• 1 day How Taxpayers Are Bankrolling The EV Revolution
  • 2 days The Coronavirus Is Crushing China’s Car Market
  • 3 days Fighting For Survival In The Streaming War
  • 4 days Want A Job? Forget About A Bachelor’s Degree
  • 4 days Another Major Car Maker Is Backing Hydrogen
  • 5 days Are Americans Finally Sold On Soccer?
  • 5 days Is The Tech Bubble About To Burst?
  • 6 days Coronavirus Could Cost Tourism Industry $80 Billion
  • 6 days What Web Traffic Trends Can Tell Us About The World
  • 6 days Miners Face Greater Headwinds
  • 7 days Boris Johnson Proposes Billion Dollar Bridge To Northern Ireland
  • 8 days Goldman Slashes Oil Price Forecast By $10
  • 9 days Tesla Raises $2 Billion In Share Selloff
  • 10 days What The T-Mobile Takeover Of Sprint Really Means For Markets
  • 10 days The U.S. Has Charged Huawei With Racketeering And Conspiracy
  • 10 days How Hydrogen Could Become The Fuel Of The Future
  • 11 days Millennials Can’t Retire, But They’ll Still Have To Help Their Parents
  • 11 days This Gold Miner Just Increased Its Dividends By 40%
  • 11 days Airbnb IPO Under Threat As China's Economy Drags
  • 12 days The Infamous Equifax Hack Just Became A National Security Issue
What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Coppock Curve Buy Signals of 4/28/78 & 5/30/03: A True Pair?

In my June 2 communication I pointed out that the deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals of 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 are uniquely akin in that they are the only 2 since the 1920's which are not preceded within 600 trading days by the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio dipping to 0.9500 or less.

In my June 6 communication I showed that the 8 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals since 12/1/61 pair themselves off into 4 time path patterns with respect to plotting the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio against the inverted Six by Ten TRIN. One of those pairs consists of 4/28/78 and 5/30/03.

Are 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 a pair mainly because of the obvious pairing of the other 6 signals?

Consider all 13 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals since 3/31/25:

Consider those same 13 signals on a line chart showing the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio since 8/17/26:

Three of the 13 signals (8/31/32, 8/31/70, and 1/31/75) take place while the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio is below 0.9500.

Eight of the remaining signals (7/30/38, 6/30/41, 9/30/42, 8/29/47, 1/31/63, 4/28/67, 9/30/82, and 10/31/88) take place no more than 275 trading days after the last instance of the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio being at or less than 0.9500.

The remaining 2 signals (4/28/78 and 5/30/03) occur 789 and 722 trading days, respectively, after the last instance of the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio being at or less than 0.9500.

When the 789 trading days ending on 4/28/78 and the 722 trading days ending on 5/30/03 are plotted together on a scatter chart, using as coordinates the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio and the inverted Six by Ten TRIN, any shared pattern is too complex for the eye to detect.

Isolating the inverted Six by Ten TRIN helps...

...as does isolating the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio:

In my very unscientific opinion there is enough similarity to say that 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 are a true pair with respect to the pattern of their pre-signal time paths.

So what?

Maybe they will share a POST-signal time path pattern too.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment