• 552 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 552 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 554 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 954 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 959 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 961 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 964 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 964 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 965 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 967 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 967 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 971 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 971 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 972 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 974 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 975 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 978 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 979 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 979 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 981 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

An Extended 4-Year Cycle

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was created in 1896 by Charles H. Dow. Mr. Dow recognized that there were movements of various degrees within the markets. He described these movements as Primary, Secondary and Minor and he likened these movements to the action of the tide, the waves and the ripples. Mr. Dow only referenced three basic movements in his writings, but there are natural cyclical movements within the market of many many degrees. This natural cyclical behavior ranges from very short-term intraday fluctuations, to much longer-term broad cyclical movements that consist of months and even years.

The primary longer-term cyclical movement within equities is the 4-year cycle. When I say 4-year cycle, many mistakenly try to tie the 4-year cycle to that of the presidential cycle, which also happens to be 4 years, but is not the 4-year cycle which I am referring to. Since the inception of the Dow Jones Industrial Average there has been 27 completed 4-year cycles that have averaged 48.07 months from low to low. Like the seasons of the year, cycles in the market are fluid in that their durations can vary. For example, sometimes spring comes early and sometimes it comes late, but it always comes. With the stock market, while cycles of different degrees are fluid and their duration can vary over time, there are norms and they are without question quantifiable.

I have included a chart of the Industrials below showing the ebb and flow of the 4-year cycle since 1896. Because of the amount of data on this chart and the broad movement from a reading of 32 in 1896 to over 18,000 in 2015, the magnitude of the advances and declines of some cycles appears minimal, but based on the relative price action at the time, they are not. For example, the decline from the 1973 4-year cycle top into the 1974 4-year cycle low may appear as only a blip on the chart below, but in reality it was a 46.58% decline.

Of the 27 completed 4-year cycles since 1896, 14 have had a duration of greater than 48.07 months with 13 having had a duration of less than 48 months. We are all aware of the central bank intervention to save the markets that began following the 2000 top. As price rose out of the 2002 4-year cycle low, the intervention that followed resulted in not only what was at that time the longest 4-year cycle in stock market history, but those efforts to extend that cycle ultimately resulted in the worst financial crisis since The Great Depression. Yet, as the 4-year cycle advance out of the March 2009 low began, the level of intervention only intensified and now the current 4-year cycle advance has become THE most extended 4-year cycle ever! Now, one may ask, if the 4-year cycle is fluid and in light of the intervention, how do we know when this illusive cycle has topped or bottomed? That is a very good question and it was for this very reason that I developed a set of tangible and quantifiable parameters that have been seen at every 4-year cycle top since 1896. It is in turn these tangible parameters that can be used to identify and quantify the cycles, be it a cycle of normal duration, or a cycle of short or extended duration.

It is never nice to fool with Mother Nature. Based on history and as was the case with the last extended cycle into the 2007 top, all efforts to control, manage, manipulate, negate or extend the inevitable ebb and flow of a cycle has always failed and it typically proves to only make matters worse once it does. As a result of the extension of the current 4-year cycle, the underlying technical, fundamental, economic, social and political environment in which this extended 4-year cycle has occurred, I believe that this is THE most dangerous stock market environment since the inception of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in 1896. All the while, the extension of this 4-year cycle has created a mirage, an illusion of endless prosperity for the market. But, based on over 120 years of market history, I believe that the natural force will prevail and that as was the case with the extension of the last 4-year cycle, the current extension has only made matters worse.

Dow Jones Industrial Average 1890-2016 Chart
Larger Image

Dow Jones Industrial Average 1983-2016 Chart
Larger Image

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment