• 17 hours 3 Restaurant Stocks In Full Recovery Mode
  • 1 day Bitcoin Is Driven By Testosterone
  • 6 days Quantum Computing Is The Newest Megatrend In Silicon Valley
  • 7 days How To Invest In The Cybersecurity Boom
  • 9 days Investors Are Patient With Unprofitable Giants
  • 11 days Wells Fargo Back In The Scandal Spotlight Once Again
  • 13 days 5 Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On This Year
  • 14 days As Auto Giants Flail, Look To Chip Stocks For Gains
  • 15 days Central America Is Ready For The Bitcoin Hustle
  • 17 days China’s Video Game Restrictions Unlikely To Slow Down Booming Industry
  • 18 days Top Performing Stocks As Inflation Fears Grow
  • 19 days US Airline Stocks Take A Beating On New EU Restrictions
  • 20 days This IPO Could Open Sustainable Fashion Floodgates
  • 21 days Crypto Crime Nets Another $2B Fraudster
  • 23 days This Week’s Hottest Meme Stocks
  • 24 days Why World Markets Should Be Watching Germany Closely
  • 26 days Could ‘Cultured’ Meat Rival The Plant-Based Megatrend?
  • 28 days ‘Easy Money’: Crypto Is Still Attracting Newbie Investors
  • 30 days Foreign Syndicates May Have Stolen Up To $400B In COVID Benefits
  • 31 days Gold Jumps Above $1800 Ahead Of Jackson Hole Summit
Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

History Lesson: Don't Count On History

I would have loved to have predicted the Brexit vote with confidence. But I didn't. Instead I predicted a 52-48 win for Remain.

However, I did repeatedly warn (to no avail) to Matt Singh and others counting on "history", that counting on history was a bad idea.


Comments Ahead of the Vote

In my final post before the vote I noted Last Four Brexit Polls Split: Turnout of Age 18-35 Likely the Key.

Turnout was indeed the key, but I also questioned the methodology of the latest polls.

Likelihood to Vote

Explaining ORB's Final BREXIT Poll Results
Larger Image

In ORB's final poll, not only did the likelihood of the two most likely age groups to vote Remain rise dramatically, the likelihood of the most likely age group to vote Leave fell.

On top of that, ORB imputed a 3-1 advantage for Remain on most undecided voters, leaving a mere 2% truly "undecided".


What Happened?

What happened is all the polls that got it wrong last time, changed their methodology in belief that Matt Singh, was the the latest all-knowing God, just as Nate Silver was in the US.

Neither Nate Silver, nor Matt Singh responded to numerous emails or Tweets. My Tweets to Singh were not combative (until after vote), and in many cases I simply asked polite questions because I did not understand his methods or terminology.

That ORB poll was ridiculous. I called it at the time. Undecideds suddenly became a 3-1 favorite for Remain, based on "history".

Both Nate Silver and Matt Singh had more faith in history than changes in attitudes.

My mistake, and I made one, was believing pollsters at the end, when it was clear they changed their methodology to accommodate history, just as Matt Singh, like Nate Silver before him did.

At any rate, I take pride in pointing out the odds were much closer than the pollsters and the likes of those counting on history had you believe.

Anyone confident of victory and was correct, went out on a limb. No one knew this outcome. Anyone whom tells you they did know the outcome is a fool or a charlatan.

That said, I do get to gloat on one thing: my repeated calls that the odds were way wrong and those who had faith in the betting odds bookies offered and Matt Singh verified were way wrong.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment