• 271 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 276 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 278 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 281 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 281 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 282 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 284 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 284 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 288 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 288 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 289 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 291 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 292 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 295 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 296 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 296 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 298 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 299 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 302 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 303 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Fossil Fuels Are Toast - But Real Assets Are Still The Place To Be

With all the oil-related headlines we're exposed to each day, you might assume that "black gold," along with other fossil fuels like coal and natural gas, matter to humanity's future. You'd be wrong. Like Keynesian economics and fiat currencies, fossil fuels are near the end of their run. From here on out, solar is the story.

The following chart shows the decline in the cost of solar power and the resulting surge in solar installations through 2015. The relationship is clear: as prices plunge demand surges -- in both cases exponentially.

Solar Panel Price per Watt and Global Solar Panel Installations

Pretty impressive, right? But nothing compared to what happened in 2016:

Solar Power Installations

And here's one more chart showing how China -- that insanely polluted coal burning urban dystopia -- is leading the way on solar:

New Solar Capacity Rose 50% in 2016

This is shocking to people who A) are dependent on fossil fuels through work or investing or B) don't understand the way exponential growth can change a market in an eye blink. So let's hear from the father of exponential analysis, Google's director of engineering Ray Kurzweil:

Ray Kurzweil: Here's Why Solar Will Dominate Energy Within 12 Years

(Fortune) - Ray Kurzweil has made a bold prediction about the future of solar energy, saying in remarks at a recent medical technology conference that it could become the dominant force in energy production in a little over a decade. That may be tough to swallow, given that solar currently only supplies around 2% of global energy -- but Kurzweil's predictions have been overwhelmingly correct over the last two decades, so he's worth listening to.

Kurzweil's basic point, as reported by Solar Power World, was that while solar is still tiny, it has begun to reliably double its market share every two years -- today's 2% share is up from just 0.5% in 2012.

Many analysts extend growth linearly from that sort of pattern, concluding that we'll see 0.5% annual growth in solar for the foreseeable future, reaching just 12% solar share in 20 years. But linear analysis ignores what Kurzweil calls the Law of Accelerating Returns -- that as new technologies get smaller and cheaper, their growth becomes exponential.

So instead of looking at year over year growth in percentage terms, Kurzweil says we should look at the rate of growth--the fact that solar market share is doubling every two years. If the current 2% share doubles every two years, solar should have a 100% share of the market in 12 years.

Okay, technically, that would suggest solar would have a 128% share of the market in 12 years. Some might love that -- but it highlights the fact that Kurzweil's prediction is only partially grounded in the real world. Even 100% share is extremely unlikely -- fossil fuel giants are definitely not going down without a fight.

But even those giants ignore Kurzweil at their own peril. He predicted the mobile Internet, cloud computing, and wearable tech nearly 20 years ago -- all on the basis of the same principle of accelerating returns that's behind his solar call.

Why is something like this appearing on a gloom-and-doom blog? Because one of the basic tenets of sound-money investing is that during periods in which society is destroying its fiat currencies, real assets will tend to outperform financial assets. So swap your government bonds (and certainly your bank stocks!) for farmland, well-chosen rental houses, gold, silver, and energy assets.

For the past century that last category was dominated by oil wells, coal mines and the stocks of the companies that owned them. But if the above trends continue - and it's a near certainty that they will, given the torrent of advances in solar panels and batteries pouring out of labs around the world - then "energy assets" of the future will likely be solar and wind farms, advanced battery makers and the like. So the thesis remains the same while technology causes the names to change.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment