• 7 hours Conspiracy Theories Set Tone For 5G Cold War
  • 8 hours Working From Home Will Transform The Energy Industry
  • 9 hours The Multi-Billion Dollar Race For A Vaccine
  • 10 hours Can Domestic Tourism Bolster Emerging Economies?
  • 11 hours Australia Considers $100 Million Investment To Kickstart Mining Industry
  • 12 hours Has Re-Opening The Economy Been Successful?
  • 13 hours Gold Miners Still Have Massive Upside Potential
  • 14 hours The Risky World Of Oil Hedging
  • 15 hours Africa Turns To Innovation Amid The Global Pandemic
  • 16 hours COVID-19 Sparked A Bicycle Boom
  • 17 hours Will Government COVID Intervention Cause Inflation?
  • 1 day The Bitcoin Miner That Is Paid To Do Nothing
  • 2 days Capital Gain vs. Capital Consumption
  • 2 days Tesla’s Latest Battery Innovation Ready For Use In China
  • 2 days China Targets Hong Kong As Cold War With US Heats Up
  • 3 days No Shirt, No Shoes, No Mask, No Service
  • 5 days Is Bitcoin Actually Worth The Energy It Uses?
  • 5 days Insurance Companies Are Turning People Away As COVID-19 Crisis Escalates
  • 5 days Mining Exploration To Drop By Nearly 30% Despite Gold Boom
  • 5 days Europe Set To Unveil Its $500 Billion 'Green Deal'
Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Michael Pento

Michael Pento

Delta Global

With more than 16 years of industry experience, Michael Pento acts as chief economist for Delta Global Advisors and is a contributing writer for GreenFaucet.com.…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Raise the Inflation Target and Put a Date on It!

Raise the Inflation Target and Put a Date on It! That’s the direction some high-profile economist and former members on the FOMC want to go. According to these academics, including Narayana Kocherlakota the former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 2009 to 2015, raising the inflation target just isn’t enough. They want to put a time horizon on it as well. In other words, they want to raise the inflation target higher than the current 2% level, and then place a firm date as to when that inflation goal must be achieved.

Their rational for doing both actions is to reduce the level of real interest rates, which they somehow believe is the progenitor for viable GDP growth. You see, once the Fed has taken the nominal Fed Funds Rate to zero, there isn’t much more room to the downside unless these money manipulators assent to negative nominal interest rates. But charging banks to hold excess reserves is fraught with danger, and so far this idea has been eschewed in this country and has been proven ineffectual in Europe.

The Fed wants the flexibility to make real interest rates more negative than the minus 2% that would be achieved at the zero-bound rate when using the current 2% inflation target.

The next recession could be just around the corner and the Fed is thinking about ways to stimulate the economy given the fact that the amount of ammunition--the number of rate cuts until the F.F.R. hits zero percent--is extremely limited. With very little leeway available to reduce borrowing costs, these mainstream academics want to facilitate more negative real interest rates by ensuring inflation is higher right from the start.

The math is simple: a three percent (or higher) inflation rate would equate to at least a minus three percent real F.F.R. once the nominal rate hit zero. But as to why these Keynesian academics are so convinced a lower real interest rate is better for economic growth is never clearly explained. Probably because it is a nonsensical tenet and the biggest fallacy in all of central bank group think. Their spurious logic dictates that a lower unemployment rate is the primary cause of rising rates of inflation and that a higher rate of inflation is supportive for lowering the unemployment rate. Exactly how this simple model arrives at that conclusion is never cogently explained; other than the mistaken belief that inflation and growth are synonymous terms.

But history and genuine economics clearly illustrate that inflation does not bring about growth, nor does it necessarily lower the unemployment rate. In fact, a rising rate of inflation often leads to higher rates of unemployment. This is the exact opposite of the Phillips Curve dogma held at the Fed, which dictates that a falling unemployment rate is the totality of inflation.

By Michael Pento

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment