• 538 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 539 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 540 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 940 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 945 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 947 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 950 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 950 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 951 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 953 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 953 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 957 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 957 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 958 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 960 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 961 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 964 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 965 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 965 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 967 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Summary of My Post-CPI Tweets

Below is a summary of my post-CPI tweets. You can (and should!) follow me @inflation_guy or sign up for email updates to my occasional articles here. Investors with interests in this area be sure to stop by Enduring Investments. Plus...buy my book about money and inflation, just published this month! The title of the book is What's Wrong with Money? The Biggest Bubble of All, order from Amazon here.


 

  • Good morning and welcome to another wonderful CPI day!
  • Three notes before CPI prints in 17 minutes: First, the market is expecting a "soft" 0.2% core (something like 0.16%, rounding up)
  • Second: If we get exactly 0.2% core, then y/y will round higher to 2.3%. Third: if we get exactly 0.3%, y/y core will round to 2.4%.
  • Highest core print since the crisis was 2.32% in 2012. We have a shot of exceeding that today with a robust print.
  • Ten minutes to CPI and time for 1 more coffee and a commercial message: please buy my new book! here
  • whoopsie, core CPI +0.3%. Actually 0.28%, puts y/y at 2.34%. Yayy, a new post-crisis record!
  • Ouch, seems like a big jump in y/y Medical Care, waiting for the breakdown. If so, that makes core PCE jump even more (again).
  • So back to back months we've had 0.29% and 0.28%. I hate to say I told you so but...
  • I said 2.33%, Actually 2.34%. We were VERY close to printing 2.4% y/y & setting off panic at the Fed. Which is abt 4 yrs overdue.
  • I should say 4 years and $2 trillion overdue.
  • [retweet from @boes_] Core consumer price inflation ex-shelter really accelerating: was 1.6% year over year in February

CPI: All items, Shelter and Service

  • core cpi. What, me worry?

CPI Urban Consumers

  • while I wait for my sheets to calculate, let me stress this is not meaningless for the FOMC meeting today.
  • Arguments for waiting another meeting before raising rates are very thin. https://mikeashton.wordpress.com/2016/03/14/feeble-arguments-against-a-rate-hike/
  • i have got to put this database on a faster computer. OK, core services 3.1% from 3% and core goods +0.1% from -0.1%.
  • first positive y/y in core goods in two years.
  • Housing: 2.12% from 2.10%. Primary rents (3.68% from 3.71%) and OER (unch at 3.16%) are NOT the drivers of the core jump.
  • Lodging away from home 4.19% vs 2.67%, but that's a small piece of CPI (<1%)
  • Apparel had big jump in y/y rate to 0.89% from -0.53%, but again Apparel as a whole is 3% of headline, 4% of core.
  • Medical care: 3.50% from 3.00%. Yep.
  • Drugs 2.34% from 2.21%. Professional svcs 2.54% from 2.08%. Hospital svcs 4.90% from 4.32%. Health insurance 5.97% from 4.76%. Ouch.
  • Med care is ~10% of core, so that 50bp jump is 0.05% on core.
  • And remember, Medical care gets a HIGHER WEIGHT in the Fed's preferred measure, core PCE.
  • U-G-L-Y CPI ain't got no alibi. It's ugly (woot! woot!) it's ugly.
  • The good news is pretty thin gruel. Median CPI should be +0.22% or so, keeping y/y around 2.42%. At least it isn't running away yet.
  • Also, NEXT month we roll off an 0.21% from the y/y figure. So the hurdle will be higher for an uptick in core CPI.
  • Like I said, thin gruel. There can be no doubt whatsoever that deflation risks are zero for the foreseeable future.
  • Stocks are doing tremendously well with this, only -9 points or so S&P futures. This is awful news for equities.
  • ...but some observers like to spin "rising inflation" as "sign of robust growth." Nope. See "1970s" in your encyclopedia.
  • The only way this is good news is if you recently wrote a book on inflation. Which, as it turns out, I did: here
  • Distribution of price changes. You can be forgiven for seeing this as giving the Fed the finger.

Weight of CPI Base Cpmpoments

As much as I like to talk, there's just not a lot more to say. This number is awful, as it not only was well above expectations (the m/m figure was about double the rise which analysts expected) but also it wasn't driven by shelter but rather by Apparel (a little) and - worst of all - Medical Care. Here is a chart of y/y Medical Care (Source: Bloomberg).

CPI Medical

Here is a subcomponent of medical care, "Professional Services" (Source: Bloomberg).

CPI professional Services

And finally, again, here's the context. This chart (Source: Bloomberg) shows median inflation (top line), core inflation converging on it (middle line), and core PCE shooting higher (bottom line). Note that the top and bottom lines are not updated for the most-recent month.

CPI Less Food and Energy

At this hour, stocks are inexplicably unchanged. This is awful news for stocks, which tend to be most-highly valued when inflation is low and stable and the Fed is quiescent. Now we have inflation that is moderate, but rising, and a Fed which is not only active, but with numbers like this may eventually become more so. If they do not, it is only because growth is weak (and weakening)...and someone please explain to me why that is a positive environment for stocks? One can make an argument that bonds can do okay if growth flags (even though growth does not cause or lead inflation), because real rates are too high for the level of nominal rates and that could conceivably reach equilibrium by TIPS rallying rather than nominal bonds selling off. But it's a hard argument to be bullish on the big two asset classes. (However, I expect Wall Street to make that argument loudly.)

 


You can follow me @inflation_guy!

Enduring Investments is a registered investment adviser that specializes in solving inflation-related problems. Fill out the contact form at http://www.EnduringInvestments.com/contact and we will send you our latest Quarterly Inflation Outlook. And if you make sure to put your physical mailing address in the "comment" section of the contact form, we will also send you a copy of Michael Ashton's book "Maestro, My Ass!"

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment