• 526 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 528 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 928 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 938 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 939 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 941 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 945 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 945 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 946 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 948 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 952 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 953 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 955 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Bernanke Hints at Near-Term FOMC Pause

In his testimony to the Joint Economic Committee today, Fed Chairman Bernanke sent a strong hint of an imminent FOMC pause in its funds rate increases. Mind you, a May 10 rate hike of 25 basis points is almost a done deal as implied by the following excerpt from Bernanke's prepared comments of today:

"In the statement issued after its March meeting, the FOMC noted that economic growth had rebounded strongly in the first quarter but appeared likely to moderate to a more sustainable pace. It further noted that a number of factors have contributed to the stability in core inflation. However, the Committee also viewed the possibility that core inflation might rise as a risk to the achievement of its mandated objectives, and it judged that some further policy firming may be needed to keep the risks to the attainment of both sustainable economic growth and price stability roughly in balance. In my view, data arriving since the meeting have not materially changed that assessment of the risks." [emphasis added]

The "pause" hint comes from the following excerpts:

"Focusing on the medium-term forecast horizon is necessary because of the lags with which monetary policy affects the economy." [emphasis added]

"In particular, even if in the Committee's judgment the risks to its objectives are not entirely balanced, at some point in the future the Committee may decide to take no action at one or more meetings in the interest of allowing more time to receive information relevant to the outlook. Of course, a decision to take no action at a particular meeting does not preclude actions at subsequent meetings, and the Committee will not hesitate to act when it determines that doing so is needed to foster the achievement of the Federal Reserve's mandated objectives." [emphasis added]

Firstly, from these excerpts we learn that the FOMC is trying to look ahead at likely economic performance rather than just behind at past performance, hence the reference to "the medium-term forecast horizon." Secondly, we learn that the FOMC implicitly appreciates the lagged effects of past interest rate increases when Bernanke states that the FOMC might decide to "take no action" in order to "receive information relevant to the outlook" even if the perceived "risks to its objectives are not entirely balanced." If the FOMC does pause, it does not want the financial markets to prejudge its next policy moves. In order to control these expectations, Bernanke threw in that "a decision to take no action at a particular meeting does not preclude actions at subsequent meetings.

Putting all of this together, along with the FOMC's heightened concern about the housing market, I think there is a better than 50% probability that the FOMC will signal a pause after increasing the funds rate by 25 basis points to 5% at its May 10 meeting.

The Housing Market Environment - Government Stats vs. Company Stats

It was reported yesterday by the Census Bureau that new single-family-home sales rose 13.8% in March. Hmm. All this talk about the housing sector weakening must be just that - talk. But wait a minute. Yesterday afternoon and this morning some large national homebuilding corporations announced their first quarter results. Both Centex and Pulte said their year-overyear new order fell 11%. Centex cut its forecast and Pulte's forecast is below that of the consensus. Beazer reported orders down 19% overall, with a decline of 46% in the West. Government statistics are more likely to be revised than are these results from homebuilders. Believe what you want, folks, but the shaky foundation of the housing industry is showing severe cracks. And, as goes housing, so goes the U.S. economy.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment