about irony though as the Fed fears the effects of deflation the BEA finds it very useful. The second reason is far more compelling. We have been here before.

In the summer of 2008 market chatter was all about goldilocks and the Fed adjusting monetary policy just enough to manage a soft landing. Like a plane practicing touch and goes the US economy would skip right off the runaway and back into a normal flight path. The data was supporting this argument.

On July 31, 2008 the first estimate of Q2 GDP was 1.9% up from 0.9% in Q1 2008 while unemployment averaged 5.8% throughout the summer. Far from a recessionary outlook and certainly not what one would expect as a precursor to the "Great Recession." Then a shock event came, subprime MBS affected the quality of collateral in the repo market and overnight liquidity disappeared.

Three months later the first estimate of Q3 2008 GDP contracted (0.3%) later revised to contract at (3.99%) and (6.78%) in Q4. So much for goldilocks and monetary policy getting it just right.

GDP 2007-2008

Fast forward just three years and once again the economy is teetering on expansion or contraction. Goldilocks has been replaced with "transitory soft patch" and a new shock event has hit the global economy. Sovereign debt has replaced subprime MBS. For those who think this is a European problem explain why MF Global (how fitting global is in the name) is the first and so far only bankruptcy from a "European problem."

I won't go into the mechanics of how a freeze in liquidity can turn a global economy on a dime as it did in 2008. In 2008 the threat was a run on the banks. In 2011 the banks themselves are now causing their own "bank run." This time on sovereign debt.

Europe arguably has already entered recession. The US consumer has pushed their savings rate to 3.6% from 5.3% in just three months and at levels last seen in December 2007. The inventory build cycle which drove economic growth has come to an end and contracted in September. Most alarming though was the words of Eric Rosengren, Boston Fed President during a speech November 16 when he was quoted "Crisis might warrant coordinated action by Fed, ECB."

So whether it is the "deflated" price deflator or the liquidity crunch facing the global economy I believe history will once again show the current state of economic optimism to be completely misguided. Question what you are being told and don't be deceived by first appearances.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment