• 525 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 527 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 927 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 937 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 938 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 940 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 944 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 944 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 945 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 947 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 951 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 952 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 954 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

May PPI: Still Scant Evidence of Food/Energy Price Surge Pass-Through

Just like every headline economic statistic of late, the Finished-Goods All-Items PPI increased a greater-than-expected 0.9% in May after a 0.7% rise in April. As the table below shows, another sharp rise in energy prices dominated the increase in finished-goods prices. After six consecutive monthly increases, finished-food prices declined marginally.

As the Chart 1 below vividly illustrates, producer-price inflation has accelerated at the intermediate-goods and finished-goods levels. But Chart 2 shows that food-and-energy-price induced increases in producer prices are not passing through to a large extent so far to the prices of finished producer goods excluding food and energy. In the three months ended May, the "core" Finished-Goods PPI is up at an annualized rate of only 0.75% -- the lowest since September 2006. But Chart 2 does show that core intermediate-goods producer price increases have re-accelerated. There appears to be about a four-month lag between core intermediate-goods inflation and core finished-goods inflation. So, the re-acceleration in core intermediate-goods inflation could lead to a re-acceleration in core finished-goods inflation a few months down the road. That said, the correlation between the two when core intermediate-goods inflation is advanced by four months is only 0.27, suggesting a relatively weak relationship. For the record, there seems to be little relationship between core intermediate-goods producer inflation and core consumer-goods inflation, contemporaneously or leading. Moreover, core consumer-goods wholesale inflation does not show any leading characteristics with regard to core consumer-goods retail inflation.

Chart 1

Chart 2

ess the bottom line of all this is that unless the Fed is more worried about producer inflation than consumer inflation, the May PPI data are not terribly relevant to FOMC policy decisions, with one exception. The medical care component of the PPI increased only 0.1% in May after a 0.2% increase in April. Medical care has a relatively high weight in the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, the presumed Fed-preferred measure of consumer inflation. Therefore, the May core PCE price index would be expected to again show only a relatively small increase as far a medical care costs are concerned.

Upside Surprise on May CPI Could Imply Downside Surprise to Real Retail Sales

If the headline May CPI increase should follow in the footsteps of the May PPI higher-than-expected increase, then there might be a downside surprise to May retail sales. Taking out bar and restaurant sales from total retail sales and deflating that by the PPI for consumer goods, we find that this measure of "real" retail sales increased by only 0.3% in May compared to the 1.5% increase (again, excluding sales of food services) in reported nominal retail sales. On a three-month basis, this measure of real retail sales has contracted 1.1%. See Chart 3 below for the pictorial of all this. But we will have to wait until Friday morning for the CPI report to more accurately gauge the improvement in price-adjusted retail sales.

On the Verge of an Historic First?

On Tuesday, the yield on the Fed's constant-maturity 10-year Treasury security closed at 5.26%, which also was the level of the effective federal funds rate. The reason I mention this is that we may be only one stronger-than-expected economic release away from the yield on the 10-year Treasury security going above the effective federal funds rate. If this positive spread between the Treasury 10-year and the fed funds rate were to be maintained on a monthly average basis, it would be the first time in the history of this series, which dates back to August 1954, that we have gone from a negative spread back to a positive spread without the federal funds rate falling (see Chart 3). Perhaps we do live in a new era?

Chart 3

Unemployment Claimants Higher Than Year-Ago

Looking at unemployment claims on an unadjusted basis, new claims have for the past two weeks once again moved above year-ago levels. Continuing claims persistently have been above year-ago levels since mid February. See Chart 4 for the behavior of claims in 2007. The fact that both new and continuing unemployment insurance claims are above year-ago levels is evidence of a weakening demand for labor. These claims data are about as pure as the driven snow - no seasonal adjustments, no sample, but a universe and no business "birth/death" adjustments.

Chart 4

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment