• 3 hours Commodities Are Having A Stellar Year
  • 19 hours Bezos’ Next Big Project Could Be Worth $100 Billion Per Year
  • 21 hours 3,600 Years Later, Climate Change Turns Mammoths Into $40M Market
  • 1 day Tesla, Apple Claim China Is Stealing Intellectual Property
  • 1 day EV Giants Duke It Out For Battery Dominance
  • 2 days Tech Billionaire Takes Aim At Google
  • 2 days Chinese Police Bust Largest Ever Illicit Crypto Mining Operation
  • 2 days Expect A Pullback Before Gold's Next Major Rally
  • 2 days Why Interest On Gold Matters
  • 3 days Ten Extravagant Food Items For The Wealthy Only
  • 3 days Why Saudi Arabia Won't Give Up On The Aramco IPO
  • 4 days $32 Million Crypto Heist Halts Tokyo Exchange
  • 4 days Is A Gold Selloff Looming?
  • 5 days Central Banks Are Stashing Gold And Dumping Treasuries
  • 5 days Three Cannabis Trends Flying Under Investors’ Radars
  • 6 days $1.3 Billion In Cocaine Found On JPMorgan Vessel
  • 6 days Amazon Teams Up With Lady Gaga To Win Over Generation Z
  • 6 days Dollar Falls As Powell Teases Rate Cuts
  • 6 days Will The World's First Trillion Dollar Company Ever Bounce Back?
  • 7 days Mozilla vs DarkMatter: The Cyber Espionage End Game
The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

John Rubino

John Rubino

John Rubino edits DollarCollapse.com and has authored or co-authored five books, including The Money Bubble: What To Do Before It Pops, Clean Money: Picking Winners…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

2007 All Over Again? Mega-Merger Edition

Intel is buying chip maker Altera. Charter is buying Time Warner Cable. All the big drug makers are buying all the mediums-sized ones.

Great news, right? If these huge companies with their top-of-the-line analytical tools and deep insight into their markets think paying way up to build empires is wise, then the stock market, far from being overvalued, must be cheap.

Right. Except that history says the opposite. One of the best signals that a bubble is about to burst is rich people with too much money doing stupid things. And as Mitt Romney likes to say, corporations are people too -- which means they're prone to exactly this kind of herd behavior.

For proof of this you need only recall the last bubble, when household name companies were buying out their peers with abandon (i.e., with hundreds of billions of dollars of other people's money). Giants like Amro Holding NV, Equity Office Properties, and Alcan Aluminum, among many, many others were all merged into global multinationals at prices that seemed to imply blindingly-bright futures for their industries. (A complete, shockingly-long list of the acquisitions attempted and/or completed in 2007 is available here.)

As it turned out, these were terrible deals for everyone except the CEOs of the takeover targets, who got to leave at the top. And 2007 was par for the course; the same thing happened at the peak of the tech stock and junk bond bubbles. Seen through this historical lens, today's orgy of takeovers at record-high prices implies at least two things:

  • Corporations have copious free cash, due mostly to their ability to borrow at historically low interest rates, but relatively few opportunities to build value by turning that cash into new factories. So instead they choose to "rationalize" their industries by buying up the competition, closing redundant factories, laying off unneeded workers and hoping that the sum ends up being more valuable than the parts. The immediate result, however, is fewer workers with good jobs, lower growth for the economy as a whole, and therefore falling sales for those newly-rationalized industries.

  • Corporate CEOs are tired of the drudgery of actually running a business and have grown cocky after years of rising share prices. Combine these two attitudes with the afore-mentioned easy money and you get empire building. In other words, today's buyers are thinking mainly about future cocktail parties and industry conventions where they'll be treated like royalty. Shareholder value is taken for granted (because stock prices always go up, right?). The inevitable result is a string of deals done at prices that look insanely inflated a few years hence.

So is this 2007 (or 1999 or 1988) all over again? That won't be clear until the cycle turns, but if this isn't 2007, it's damn close.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment