• 10 hours Hedge Funds Having A Banner Year
  • 13 hours Disney Heiress Asks “Is There Such A Thing As Too Much?”
  • 16 hours BHP Turns Bullish On EVs
  • 18 hours Investors Turn Bullish On America’s Nuclear Decommissioning Business
  • 1 day The $90M Inflatable Rabbit Redefining Modern Art
  • 2 days Huawei’s Fate In The Air
  • 2 days Tesla Slashes Prices Again
  • 2 days The Modern History Of Financial Entropy
  • 2 days Italy’s Central Bank Embraces Sustainable Investing
  • 3 days Trump Lifts Metals Tariffs To Cool Simmering Trade War
  • 3 days Researchers Push To Limit Space Mining
  • 3 days Could China Start Dumping U.S. Treasury Bonds?
  • 3 days Is Winter Coming For HBO?
  • 4 days Rise Of EVs Signals Peak Gasoline
  • 4 days Jeff Bezos Doubles Down On Space Colonization Ambitions
  • 5 days Gold Mining Stocks Stuck In Limbo
  • 5 days Executive Order Targets Huawei Over Espionage
  • 6 days Why Now May Be The Best Time Ever To Hold Gold
  • 6 days Fake News Sinks Shares In UK-Based Bank
  • 7 days De Beers To Build $468 Million Diamond Recovery Ship
How Millennials Are Reshaping Real Estate

How Millennials Are Reshaping Real Estate

The real estate market is…

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Earnings season is well underway,…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Much Ado About Restrooms

Debates over the US government's foreign and economic policies have recently taken a backseat to the debate over what bathroom transgender individuals should use. The two sides of the debate both believe that government has the legitimate authority to tell private businesses who they should allow to use their facilities. Few on either side of this debate defend the right of private property owners to decide for themselves who may and may not use their bathrooms.

Some say government must be involved in this issue in order to ensure that private businesses do not violate individual rights. Those who make this claim are accepting the idea that rights are no more than a gift from the government that can be revoked at the will and whim of legislators and bureaucrats. This argument turns rights from a shield protecting our liberties into a sword that can and will be used to increase government control of our lives.

Two weeks ago, the Department of Education waded into this debate by threatening to withhold federal funds from schools that do not allow transgender students to use the restroom of their choice. State and local officials around the country have promised to resist the Education Department's new bathroom rules. However, given how addicted most state and local governments and school boards are to federal funds, it is likely that even most conservative state governments and school boards will eventually adopt the bathroom policies desired by federal bureaucrats.

Many of the conservatives who (correctly) denounce the Obama administration for trying to blackmail local schools either supported or were silent when a so-called conservative administration expanded the federal role in education via No Child Left Behind. These conservatives fail to realize that No Child Left Behind's testing and other mandates are no different in principle from President Barack Obama's bathroom mandates. Both use money stolen from the people and sent back to the states to force states to change their policies according to federal commands. Both are equally unconstitutional. Conservatives who want to defend local schools from federal bureaucrats must work to repeal, not reform, the Department of Education.

One positive result from this latest controversy is that it may encourage more parents to homeschool. Homeschooling is a means for parents to provide their children a quality education that meets the children's needs. Homeschooling allows parents to ensure that their child's education reflects their values and beliefs, not the values and beliefs of federal bureaucrats.

Working with a team of top scholars, I have created my own homeschooling curriculum. My homeschooling curriculum provides students with a rigorous education in history, math, English, and other subjects. The curriculum is designed to benefit both college-bound students and those interested in pursuing other educational or career opportunities.

The curriculum features three tracks: natural sciences/math, social sciences/humanities, and business. Students may also take courses in personal finance and public speaking. The government and history sections of the curriculum emphasize Austrian economics, libertarian political theory, and the history of liberty. Unlike government school, my curriculum never puts ideological indoctrination ahead of education.

 


For more information please go to ronpaulcurriculum.com.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment