• 268 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 273 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 275 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 278 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 278 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 279 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 281 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 281 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 285 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 285 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 286 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 288 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 289 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 292 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 293 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 293 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 295 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 296 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 299 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 300 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

History Lesson: Don't Count On History

I would have loved to have predicted the Brexit vote with confidence. But I didn't. Instead I predicted a 52-48 win for Remain.

However, I did repeatedly warn (to no avail) to Matt Singh and others counting on "history", that counting on history was a bad idea.


Comments Ahead of the Vote

In my final post before the vote I noted Last Four Brexit Polls Split: Turnout of Age 18-35 Likely the Key.

Turnout was indeed the key, but I also questioned the methodology of the latest polls.

Likelihood to Vote

Explaining ORB's Final BREXIT Poll Results
Larger Image

In ORB's final poll, not only did the likelihood of the two most likely age groups to vote Remain rise dramatically, the likelihood of the most likely age group to vote Leave fell.

On top of that, ORB imputed a 3-1 advantage for Remain on most undecided voters, leaving a mere 2% truly "undecided".


What Happened?

What happened is all the polls that got it wrong last time, changed their methodology in belief that Matt Singh, was the the latest all-knowing God, just as Nate Silver was in the US.

Neither Nate Silver, nor Matt Singh responded to numerous emails or Tweets. My Tweets to Singh were not combative (until after vote), and in many cases I simply asked polite questions because I did not understand his methods or terminology.

That ORB poll was ridiculous. I called it at the time. Undecideds suddenly became a 3-1 favorite for Remain, based on "history".

Both Nate Silver and Matt Singh had more faith in history than changes in attitudes.

My mistake, and I made one, was believing pollsters at the end, when it was clear they changed their methodology to accommodate history, just as Matt Singh, like Nate Silver before him did.

At any rate, I take pride in pointing out the odds were much closer than the pollsters and the likes of those counting on history had you believe.

Anyone confident of victory and was correct, went out on a limb. No one knew this outcome. Anyone whom tells you they did know the outcome is a fool or a charlatan.

That said, I do get to gloat on one thing: my repeated calls that the odds were way wrong and those who had faith in the betting odds bookies offered and Matt Singh verified were way wrong.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment