• 14 hours The Coronavirus Is Crushing China’s Car Market
  • 2 days Fighting For Survival In The Streaming War
  • 2 days Want A Job? Forget About A Bachelor’s Degree
  • 3 days Another Major Car Maker Is Backing Hydrogen
  • 3 days Are Americans Finally Sold On Soccer?
  • 4 days Is The Tech Bubble About To Burst?
  • 4 days Coronavirus Could Cost Tourism Industry $80 Billion
  • 5 days What Web Traffic Trends Can Tell Us About The World
  • 5 days Miners Face Greater Headwinds
  • 5 days Boris Johnson Proposes Billion Dollar Bridge To Northern Ireland
  • 7 days Goldman Slashes Oil Price Forecast By $10
  • 8 days Tesla Raises $2 Billion In Share Selloff
  • 8 days What The T-Mobile Takeover Of Sprint Really Means For Markets
  • 9 days The U.S. Has Charged Huawei With Racketeering And Conspiracy
  • 9 days How Hydrogen Could Become The Fuel Of The Future
  • 9 days Millennials Can’t Retire, But They’ll Still Have To Help Their Parents
  • 10 days This Gold Miner Just Increased Its Dividends By 40%
  • 10 days Airbnb IPO Under Threat As China's Economy Drags
  • 10 days The Infamous Equifax Hack Just Became A National Security Issue
  • 11 days BHP Takes The Crown As World’s Top Copper Miner
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Who Should Pay For The Syrian Refugees?

Last week the US House dealt a blow to President Obama's plan to resettle 10,000 Syrians fleeing their war-torn homeland. On a vote of 289-137, including 47 Democrats, the House voted to require the FBI to closely vet any applicant from Syria and to guarantee that none of them pose a threat to the US. Effectively this will shut down the program.

The House legislation was brought to the Floor after last week's attacks in Paris that left more than 120 people dead, and for which ISIS claimed responsibility. With the year-long US bombing campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, there is a good deal of concern that among those 10,000 to be settled here there might be some who wish to do us harm. Even though it looks as though the Paris attackers were all EU citizens, polling in the US shows record opposition to allowing Syrian refugees entry.

I agree that we must be very careful about who is permitted to enter the United States, but I object to the president's plan for a very different reason. I think it is a sign of Washington's moral and intellectual bankruptcy that US citizens are being forced to pay for those fleeing Washington's foreign policy.

For the past ten years the US government has been planning and executing a regime change operation against the Syrian government. It is this policy that has produced the chaos in Syria, including the rise of ISIS and al-Qaeda in the country. After a decade of US destabilization efforts, we are now told that Syria is totally destabilized and we therefore must take in thousands of Syrians fleeing the destabilization that Washington caused.

Has there ever been a more foolish and wrong-headed foreign policy than this?

The American people have been forced to pay untold millions for a ten-year CIA and Pentagon program to undermine and overthrow the Syrian government, and now we are supposed to pay millions more to provide welfare for the refugees Obama created.

Who should pay for the millions fleeing the chaos that Washington helped create? How about the military-industrial complex, which makes a killing promoting killing? How about the Beltway neocon think-tanks that continue to churn out pro-war propaganda while receiving huge grants from defense contractors? How about President Obama's national security advisors, who push him into one regime change disaster after another? How about Hillary Clinton, who came up with the bright idea that "Assad must go"? How about President Obama himself, a president elected to end wars, but who has ended up starting more wars than his predecessor? It's time those who start the wars start paying for the disasters they create. Then perhaps we might have some relief from an interventionist foreign policy that is destroying our financial and national security.

If Obama wants to take in refugees from the chaos in Syria, there are probably plenty of vacant rooms in the White House.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment