• 147 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 152 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 154 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 157 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 157 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 158 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 159 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 160 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 164 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 164 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 165 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 167 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 168 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 171 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 172 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 172 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 174 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 175 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 178 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 179 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Financial Wonderland: Reader Questions on Negative Rates and Money Heaven

Questions on negative rates keep coming in: Where does the money go? Who benefits? Will the Fed do the same? What's Draghi up to?

A quick refresher course on paying interest on excess reserves vs. charging interest on excess reserves is in order.

Q: Who has negative rates?

A: The European Central Bank (ECB), Sveriges Riksbank in Sweden, the Swiss National Bank (SNB), the Bank of Japan (BoJ), and Denmark's Danmarks Nationalbank (DN) all have negative rates.

Q: Negative rates on what?

A: The above five countries have negative rates on "excess reserves". Switzerland also has negative rates on deposits. Most banks are reluctant to put negative rates on deposits fearing bank runs and currency hoarding.

Q: How much are we talking about?

A: Bloomberg Quick Take notes "more than $7 trillion of government bonds worldwide offer yields below zero."

Q: How do excess reserves come into play?

A: Central banks create them through monetary actions like repos and QE hoping to get credit flowing.

Think of it this way: money is printed into existence even though there are no creditworthy borrowers who want loans.

The irony is banks cannot lend excess reserves. Money lent by one bank will simply appear as excess reserves when the money is deposited elsewhere. Mathematically, someone has to hold every cent of money created by central banks.

Q: Who collects the money?

A: If the central bank charges money on excess reserves, the central bank collects the money. In general, bondholders pay money to hold bonds with negative rates. Borrowers get paid to borrow. Yes, this is absurd.

Q: Who benefits from low and negative rates?

A: Asset holders benefit from cheap money, at least initially. Asset prices went through the roof when ECB president Mario Draghi issued his famous "Whatever it Takes" speech on July 26, 2012. Various rounds of QE by the Fed also sent the stock market higher. The obvious consequence is easy to explain: asset bubbles break, leaving banks and borrowers in worse shape.

Q: Is there a limit to negative rates and resultant bubbles?

A: There is always a limit. Everyone is guessing where it is. At some point the greater fools run out or the consequences are such that policies are abandoned. It's possible we hit the limit today (March 10, 2016), given the strong reversal following ECB announcements by Draghi, initially interpreted to be a huge bazooka. As it appears now, the bazooka backfired. See Draghi's "Shock and Awe" campaign morphs into "Shock and Aw Shucks" for further discussion.

Q: Why doesn't the Fed resort to negative rates?

A: Given negative rates have proven to be of negative benefit, why would the Fed want to? However, central banks don't see in those terms. Here are a couple of reasons I presume the Fed does understand:

  1. Negative rates hurt bank profits.
  2. The Fed pays interest on excess deposits. This is a back-door, free-money handout to banks that everyone ought to be protesting. Over time, the Fed has bailed out the banks in numerous ways.
  3. The US has numerous money market funds that would immediately be destroyed if the Fed implemented negative rates.

Money market funds are not in vogue in the Eurozone as they are here. Banks can always raise other fees to mask negative deposit rates. Money market funds cannot do the same.

Q: If negative rates hurt bank profits, why has Europe and Japan embraced them?

A: I suspect Draghi believes asset bubbles and equity support will do more for the Eurozone than lost bank profits. Given the collapse of economic bubbles is very damaging, Draghi is very wrong.

Never underestimate the propensity for central bank stupidity.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment