• 59 mins Aluminum Is Bouncing Back In China
  • 3 hours The Deep-Sea Mining Debate
  • 19 hours Markets Trending Down Despite Tech Blow-Out
  • 1 day Big Oil Battered On Dismal Earnings
  • 2 days Russian Billionaire Bails On Mid-Sized Gold Miner
  • 2 days Gold Stocks Gear Up For A Big Autumn
  • 3 days America Is Looking To Bring Nuclear Power To Space
  • 3 days What Is Behind Gold's Astonishing Rally?
  • 4 days Stocks Tumble On Brutal Economic Report
  • 4 days Kodak Soars By 400% After Trump Bump
  • 5 days U.S. Coal Production Falls To 42 Year Lows
  • 5 days Indonesia Moves To Bolster Mining Sector
  • 6 days The U.S. Dollar Is Losing Ground As A Reserve Currency
  • 6 days Gold Prices Soar To Record Highs As Dollar Dips
  • 7 days Republicans Unveil Stimulus 2.0
  • 7 days Big Oil Is Back On The M&A Game
  • 8 days Big Banks Want Masks And Lockdown In Second COVID Wave
  • 10 days The Unintended Consequences Of A COVID Stimulus
  • 11 days Tesla Looks To Incentivize Nickel Miners With Massive Contract
  • 11 days Congress Butting Heads Over New Round Of Stimulus Checks
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

During the quarter there were…

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Who Should Pay For The Syrian Refugees?

Last week the US House dealt a blow to President Obama's plan to resettle 10,000 Syrians fleeing their war-torn homeland. On a vote of 289-137, including 47 Democrats, the House voted to require the FBI to closely vet any applicant from Syria and to guarantee that none of them pose a threat to the US. Effectively this will shut down the program.

The House legislation was brought to the Floor after last week's attacks in Paris that left more than 120 people dead, and for which ISIS claimed responsibility. With the year-long US bombing campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, there is a good deal of concern that among those 10,000 to be settled here there might be some who wish to do us harm. Even though it looks as though the Paris attackers were all EU citizens, polling in the US shows record opposition to allowing Syrian refugees entry.

I agree that we must be very careful about who is permitted to enter the United States, but I object to the president's plan for a very different reason. I think it is a sign of Washington's moral and intellectual bankruptcy that US citizens are being forced to pay for those fleeing Washington's foreign policy.

For the past ten years the US government has been planning and executing a regime change operation against the Syrian government. It is this policy that has produced the chaos in Syria, including the rise of ISIS and al-Qaeda in the country. After a decade of US destabilization efforts, we are now told that Syria is totally destabilized and we therefore must take in thousands of Syrians fleeing the destabilization that Washington caused.

Has there ever been a more foolish and wrong-headed foreign policy than this?

The American people have been forced to pay untold millions for a ten-year CIA and Pentagon program to undermine and overthrow the Syrian government, and now we are supposed to pay millions more to provide welfare for the refugees Obama created.

Who should pay for the millions fleeing the chaos that Washington helped create? How about the military-industrial complex, which makes a killing promoting killing? How about the Beltway neocon think-tanks that continue to churn out pro-war propaganda while receiving huge grants from defense contractors? How about President Obama's national security advisors, who push him into one regime change disaster after another? How about Hillary Clinton, who came up with the bright idea that "Assad must go"? How about President Obama himself, a president elected to end wars, but who has ended up starting more wars than his predecessor? It's time those who start the wars start paying for the disasters they create. Then perhaps we might have some relief from an interventionist foreign policy that is destroying our financial and national security.

If Obama wants to take in refugees from the chaos in Syria, there are probably plenty of vacant rooms in the White House.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment