• 16 hours 3 Restaurant Stocks In Full Recovery Mode
  • 24 hours Bitcoin Is Driven By Testosterone
  • 6 days Quantum Computing Is The Newest Megatrend In Silicon Valley
  • 7 days How To Invest In The Cybersecurity Boom
  • 9 days Investors Are Patient With Unprofitable Giants
  • 11 days Wells Fargo Back In The Scandal Spotlight Once Again
  • 13 days 5 Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On This Year
  • 14 days As Auto Giants Flail, Look To Chip Stocks For Gains
  • 15 days Central America Is Ready For The Bitcoin Hustle
  • 17 days China’s Video Game Restrictions Unlikely To Slow Down Booming Industry
  • 18 days Top Performing Stocks As Inflation Fears Grow
  • 19 days US Airline Stocks Take A Beating On New EU Restrictions
  • 20 days This IPO Could Open Sustainable Fashion Floodgates
  • 21 days Crypto Crime Nets Another $2B Fraudster
  • 23 days This Week’s Hottest Meme Stocks
  • 24 days Why World Markets Should Be Watching Germany Closely
  • 26 days Could ‘Cultured’ Meat Rival The Plant-Based Megatrend?
  • 28 days ‘Easy Money’: Crypto Is Still Attracting Newbie Investors
  • 30 days Foreign Syndicates May Have Stolen Up To $400B In COVID Benefits
  • 31 days Gold Jumps Above $1800 Ahead Of Jackson Hole Summit
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Nouriel Roubini: 'Positive Impacts of Paris Attacks Modest Unless More Attacks Follow'

Economic stupidity permeates from every mainstream media corner in a myriad of ways.

I typically expect economic stupidly, and stupidity certainly has provided endless things for me to write about.

Nonetheless, I am somewhat surprised that renowned economist Noutiel Rounbini would actually say Paris Attacks Could Boost the Eurozone Economy.

Economist Nouriel Roubini said Tuesday the Paris attacks could end up boosting the eurozone economy if the European Central Bank decides to increase its program of monetary stimulus by a larger margin than it would have otherwise. In an interview with CNBC, the founder of Roubini Global Economics said the [positive] impact of the attacks would otherwise be 'modest', unless more follow.


Thoroughly Discredited Idea

In context, the word "positive" is implied.

The notion disasters cause positive economic activity was thoroughly discredited over two centuries ago.

Ironically, the best debunking ever came from France. French political economist, Frederic Bastiat's 1850 essay, "That Which is Seen, and That Which is Unseen" provides the debunking.

Bastiat tells the story of a shopkeeper who has to hire a glazier to repair a broken window, providing work and income for the glazier in the process. That's what is seen.

What is unseen is what the shopkeeper would have done if he didn't have to pay the glazier. He might have bought shoes for his children, providing income for the shoemaker, who in turn could buy leather to produce more shoes.


Economic Reality

There is never any benefit to the destruction of productive assets. Money used on repairs could otherwise have been put to much more productive use.

If Roubini truly believes there is any economic benefit to disasters he is a Nobel-prize winning Keynesian-economist fool.

If he believes the government response could artificially add to French GDP now, while subtracting even more from future GDP, then I sympathize somewhat. But that is not how MarketWatch quoted him.

Moreover, his analysis that benefits would be "modest" unless "more" attacks follow fails to take into account the inevitable decline in business and consumer spending that would undoubtedly occur in the wake of more attacks.

In short, Roubini blew it from multiple angles.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment