• 527 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 527 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 529 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 929 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 933 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 935 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 938 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 939 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 940 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 941 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 942 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 946 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 946 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 947 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 949 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 949 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 953 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 953 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 954 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 956 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Reflections on Central Banking

Following are some comments made by Greenspan at a symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming August 26, 2005. The subject matter of Greenspan's speech was "Reflections on Central Banking". Here are some of the highlights:

"History has not dealt kindly with the aftermath of protracted periods of low risk premiums"

"Any onset of increased investor caution elevates risk premiums and, as a consequence, lowers asset values and promotes the liquidation of the debt that supported higher prices"

"Given our inevitably incomplete knowledge about key structural aspects of an ever-changing economy and the sometimes asymmetric costs or benefits of particular outcomes, the paradigm on which we have settled has come to involve, at its core, crucial elements of risk management. In this approach, a central bank needs to consider not only the most likely future path for the economy but also the distribution of possible outcomes about that path. The decision makers then need to reach a judgment about the probabilities, costs, and benefits of various possible outcomes under alternative choices for policy."

"The structure of our economy will doubtless change in the years ahead. In particular, our analysis of economic developments almost surely will need to deal in greater detail with balance sheet considerations than was the case in the earlier decades of the postwar period."

Mish has some questions for Mr. Greenspan and the FED.

  1. The FED was created in 1913 supposedly to steer the economy in the right direction. It did not do a very good job in the late 20's and early 30's did it?
  2. Given your admission that the "economy will doubtless change" in the years ahead, why do you foolishly think you can guide the economy down the correct path, when you have blown the two largest bubbles in history?
  3. Given your admission of "inevitably incomplete knowledge about key structural aspects of an ever-changing economy" just why the hell do you think the FED can steer the economy better than the market can?
  4. Given your obviously bad track record, why shouldn't you abolish yourselves?

By the way, here is the complete text of Greenspan's speech. Given that the complete text is lengthy and generally boring save a few key quotes for everyone to ponder, I am pleased to offer this fine translation by Ramsey Su on Silicon Investor.

For 18 years, the Feds led be me, the supreme highness of the universe, did not have a clue what we were doing. So we think the economy is zigging so we zigged faster. As it turned out, the economy is really zagging so we zagged. In the end, we just decided to roll up all those zig-zag reports and had one hell of a smoke. Now that the party is over, it is time for me to get the hell out of here and let someone else clean up my mess.

There you have it. That is what Greenspan really meant to say.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment