tâs not boasting to state plainly that you were right if you are equally direct about your errors. I have until now rightly predicted all of the stock marketâs major downturns, starting with the one in 2007 that gave us the Great Recession. The first of those led to the writing of this blog. The next two were predicted and recorded as they happened on this blog, and the latest, whether it proves right or wrong, waits shortly in the future. Each time I made such a prediction here, I bet my blog on it. The blog is still here, but will it continue to be?
I am using the term âcrashâ loosely in this article because one time I clearly stated the impending plunge would not technically amount to a crash (a sudden drop of more than 20%) but it would be much more significant than just a correction (a decline of 10%) because of how drastically it would change the nature of the market. Iâll show here how it did. The next time, I predicted a âcrashâ that did not quite turn out as significant as I claimed it would be, but it was an historic event in that the Dow fell further in January than it had ever done in its entire history, and it did so exactly the timing (to the day) that I laid out in advance.
I let myself off easy on that one as being both a hit and a miss because, after all, getting timing of a major plunge right to the exact day as well as the counter-intuitive manner by which it would start on that day is not something one typically sees.
Now we are about to see whether I will survive the prediction I made many months ago for January 2018.
The ghost of crashes past
On September 3rd, 2014, I wrote an article titled âWill There be a 2014 Stock Market Crash?â In that article I predicted something big and wicked appeared to be coming right around the corner:
This [prediction] is coming from someone who has not been crying the sky is falling for some timeâ¦.. I wonât go as far as I did with the housing market [back in â07] by predicting a stock-market crash based on the evidence at the moment, but I willÂ say it is looking like a significant risk this fall, should other events trigger panic in stock investors who know they are heavily leveraged and who know everyone else is, too.
That bet sounds a little hedged, but it was merely reiterating what I had predicted in the early spring of that year:
Iâm not predicting economic collapse in 2014 any more than I did last year. Some well-known talking heads did for 2013, especially related to China, and I said theyâd be wrong. Marc Faber, Nouriel Roubini, and Jim Rogers all predicted that 2013 would bring a great crash, and I said that I did not think that was likely. While Iâm not forecasting calamity in my 2014 economic predictions, it certainly looks like a stormy fall ahead of us as these pressures start to build against the global economy. (âStrong Headwinds Face Global Economyâ)
In keeping with that earlier prediction, I concluded my September update for the rapidly approaching autumn months as follows:
I avoid sensationalism or market pessimism, but unlike bullish market optimists I will predict doom when doom really is on the horizon, but not before. I would move the needle on my gauge that monitors the likelihood of an economic crash this year from yellow to solidly orange where I predicted in the spring that it would be come fall.â¦
The sad tale to be seen in the market today is that we haveÂ learned nothing from the economicÂ crash of 2008 and less than nothing from the high-tech crash at the beginning of the millennium. The market is wildly speculative on dot-com stocks and highly leveraged. It has huge potential to fall rapidly ifÂ something goes wrong because the investing is so highly leveraged (built out ofÂ debt). The marketÂ looks exactly like it did before the last bust of the dot-com bubble. Because it is such an unstable situation and because the headwinds that I forecasted last March have grown, the likelihood of that market toppling in the fall has increased.
Every force mentioned in my March forecast hasÂ built up in the directions predicted,Â bringing the risk level for this fall to exactly the precarious level I predicted. Remember, I bet my blog on things taking that direction this past March, promising Iâd stop making forecasts if I was wrong about the directionÂ these headwinds were taking usâ¦.
I maintain that bet whileÂ nearly everyone else is saying the economy has improved this year, and superficially it appears it has; but I am looking at the teetering state of the market and the growing forces of the winds that whirl around us and saying that those who think, based on statistics that the economy is recovering, are all looking in the wrong direction. They are not paying attention toÂ the foundations of this structure, and they are not looking at the sheer forces that are ready to knock it off its wobbly foundation. The economy is, in fact, precariouslyÂ weak, and the forces that could knock it over have grown increasingly strong.
The area in the yellow box below shows what happened less than two weeks after if I reiterated those strong warnings that things were about to go very bad:
I wrote and published the article two weeks before the big dip that took us into the yellow box in the graph above â a time which theÂ authorÂ who published this graph now refers to as âa stealth bear market.â I would later write that, as far as I was concerned, the events that happened that fall broke the spine of the bull market completely (the Trump rally that ended the period in the yellow box being an entirely new phenomenon built on a different basis of speculation). As with the author who published the graph, I disagree with those who say this has all been one long bull market of recovery.
I think I was right about that fall with the perspective one gets when looking back from a distance. If you took all your money out of the stock market at the start of that yellow box, you could have kept it out of the market for almost two years, and you would have missed nothing but a bumpy ride to nowhere. The bull clearly broke its back with that first big plunge in the fall of 2014, never to recover without massive intrusion by a new force in the market.
Technically, the S&P fell 19% by the time that break finished playing out, so it missed becoming an officially declared bear market by a mere nick; but I think it is clear the market broke â¦ like a hurricane that misses being named a hurricane by just one mile per hour. Itâs a naming technicality that doesnât change how bad the storm was. At any rate, I had been smart enough to stop myself short of saying the market would âcrashâ or that total calamity would hit the economy and had predicted, instead, that a market downturn of major significance was about to happen. Clearly it did, so I got to keep writing my blog.
Note that the massive change this event brought to the market was ONLY reversed by the momentous election of Donald Trump and the ensuing Trump Rally. You can see the exact point that happened near the end of the yellow zone above. Without that event, the market would still be churning sideways; but I never said the change I was predicting in 2014 would be apocalyptic or that the market would stay down forever.
As noted then, I also had not predicted anything dire for quite some time prior to that. (Iâm not a permabear, always predicting doom and gloom until it happens.) It took a new major historic event to upset the country and extract us out of that seemingly endless sideways bounce and crawl of the âstealth bearâ that had begun right when I said the market would break.
The ghost of a Christmas crash most recent
The next time I predicted a major downturn in the market was not until December of 2015 when I also bet my blog on the prediction coming true, and this time I was even more specific. Just a few hours before the Fed raised interest rates for the first time since the official part of the Great Recession, I wrote the following prediction:
Let me share something counter-intuitive.Â Whether the Fed raises interest rates or not, this WednesdayÂ is D-day for the Fedâs economic recovery because the Fed is Damned if it does and Damned if it doesnât. Iâll certainly show you why,Â but the counterintuitive part is that you can expect the market to crash upward as it leaves Wonderland and returns to reality.
Maybe I am a contrarian to contrarians because while I have taken the contrarian view that the recovery is an illusion, most contrarians appear to believe the stock market will crash as soon as the Fed raises rates. I take a counterintuitive view as being most likely. The market will most likely soar, even though raising rates definitely will cause its demise. How is that possible?
Fear of the Fedâs first rate increaseÂ is already priced in as the expectation for Wednesdayâs Fed meeting. If the Fed raises rates,Â I would expect a momentaryÂ pause â a gasp of uncertainty â as investors quickly look around to see if the sky falls. Then when it doesnât fall, they will breath a huge sigh of relief and take that as proof that the contrarians or bears were wrong.Â In sudden euphoricÂ lightness of being theyâll proclaim,Â âWeâre all right! We made it! We survived the day we have been told to fear, and the sky didnât fall.â Worry will give way easilyÂ to euphoria, which wants to happen. The feelingÂ of nothing can stop us now will take the day. The Fedâs plan worked; things didnât fall apart as the prophets of doom and gloom said. We are well on our way!
But what do you know about euphoria and human beings? In my experience, euphoria is more often divorced fromÂ reality than based upon it. It skews perception of reality, and usuallyÂ comes inÂ a manic-depressive wave. First you are washed over by the crest of euphoria and then you are sucked down into the trough of despairâ¦.
The economy doesnât crash because the Fed ends its free interest. The economy is already sinking. What crashes is the illusion of recovery. December 16, 2015, is D-day because itâs the day when reality starts to sink inâ¦.
[The market] may bounce in euphoria over the simple reliefÂ that it didnât immediately crash when the fuel tap was shut off, but that death spasm canât last long with nothing leftÂ to lift prices upâ¦. you will very soon be able to look back and see that this day, Wednesday, December 16, was the turning point. (âThe Epocalypse: What Will D-Day Look Like?â)
And what happened? You have to look no further than the yellow box in the graph above. I made my prediction in the period between the two deep plunges inside the yellow box. The market nudged up on December 15th right after the Fedâs announced its increase, then it shot up a lot more on the 16th; but then it stumbled and fell on the 17th â 19th. The bulls tried to rally one last time, then walked off a cliff in January in what became the biggest January plunge in market history.
But here is the part where I have to also say where I was wrong. While I was right to the day about the timing and about how the ups and downs would play out, I was greatly wrong in stating that it would lead into an economic calamity I called âthe Epocalypse.â It did not.
I kept writing my blog, however, because most of it had happened exactly as I said it would, though not to the degree that I had predicted. It was more of an overstated hit than a miss. Unlike the first bet where I resisted the doom and gloom, this time I had gone too far into the glooming. Still, it was a record plunge that January, and itÂ did become the lowest point in the period designated above as the âstealth bear market.â It was a lot closer than anyone elseâs call had been.
The ghost of a crash soon to be
My final time in betting my blog (because I choose to put my money where my mouth is) was this year when I bet the economy would show serious signs of breaking down by summer and stated where the cracks would begin to show. In addition to laying out the exact fault lines that would show up in the summer, I predicted the stock market would crash in the fall or more likely in January of 2018, but no later than that.
Now itâs time for me to say, âLetâs watch what happens.â Things clearly arenât looking good for me this time around, but hang around long enough to see how it plays out.
But first, about those major cracks that I said would show up in the summer. Three of the major cracks that I said were likely to emerge were the retail apocalypse, the beginning of a slow decline in the housing market and a crash in the auto market. All of those things became evident last summer, just when I said they would. Then, however, the hurricanes and wildfires hit. I noted the severity and spread of that destruction would probably turn the housing market and the auto market around for the next year or two.
Obviously, I cannot see hurricanes coming as rescue wagons that will thwart my predictions, but such is the risk of making economic predictions. There can be unexpected white swans, just as there can be black ones. Iâm not suggesting those catastrophes are ultimately good for the nation in the long run; but just like a wartime economy, they can light the economy on fire by forcing all kinds of spending. Thus, they greatly accelerate the velocity of money as much as they accelerate the velocity of air.
I pointed out before any statistics came in that these would would postpone the events I had predicted and that had already begun to show. So, I didnât wait to alter that prediction until after the fact. Simply put, you cannot wipe out or badly damage nearly a million houses and nearly a million automobiles without all of those having to be replaced as quickly as possible. As most were likely insured, so most would be replaced in the fall and winter and on into the spring of 2018. In fact, rebuilding so many houses will take a couple of years.
Some people would rebuild homes once the cleanup was over; as many as possible would soak up surviving houses that were already on the market (driving up the price of those limited available homes) because they needed something to live in right away. The supply of existing homes in those areas, however, would be very limited; so many people would have no choice but to relocate to other regions in order to find immediate housing. The hurricanes would create a lot of demand for both new and old homes and would fill up a lot of vacant apartments but would also press people into other states to find housing.
Itâs hard, maybe impossible, to quantify how much of the housing resurgence throughout the US is due to the hurricanes as well as to the wildfires that have been destroying homes in California since last summer, but such vast swaths of destruction clearly has to have a major impact on the housing market when you are talking a sudden need for a million replacement homes and a million replacement cars. That will certainly drive up the prices for both new and used homes and cars. So, those industries, which did start to reveal signs of decline in the summer have been greatly shored up on the backs of insurance companies and US debt in the form of relief â¦ for now.
Nevertheless, a betâs a bet. Events that were often described by the media as apocalyptic in scale swept in out of the blue and shook the whole economy by creating a need for all kinds of replacement goods beyond just houses and cars. They stirred the pot rapidly and turned up the heat by adding fire and air, forcing the velocity of money to heat up everywhere.
However, a major part of my bet was also that the stock market would crash in the late fall or January of 2018. If that turns out as predicted, I will claim I had a lot more significant hits than misses, given that the misses have reasonable justification, too. In which case, Iâll stay in the blog-writing business. If the market doesnât crash, however, then then the balance tips in favor of the misses, and Iâm out.
Of course, my market predictions look unlikely. Something else I did not see with any clarity (but then neither did anyone else) was that the Trump rally in the stock market would last so long or climb so breathlessly high. But here it is. The anticipatory phase of the rally is all in. Thatâs why we have a noticeable lull now that the Trump tax cuts have been approved at a time when we might normally expect a Santa-Clause rally. There is no more pricing in happening.
Those new tax breaks will start to come in just a few days from now, and I anticipate the market will fall when those breaks become the law under which people are selling stocks. If I could revise my bet, Iâd be tempted to say that fall will no longer end the rally, but the first monthâs transition from anticipating to experiencing life under the new laws will likely be rough. There is probably a lot of sea to move through this passage. I cannot revise my bet, of course; but Iâm just saying the unforeseen strength of the Trump rally would cause me to take some of the direness out of the fall that I anticipated if I could.
The market experienced enormous overheating (like no one has ever seen before) during the long Trump Rally, which lasted much longer than I predicted it would (but, then again, much longer and higher than even the most optimistic bulls predicted). Trumpâs tax changes will definitely stimulate the market in the year ahead; but Januaries are slump months more often than boom months, and there is good reason to think investors are ready to catch their breath and secure some profits out of the market after that long, exhilarating ride â a ride that at the time was entirely speculative because it was based on tax cuts that no one could be sure would happen.
Some profit taking at the end of a year with a rampage like this would make sense. Postponing that profit taking until it can happen under much better tax rules makes even more sense â¦ to me â¦ in a world that increasingly makes little sense because of how rigged markets have become due to central-bank manipulation.Â So, I expect January to be a month of profit-taking, but will that event become bearish enough to save my blog, given that I predicted a stock market crash that would most likely happen in January?
By David Haggith