• 2 hours Big Banks Could Win Big On Fed Small Business Bailout
  • 3 hours Trump Increases Pressure On Venezuela
  • 7 hours Researchers Create Organic Battery
  • 23 hours Gold Is Still A Safe Haven, But Not Very Alluring
  • 1 day China Is Buying Up Billions Of Barrels Of Cheap Crude Oil
  • 2 days Are Gold Stocks Going To Bounce Back?
  • 2 days The Politics Of A Pandemic
  • 3 days What Does CHina’s EV Slowdown Mean For The Battery Metals Sector?
  • 4 days COVID Report Cards Will Brand Businesses Forever
  • 4 days Trump Tweet Sends Oil Soaring 25%
  • 5 days Why The Coronavirus Economic Crash Is Worse Than You Think
  • 5 days Is A Global Currency Necessary?
  • 6 days America Has Shed 500,000 Millionaires Since The Coronavirus Lockdown Began
  • 6 days Trump Wants Another $2 Trillion Economic Intervention
  • 7 days The Surprising Businesses Deemed “Essential” During The Coronavirus Lockdown
  • 7 days Priceless Van Gogh "Spring Garden" Painting Stolen
  • 7 days Oil Falls To $20 For First Time In Nearly Two Decades
  • 7 days COVID-19 Could Be The End Of U.S. Coal
  • 8 days How Much Does Your Social Security Number Cost? $4 On The Dark Web
  • 9 days Silver Stocks Have Been Decimated In The Coronavirus Sell-Off
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

History Lesson: Don't Count On History

I would have loved to have predicted the Brexit vote with confidence. But I didn't. Instead I predicted a 52-48 win for Remain.

However, I did repeatedly warn (to no avail) to Matt Singh and others counting on "history", that counting on history was a bad idea.


Comments Ahead of the Vote

In my final post before the vote I noted Last Four Brexit Polls Split: Turnout of Age 18-35 Likely the Key.

Turnout was indeed the key, but I also questioned the methodology of the latest polls.

Likelihood to Vote

Explaining ORB's Final BREXIT Poll Results
Larger Image

In ORB's final poll, not only did the likelihood of the two most likely age groups to vote Remain rise dramatically, the likelihood of the most likely age group to vote Leave fell.

On top of that, ORB imputed a 3-1 advantage for Remain on most undecided voters, leaving a mere 2% truly "undecided".


What Happened?

What happened is all the polls that got it wrong last time, changed their methodology in belief that Matt Singh, was the the latest all-knowing God, just as Nate Silver was in the US.

Neither Nate Silver, nor Matt Singh responded to numerous emails or Tweets. My Tweets to Singh were not combative (until after vote), and in many cases I simply asked polite questions because I did not understand his methods or terminology.

That ORB poll was ridiculous. I called it at the time. Undecideds suddenly became a 3-1 favorite for Remain, based on "history".

Both Nate Silver and Matt Singh had more faith in history than changes in attitudes.

My mistake, and I made one, was believing pollsters at the end, when it was clear they changed their methodology to accommodate history, just as Matt Singh, like Nate Silver before him did.

At any rate, I take pride in pointing out the odds were much closer than the pollsters and the likes of those counting on history had you believe.

Anyone confident of victory and was correct, went out on a limb. No one knew this outcome. Anyone whom tells you they did know the outcome is a fool or a charlatan.

That said, I do get to gloat on one thing: my repeated calls that the odds were way wrong and those who had faith in the betting odds bookies offered and Matt Singh verified were way wrong.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment