• 8 hours India To Auction 41 Coal Assets
  • 16 hours Eldorado Sees Gold Production Soar In Second Quarte
  • 2 days Do Gold Stocks Still Have Upside Potential?
  • 2 days The S&P 500’s Top Companies Hold $2.5 Trillion In Debt
  • 3 days Electric Vehicle Rebound Bolsters Battery Metal Growth
  • 3 days BlackRock Makes A Run On Asian Stocks
  • 4 days Gold Prices Surge Above $1,800
  • 4 days Chinese Stocks Soar On Bullish Economic Data
  • 5 days Apple’s “Holy Grail Of Data” Leaves Energy Traders Disappointed
  • 5 days Gold Rally Adds $250 Billion To Top 50 Miners' Market Cap
  • 5 days TikTok Is Becoming A New Battleground For Tech Politics
  • 6 days Peru's Mining Industry Pummeled As Coronavirus Cases Surge
  • 6 days Why The World Is So Divided In Its COVID-19 Response
  • 6 days Equities Cheer Stellar Jobs Report, But It May Be Fleeting
  • 7 days Is Tech Billionaire Peter Thiel Done With Trump?
  • 8 days Musk Takes To Twitter To Troll The SEC
  • 9 days Lunar Mining May Commence As Early As 2025
  • 9 days Immigration Will Go Bust Without $1.2B Bailout
  • 10 days The Economics Of The Space Race
  • 11 days Why The World's Central Banks Aren't Yet Sold On Renewables
Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

During the quarter there were…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Two Percent Growth as Good as It Gets?

There have been 11 recessions and 11 recoveries since 1949.

The current recovery is the slowest recovery since 1949 and closing in on the becoming longest.

Growth since the 2nd quarter of 2009 is a mere 2.1%. The Wall Street Journal asks Is Two Percent as Good as It Gets?

Average Annual Change in GDP, by expansion

"The growth seen during the recovery might, for a while, be as good as it gets," the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco's John Fernald, Stanford University's Robert Hall, Harvard University's James Stock, and Princeton University's Mark Watson said in a study to be presented among Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

Inquiring minds may wish to download the Brookings' report entitled Disappointing Recovery of Output After 2009 but I found it a waste of time.


Okun's Law

The report was mostly mathematical gibberish based on Okun's Law.

Okun's law (named after Arthur Melvin Okun, who proposed the relationship in 1962) is an empirically observed relationship between unemployment and losses in a country's production. The "gap version" states that for every 1% increase in the unemployment rate, a country's GDP will be roughly an additional 2% lower than its potential GDP. The "difference version" describes the relationship between quarterly changes in unemployment and quarterly changes in real GDP. The stability and usefulness of the law has been disputed.

Clearly, Okun's Law is at least as useless as any widely believed economic law, which is to say totally useless.

The supporting paper consists of 90 pages of largely unintelligible garbage such as the following.

Bayesian Implementation of Rando-walk-plus noise model for TFP growth


Commendable Effort

The Wall Street Journal managed to condense 90 pages of nonsense down to 2 pages of nonsense. That's a highly commendable effort, and the best one could reasonably expect.

Here's the conclusion: "The causes aren't entirely clear."

I searched the 90-page report for the word "debt". Care to guess the number of hits? I bet you can: zero.


Modern Day Snake Oil

I was discussing economic indicators with Pater Tenebrarum at the Acting Man Blog a couple of days ago. He pinged me with the correct takeaway.

Economic forecasting is not a science, and it is actually not the task of economic science to make forecasts (contrary to what is commonly asserted). Forecasting is akin to the task of the historian. Mises called speculators "historians of the future".

Economic laws only play a role insofar as they can be used as constraints for a forecast. The problem is that all these models simply look at the data of economic history, at statistical series that always turn tail "unexpectedly", driven by human action.

All these mathematical models are complete humbug. It is modern-day snake oil.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment