• 1 day El Salvador’s Surprise Bitcoin Move
  • 4 days Markets Unfazed As Inflation Hits 13-Year High
  • 5 days How the Token Economy is Disrupting Financial Markets
  • 7 days FBI Investigating 100 Types Of Ransomware Attacks
  • 9 days Fed Ends Corporate Credit Emergency Lending Program
  • 11 days AMC Becomes the Latest Winning Meme Stock After GameStop
  • 12 days The Real Reason Your 401k Has Been Lagging
  • 13 days China Lifts Cap On Births, Allows Three Children Per Couple
  • 15 days The Market Is Ripe For Another GameStop Saga
  • 18 days Senate Grills Big Banks Over Pandemic Opportunism
  • 19 days Cannabis Has A Major Cash Problem
  • 20 days Ransomware Netted Criminals $350M In 2020 Alone
  • 21 days Russia Is Taking On Google
  • 22 days Chinese Regulators Deal Another Big Blow To Bitcoin
  • 23 days Ohio Residents Brave Vaccine for Chance To Win $1M
  • 25 days Inflation Is Coming. Are You Prepared?
  • 26 days Travel Might Get Another Supersonic Disruption
  • 27 days The World Is Running Out Of 6 Key Resources
  • 28 days $15/Hour Minimum Wage Might Happen Naturally
  • 30 days Money-Laundering Binance Probe Report Adds To Bitcoin Woes
Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

History Lesson: Don't Count On History

I would have loved to have predicted the Brexit vote with confidence. But I didn't. Instead I predicted a 52-48 win for Remain.

However, I did repeatedly warn (to no avail) to Matt Singh and others counting on "history", that counting on history was a bad idea.


Comments Ahead of the Vote

In my final post before the vote I noted Last Four Brexit Polls Split: Turnout of Age 18-35 Likely the Key.

Turnout was indeed the key, but I also questioned the methodology of the latest polls.

Likelihood to Vote

Explaining ORB's Final BREXIT Poll Results
Larger Image

In ORB's final poll, not only did the likelihood of the two most likely age groups to vote Remain rise dramatically, the likelihood of the most likely age group to vote Leave fell.

On top of that, ORB imputed a 3-1 advantage for Remain on most undecided voters, leaving a mere 2% truly "undecided".


What Happened?

What happened is all the polls that got it wrong last time, changed their methodology in belief that Matt Singh, was the the latest all-knowing God, just as Nate Silver was in the US.

Neither Nate Silver, nor Matt Singh responded to numerous emails or Tweets. My Tweets to Singh were not combative (until after vote), and in many cases I simply asked polite questions because I did not understand his methods or terminology.

That ORB poll was ridiculous. I called it at the time. Undecideds suddenly became a 3-1 favorite for Remain, based on "history".

Both Nate Silver and Matt Singh had more faith in history than changes in attitudes.

My mistake, and I made one, was believing pollsters at the end, when it was clear they changed their methodology to accommodate history, just as Matt Singh, like Nate Silver before him did.

At any rate, I take pride in pointing out the odds were much closer than the pollsters and the likes of those counting on history had you believe.

Anyone confident of victory and was correct, went out on a limb. No one knew this outcome. Anyone whom tells you they did know the outcome is a fool or a charlatan.

That said, I do get to gloat on one thing: my repeated calls that the odds were way wrong and those who had faith in the betting odds bookies offered and Matt Singh verified were way wrong.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment