• 149 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 154 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 156 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 159 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 159 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 160 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 162 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 162 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 166 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 166 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 167 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 170 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 170 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 173 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 174 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 174 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 176 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 177 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 180 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 181 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Plasma Televisions are not Buggy Whips

Last week, on my second appearance on CNBC's Squawk Box, host Mark Haines mischaracterized my position that the U.S. could not hope to pay for imports solely through reliance on the service sector, as my advocating that the U.S. return to the equivalent of a "Buggy Whip" economy. (His analogy is a reference to the classic economic example of "creative destruction," whereby the invention of a new technology, in this case the automobile, results in the displacement of a mature industry, in this case manufacturers of whips for horse-drawn buggies.)

However, as Mark should have realized, this concept has no relevance whatsoever to America's current abandonment of manufacturing. When buggy whip companies went out of business, America did not start importing foreign made buggy whips. America stopped making buggy whips because people no longer needed them!

Today, the very same highly desirable, state-of-the-art, consumer goods that were formerly produced in America are now being produced abroad. That's a big difference between the creative destruction of manufacturers of obsolete buggy whips being supplanted by manufacturers of innovative automotive supplies. Today's example is pure destruction, with nothing being created.

For all of the worship that many analysts like Haines shower on the supremacy of the "information economy," the fact remains that what Americans really want are cars, boats, consumer electronics, clothing, furniture, appliances, toys, etc. If we do not produce these products ourselves, and do not produce enough exportable services to acquire them through trade, soon we will have to live without them. Today we are able to acquiring such goods through debt. We issue our trading partners interest baring IOU's, which means that we are not really paying for our imports. We are putting them on the equivalent of a national credit card, with the final payment still due.

The position that we can pay for our imports with services alone is completely contradicted by the facts. A $60 billion dollar per month, rapidly growing, no end in sight, trade deficit, proves that we are not producing enough exportable services to pay for our growing imports.

Similarly, Haines' assertion that the U.S. manufacturing sector can no longer compete with the low wages in China is equally absurd. In the first place, during the 1940s though the 1970s, the U.S. ran consistent trade surpluses in manufactured goods despite paying the highest wages in the world. Today, despite having a higher wage scale than the U.S., Japan enjoys a surplus in manufactured goods, including a surplus with China.

This is because manufacturing is not a function of cheap labor. If it were Africa would certainly be the manufacturing center of the world. Manufacturing is a function of capital formation, which requires savings, and freedom, which necessitates low taxes and the absence of burdensome regulations. So the real reason for America's lack of manufacturing competitive is not that Americans are paid too much, but that we save too little, and are taxed and regulated too much.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment