• 384 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 389 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 391 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 394 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 394 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 395 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 397 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 397 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 401 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 401 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 402 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 404 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 405 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 408 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 409 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 409 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 411 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 412 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 415 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 416 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Two Percent Growth as Good as It Gets?

There have been 11 recessions and 11 recoveries since 1949.

The current recovery is the slowest recovery since 1949 and closing in on the becoming longest.

Growth since the 2nd quarter of 2009 is a mere 2.1%. The Wall Street Journal asks Is Two Percent as Good as It Gets?

Average Annual Change in GDP, by expansion

"The growth seen during the recovery might, for a while, be as good as it gets," the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco's John Fernald, Stanford University's Robert Hall, Harvard University's James Stock, and Princeton University's Mark Watson said in a study to be presented among Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

Inquiring minds may wish to download the Brookings' report entitled Disappointing Recovery of Output After 2009 but I found it a waste of time.


Okun's Law

The report was mostly mathematical gibberish based on Okun's Law.

Okun's law (named after Arthur Melvin Okun, who proposed the relationship in 1962) is an empirically observed relationship between unemployment and losses in a country's production. The "gap version" states that for every 1% increase in the unemployment rate, a country's GDP will be roughly an additional 2% lower than its potential GDP. The "difference version" describes the relationship between quarterly changes in unemployment and quarterly changes in real GDP. The stability and usefulness of the law has been disputed.

Clearly, Okun's Law is at least as useless as any widely believed economic law, which is to say totally useless.

The supporting paper consists of 90 pages of largely unintelligible garbage such as the following.

Bayesian Implementation of Rando-walk-plus noise model for TFP growth


Commendable Effort

The Wall Street Journal managed to condense 90 pages of nonsense down to 2 pages of nonsense. That's a highly commendable effort, and the best one could reasonably expect.

Here's the conclusion: "The causes aren't entirely clear."

I searched the 90-page report for the word "debt". Care to guess the number of hits? I bet you can: zero.


Modern Day Snake Oil

I was discussing economic indicators with Pater Tenebrarum at the Acting Man Blog a couple of days ago. He pinged me with the correct takeaway.

Economic forecasting is not a science, and it is actually not the task of economic science to make forecasts (contrary to what is commonly asserted). Forecasting is akin to the task of the historian. Mises called speculators "historians of the future".

Economic laws only play a role insofar as they can be used as constraints for a forecast. The problem is that all these models simply look at the data of economic history, at statistical series that always turn tail "unexpectedly", driven by human action.

All these mathematical models are complete humbug. It is modern-day snake oil.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment