• 681 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 681 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 683 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,083 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,087 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,089 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,092 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,093 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,094 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,095 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,096 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,099 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,100 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,100 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,103 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,103 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,106 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,107 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,107 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,109 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Beyond all Doubt

I have two pieces of good news this week (for bears).

  1. You will never again have to read about how the 2011 sideways movement has caused confusion over from which date to count the last basic advance in the 2009 bull market.
  2. Even if the sideways movement confusion had not been resolved previously, time has taken care of the any lingering uncertainties.

The last several months have been spent agonizing over from which low in the 2011 sideways movement to count the current basic advance. By using Lindsay's standard time spans we can dramatically narrow down the time period in which to expect highs and lows but we have to know from which low to begin counting (it's not always the lowest low).

Sideways movements are typically topping formations. When Lindsay wrote his explanation of why he chose the low in January 1927 to count the next basic advance from the 1926-1927 sideways movement it was only the second time in history to see a rally (rather than a decline) from this pattern and his reasons were less than specific. It was only after spending the last several months reviewing all the basic declines over the entire history of the Dow that I was satisfied that the low on 11/25/11 was the correct point of origin. But there was always that lingering fear. True, the Lindsay forecast for a top in the Dow (7/17/14) was off by only one day (the closing high was on 7/16/14) but what if the low on 12/19/11 was the correct date to count from? That would allow the basic advance to extend past the July high.

Any high must occur within a standard time span. The longest possible basic advance (929-968 days) from 12/19/11 expired on 8/13/14 and all the other, shorter time spans have expired too. The high on 7/16/14, at 964 days from the low on 11/25/11 was, beyond all doubt, the high of the 2009 bull market.


Larger Image

 


Get your copy of the September Lindsay Report at SeattleTA.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment