• 525 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 527 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 927 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 937 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 938 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 940 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 944 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 944 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 945 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 947 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 951 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 952 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 954 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

More on the Coppock Curve Buy Signals of 4/28/78 & 5/30/03

My June 6 communication showed that the 8 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals occurring after 12/1/61 comprise 4 distinct pairs with respect to time path patterns generated by plotting the smoothed CI-NCI Ratio against the inverted and smoothed NYSE TRIN. One of those pairs consists of the signals of 4/28/78 and 5/30/03.

Data permit moving the initial date of investigation from 12/1/61 to 12/27/40. That allows the time paths of 2 additional deep Coppock Curve buy signals (9/30/42 and 8/29/47) to be highlighted on the chart, from the date the smoothed CI-NCI last dipped to 0.9500 to the date of the signal. The time path of the 8/29/47 signal fits the pattern of 1/31/63 and 9/30/82.

The time path of the 9/30/42 signal, on the other hand, fits the pattern of 4/28/67 and 10/31/88.

Thus, even after the addition of 21 early years to the investigation, the 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 signals remain uniquely akin with respect to pattern.

The following chart shows that the 9/30/42 signal was a big winner, but that the 8/29/47 signal was about 2 years early.

Most later signals were big winners. However, 4/28/78 was not. The outcome of the 5/30/03 signal remains to be seen.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment