• 10 hours Citibank Analyst Predicts $300k Bitcoin By End Of 2021
  • 3 days Bitcoin Lives Up To Its Safe Haven Status In A Big Way
  • 3 days 14 Million People Will Lose Unemployment Benefits On December 31st
  • 5 days Why 12 Million American Millionaires Isn’t Good News
  • 6 days Big Oil Is Paying The Price For Investing In Renewables
  • 7 days The Banking Industry’s $35 Billion Gravy Train Could Disappear
  • 8 days Did Amazon Just Democratize Prescription Drugs?
  • 10 days The Private Space Race Just Got Very Real
  • 11 days Short Sellers Are Willing Big In This Turbulent Market
  • 13 days SpaceX Gets Go-Ahead To Send Humans Into Space
  • 13 days Saudi Arabia Lost $27 Billion In Oil Crash
  • 14 days China’s Big Tech Takes A Hit As Regulators Crack Down
  • 15 days Black Friday Could Be Retailers’ Only Hope
  • 16 days Why You Should Not Dump Your Stay At Home Stocks Just Yet
  • 17 days The Real Reason Why Uber And Lyft Stocks Have Soared Nearly 50%
  • 19 days Bitcoin Heads Towards $16,000 And No One’s Cashing In
  • 20 days Elon Musk’s $250 Tesla Tequila Is Already Sold Out
  • 21 days Will The San Francisco Wealth Tax Spark An Exodus Of The Rich?
  • 22 days The Fin-Tech IPO Of The Century Just Got Crushed
  • 23 days UK Bookies Report Largest-Ever Political Bet Ahead Of Election Results
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Who Should Pay For The Syrian Refugees?

Last week the US House dealt a blow to President Obama's plan to resettle 10,000 Syrians fleeing their war-torn homeland. On a vote of 289-137, including 47 Democrats, the House voted to require the FBI to closely vet any applicant from Syria and to guarantee that none of them pose a threat to the US. Effectively this will shut down the program.

The House legislation was brought to the Floor after last week's attacks in Paris that left more than 120 people dead, and for which ISIS claimed responsibility. With the year-long US bombing campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, there is a good deal of concern that among those 10,000 to be settled here there might be some who wish to do us harm. Even though it looks as though the Paris attackers were all EU citizens, polling in the US shows record opposition to allowing Syrian refugees entry.

I agree that we must be very careful about who is permitted to enter the United States, but I object to the president's plan for a very different reason. I think it is a sign of Washington's moral and intellectual bankruptcy that US citizens are being forced to pay for those fleeing Washington's foreign policy.

For the past ten years the US government has been planning and executing a regime change operation against the Syrian government. It is this policy that has produced the chaos in Syria, including the rise of ISIS and al-Qaeda in the country. After a decade of US destabilization efforts, we are now told that Syria is totally destabilized and we therefore must take in thousands of Syrians fleeing the destabilization that Washington caused.

Has there ever been a more foolish and wrong-headed foreign policy than this?

The American people have been forced to pay untold millions for a ten-year CIA and Pentagon program to undermine and overthrow the Syrian government, and now we are supposed to pay millions more to provide welfare for the refugees Obama created.

Who should pay for the millions fleeing the chaos that Washington helped create? How about the military-industrial complex, which makes a killing promoting killing? How about the Beltway neocon think-tanks that continue to churn out pro-war propaganda while receiving huge grants from defense contractors? How about President Obama's national security advisors, who push him into one regime change disaster after another? How about Hillary Clinton, who came up with the bright idea that "Assad must go"? How about President Obama himself, a president elected to end wars, but who has ended up starting more wars than his predecessor? It's time those who start the wars start paying for the disasters they create. Then perhaps we might have some relief from an interventionist foreign policy that is destroying our financial and national security.

If Obama wants to take in refugees from the chaos in Syria, there are probably plenty of vacant rooms in the White House.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment