• 509 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 510 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 511 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 911 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 916 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 918 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 921 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 921 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 922 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 924 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 924 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 928 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 928 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 929 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 931 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 932 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 935 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 936 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 936 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 938 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Employment (Tweets and Further Detail)

  • Employment Report: Unemp Rate up to 7.923% from 7.849% - the consumer confidence report was the hint that'd happen.
  • Always hard to look at the January Payrolls report especially. In addition to rockin seasonals, you get prior yr revisions.
  • Avg Hourly Earnings +2.1% y/y, faster than any time in 2012. Wages lag inflation so this will be higher than this at year-end.
  • ...the bad news is that aggregate inflation will be higher as well.
  • So after the benchmark revisions, avg 2011 payrolls gain was 153k. For 2012: 156k. Today: 157k. Nice stimulus.
  • Nearly 5 years after the recession started, "Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now" still near the highs.

Here is the BLS chart on the "Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now" series.

BLS chart on the "Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now" series

And here is a chart (Source: BLS, Bloomberg) showing the trailing 12-months deficit (represented positive) versus Payrolls. You can see why there's some reason to think the massive spending (blue line) curtailed further job losses in the recession, although it's important to remember that we don't know the counterfactual...that is, what would have happened in the absence of spending.

the trailing 12-months deficit (represented positive) versus Payrolls

The graph does not imply that if the government had not run a huge deficit that we would have had continuing job losses, even though that is the tale our elected representatives would like you to believe. Indeed, look at the next chart, which shows the level of the deficit versus the 12-month acceleration/deceleration in job growth, lagged 12 months.

level of the deficit versus the 12-month acceleration/deceleration in job growth, lagged 12 months

If there seems to be a correlation between big deficits and job market acceleration, it comes mainly from the big swings associated with the teeth of the crisis when the causality may have been going either direction. Take out that big "S" and you have similar jobs growth with huge government and with small government (and you can see that same fact on the prior chart).

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment