• 6 hours S&P 500 Officially In An Earnings Recession
  • 10 hours Miners Are Weathering The Trade War Storm
  • 13 hours UK Credit Card Interest Rates Are Skyrocketing
  • 1 day From Frenzy To Flop, The Death Of This Year’s Most Hyped IPO
  • 1 day Are Smart TVs Spying On Us?
  • 2 days Is Fossil Fuel Divestment A Waste Of Time?
  • 2 days A Russian Billionaire’s Space Quest To Save Humanity
  • 2 days Markets Take Breather As Consolidation Continues
  • 2 days Economic Woes Weigh On Copper Prices
  • 3 days World's Largest IPO At Risk Following Drone Strikes
  • 3 days Gold Is Beating Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway
  • 3 days What’s Behind The Silver Sell-Off?
  • 4 days The Retail Apocalypse Is Accelerating
  • 4 days The Top Tech Stocks Of The Year
  • 4 days America’s Workforce Elderly Workforce To Double By 2028
  • 5 days Toyota Tests Solar-Powered Prius
  • 5 days Why The Gold Rally Flatlined
  • 6 days The Uranium Sector Can’t Catch A Break
  • 6 days Upcoming Fed Meeting Has Investors On Edge
  • 7 days Global Gold Sector Outlines Responsible Mining Principles
Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

During the quarter there were…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Coppock Curve Buy Signals of 4/28/78 & 5/30/03: A True Pair?

In my June 2 communication I pointed out that the deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals of 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 are uniquely akin in that they are the only 2 since the 1920's which are not preceded within 600 trading days by the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio dipping to 0.9500 or less.

In my June 6 communication I showed that the 8 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals since 12/1/61 pair themselves off into 4 time path patterns with respect to plotting the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio against the inverted Six by Ten TRIN. One of those pairs consists of 4/28/78 and 5/30/03.

Are 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 a pair mainly because of the obvious pairing of the other 6 signals?

Consider all 13 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals since 3/31/25:

Consider those same 13 signals on a line chart showing the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio since 8/17/26:

Three of the 13 signals (8/31/32, 8/31/70, and 1/31/75) take place while the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio is below 0.9500.

Eight of the remaining signals (7/30/38, 6/30/41, 9/30/42, 8/29/47, 1/31/63, 4/28/67, 9/30/82, and 10/31/88) take place no more than 275 trading days after the last instance of the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio being at or less than 0.9500.

The remaining 2 signals (4/28/78 and 5/30/03) occur 789 and 722 trading days, respectively, after the last instance of the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio being at or less than 0.9500.

When the 789 trading days ending on 4/28/78 and the 722 trading days ending on 5/30/03 are plotted together on a scatter chart, using as coordinates the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio and the inverted Six by Ten TRIN, any shared pattern is too complex for the eye to detect.

Isolating the inverted Six by Ten TRIN helps...

...as does isolating the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio:

In my very unscientific opinion there is enough similarity to say that 4/28/78 and 5/30/03 are a true pair with respect to the pattern of their pre-signal time paths.

So what?

Maybe they will share a POST-signal time path pattern too.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment