• 14 hours Bitcoin Could Challenge Gold As Major Asset Class
  • 15 hours Google In Talks With Tencent Over Cloud Business
  • 16 hours Tech Giants Charge Deeper Into $8 Trillion Healthcare Industry
  • 17 hours Lockheed Stock Soars On $480M Pentagon Contract
  • 18 hours Ontario Moves To Slow Cannabis Drive
  • 20 hours The Tech That Will Shape The Future Of Megaprojects
  • 22 hours What Role Will The Saudis Play In Tesla's Private Listing?
  • 2 days Investors Flee Emerging Markets Amid Lira Crisis
  • 2 days Startup Aims To Attract Young Renters With Savvy Tech
  • 2 days The Last Frontier For Artificial Intelligence
  • 2 days EU Companies Struggle To Pick Sides In U.S.-Iran Dispute
  • 2 days Turkey’s Currency Crisis Raises Fears Of Contagion
  • 2 days Could Gold Fall Below $1,000?
  • 2 days Markets Open Higher Despite Ongoing Turkish Crisis
  • 3 days Why Gold Investors Should Ignore The Swings
  • 4 days Stock Buybacks Poised To Eclipse $1 Trillion
  • 5 days Google Accepts Chinese Censorship For Big Payout
  • 5 days Baltics Want to Pull The Plug On Russian Power
  • 5 days Gold Demand In Iran Hits Record Levels
  • 5 days Ride-Sharing: The Next Hotbed For Cybercrime?
Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Writer, Divergente Research LLC

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Divergente Research LLC and Safehaven.com. 

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Breaking News

Senate Votes To Protect Net Neutrality, But What’s Next?

Internet

Obama-era net neutrality rules were upheld by the Senate in a 52-47 vote today, but there is still a long way to go for the opposition of the Federal Communication Commission’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order.

But what are net neutrality rules in the first place? Broadly speaking, the rules are meant to prevent internet services providers (ISPs), especially big fish like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and their ilk, from favoring certain services and apps by allowing them higher rates for quicker speeds and throttling others who don’t pay up.

Under the current rules, a company cannot charge users more to access certain websites or make certain online services faster than others.

Overbearing Regulation

The FCC is set to scrap those old rules, which could plausibly affect how services like Netflix run.

For starters, ISPs might decide to start charging extra to stream movies on Netflix. Alternatively, they might impose a data cap that limits how much a consumer can stream in a month or restrict HD content to higher-tier customers. That's already happening in some countries:

(Click to enlarge)

In an even more ominous outcome, users might find themselves with little choice other than to subscribe to a streaming service owned by the cable giants themselves. This is not as far-fetched as it sounds when you consider that a tie-up between AT&T and Time Warner remains on the cards, something that would leave them in control of much-loved HBO.

Overall, this does not sound like a very good deal for the American consumer, so why on earth would the FCC want to do that?

The organization's main argument against the 2015 rules is that they are too overbearing and stifle innovation and investment.

According to FFC chairman Ajit Pai, a new 'light-touch' framework is necessary to embrace a modern and forward-looking approach that will help the country lead the world in 5G technologies, the next generation of wireless connectivity. Related: Anonymous Cryptos And The Death Of Taxes

As such, the internet will be reclassified as an information service instead of its current status as a utility. ISPs will be allowed to act as toll keepers, prioritize and control traffic, and even block sites. The only major caveat for ISPs is that they will be required to disclose whether they engage in such practices.

Smaller ISPs Cry Foul

Much of the discussion on net neutrality usually focused on giant ISPs like the ones mentioned above.

Yet, it's easy to forget that smaller ISPs matter, too. The country's largest 17 broadband providers serve about 93 percent of the population, with the remaining gap filled by about 3,000 mom-and-pop operations that mainly serve the rural areas. These micro-providers are in many cases the only choice in underserved regions.

In June of 2017, 40 small ISPs sent a letter to the FCC chairman saying that the switch to the old system of things will lead to the cable giants crushing them.

And they are not alone. FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, has lamented the change, saying it's on the 'wrong side of history.' But with Republicans holding a majority in the house and president Trump still having to assent to any changes, the odds are clearly stacked against the Democrats.

By Alex Kimani for Safehaven.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment