• 722 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 722 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 724 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,124 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,129 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,131 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,134 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,134 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,135 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,137 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,137 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,141 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,141 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,142 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,144 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,145 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,148 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,149 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,149 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,151 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

What's the Deal with Bond Yields?

Why have bond yields moved so violently upward this past week? Well, yes, some of the data last week were stronger than expected. But come on, May nonfarm payrolls increasing 157,000, getting a boost from 203,000 assumed (birth/death adjustment) workers being added to unadjusted payrolls, and coming on the heels of an 80,000 increase in April is hardly the stuff of the bond market massacre we have witnessed this week. Central banks around the world raising rates? This is nothing new. And with all due respect to the honorable Reserve Bank of New Zealand, I don't think that a central bank of an economy with a lower GDP than that of Chicago (I'm guessing here), could cause such a stir in the U.S. bond market. Inflation? Last time I looked, inflation was moderating - with or without food and energy. Shift in Fed policy expectations? Yes, two Street firms through in the towel on 2007 Fed rate cuts this week, but they were hold-outs. (Now it is just me and a few other diehards). No, for credible explanation of the exaggerated move in bond yields this week, I think it is Wall Street Journal columnist, Justin Lahart, who has put his finger on it ("Mortgage Jitters May Account For Bond Selloff"). When bond yields started creeping up a few weeks ago, mortgage portfolio prepayment risk started creeping down. This meant that the massive amount of mortgages in portfolios needed fewer non-callable Treasuries as duration maintainers. I am not saying that something perceived to be fundamental by bond investors has not changed. But what Lahart is saying is that the massive duration hedging required by mortgage portfolios acts as a supercharger to fundamentally-induced changes in yields. Remember 1994?

I will, however, add one fundamental factor that may have played a smaller role in this week's bond market selloff - foreign official holdings of U.S. Treasury and Agency securities. As the chart below shows, in the week ended Wednesday, June 6, there was a relatively large $12.5 billion reduction in these custody holdings.

Chart 1

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment