• 9 hours Another Major Car Maker Is Backing Hydrogen
  • 1 day Are Americans Finally Sold On Soccer?
  • 1 day Is The Tech Bubble About To Burst?
  • 2 days Coronavirus Could Cost Tourism Industry $80 Billion
  • 2 days What Web Traffic Trends Can Tell Us About The World
  • 2 days Miners Face Greater Headwinds
  • 3 days Boris Johnson Proposes Billion Dollar Bridge To Northern Ireland
  • 4 days Goldman Slashes Oil Price Forecast By $10
  • 5 days Tesla Raises $2 Billion In Share Selloff
  • 6 days What The T-Mobile Takeover Of Sprint Really Means For Markets
  • 6 days The U.S. Has Charged Huawei With Racketeering And Conspiracy
  • 6 days How Hydrogen Could Become The Fuel Of The Future
  • 7 days Millennials Can’t Retire, But They’ll Still Have To Help Their Parents
  • 7 days This Gold Miner Just Increased Its Dividends By 40%
  • 7 days Airbnb IPO Under Threat As China's Economy Drags
  • 8 days The Infamous Equifax Hack Just Became A National Security Issue
  • 8 days BHP Takes The Crown As World’s Top Copper Miner
  • 8 days Tesla Reopens Chinese Factory After Coronavirus Scare
  • 9 days Armed Troops Storm El Salvador’s Parliament
  • 9 days Is A New Housing Bubble Forming?
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

History Lesson: Don't Count On History

I would have loved to have predicted the Brexit vote with confidence. But I didn't. Instead I predicted a 52-48 win for Remain.

However, I did repeatedly warn (to no avail) to Matt Singh and others counting on "history", that counting on history was a bad idea.


Comments Ahead of the Vote

In my final post before the vote I noted Last Four Brexit Polls Split: Turnout of Age 18-35 Likely the Key.

Turnout was indeed the key, but I also questioned the methodology of the latest polls.

Likelihood to Vote

Explaining ORB's Final BREXIT Poll Results
Larger Image

In ORB's final poll, not only did the likelihood of the two most likely age groups to vote Remain rise dramatically, the likelihood of the most likely age group to vote Leave fell.

On top of that, ORB imputed a 3-1 advantage for Remain on most undecided voters, leaving a mere 2% truly "undecided".


What Happened?

What happened is all the polls that got it wrong last time, changed their methodology in belief that Matt Singh, was the the latest all-knowing God, just as Nate Silver was in the US.

Neither Nate Silver, nor Matt Singh responded to numerous emails or Tweets. My Tweets to Singh were not combative (until after vote), and in many cases I simply asked polite questions because I did not understand his methods or terminology.

That ORB poll was ridiculous. I called it at the time. Undecideds suddenly became a 3-1 favorite for Remain, based on "history".

Both Nate Silver and Matt Singh had more faith in history than changes in attitudes.

My mistake, and I made one, was believing pollsters at the end, when it was clear they changed their methodology to accommodate history, just as Matt Singh, like Nate Silver before him did.

At any rate, I take pride in pointing out the odds were much closer than the pollsters and the likes of those counting on history had you believe.

Anyone confident of victory and was correct, went out on a limb. No one knew this outcome. Anyone whom tells you they did know the outcome is a fool or a charlatan.

That said, I do get to gloat on one thing: my repeated calls that the odds were way wrong and those who had faith in the betting odds bookies offered and Matt Singh verified were way wrong.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment