• 527 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 527 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 529 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 929 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 933 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 935 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 938 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 939 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 940 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 941 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 942 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 946 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 946 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 947 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 949 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 949 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 953 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 953 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 954 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 956 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

A Stock Market Bottom

Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on 24th January 2008.

As noted in the email we sent to subscribers following Tuesday's (22nd January) dramatic US trading session:

"There were more than 1100 new lows on the NYSE on Tuesday, which is something that has only happened on four prior occasions over the past 40 years. It happened in May of 1973; it happened on the day of the 1987 stock market crash; it happened on 31st August 1998 (the day of the US stock market's bottom during the 1998 financial crisis); and it happened at the peak of last August's financial market panic."

We will now take a look at the situations mentioned above with the aid of charts from the excellent Decisionpoint.com web site.

The first chart shows the most recent two occasions when the number of new lows on the NYSE exceeded 1100, including this week's event. Notice that the '1100+ new lows day' in August of last year was followed by a strong 2-month advance to a new all-time high, after which the market embarked on the downward trend that led to this week's selling climax. Last year's dramatic surge in new lows was actually the 'odd man out' in the historical record in that it wasn't followed, within three months, by a successful test of the bottom reached on the day of the selling climax.

The next chart highlights the bottoming process during the 1998 financial crisis. For all intents and purposes the stock market reached its ultimate correction low on 31st August 1998 -- the day on which the number of new lows was greater than 1100. Notice, though, that the 31st August bottom was tested about 6 weeks later.

Moving along to the famous 1987 selling climax depicted on the chart presented below, notice, again, that the NYSE Composite Index returned to test its panic low before a sustained advance got underway.

Last, but certainly not least, we'll take a look at a chart showing the dramatic May-1973 surge in new lows and its aftermath. The chart displayed below reveals that the selling climax near the end of May-1973 -- as marked by new lows surging to more than 1100 -- was followed by a choppy rebound that lasted about 5 months. The market then returned to its downward path.

Although the recent decline was much steeper than the one that led to the May-1973 selling climax, we think it makes the most sense to compare the current situation with 1973. The reason is that the May-1973 selling climax, like this week's selling climax, occurred in the midst of a secular (very long-term) bear market, whereas the 1987 and 1998 climaxes occurred within the context of a secular bull market.

As an aside, for the past seven years we've consistently maintained that US equities are mired in a secular bear market as defined by long-term downward trends in VALUATIONS (P/E ratios, etc.) and REAL prices (gold-denominated prices). In a high-inflation world it is very important to define the long-term trend in this way, rather than in terms of nominal dollar prices, because it is purchasing power and not monetary value that matters. For example, if the US stock market were rising at 5% per year while the US$ were losing purchasing power at the rate of 10% per year then it would not, in our opinion, be reasonable to claim that US stocks were in a bull market. What we would have, in that situation, is a bear market in the dollar as opposed to a bull market in equities. To say otherwise is to say, in effect, that a million dollars is a million dollars regardless of whether it can buy a beautiful house in the best part of town or an ice-cream.

In any case, even if we assume the bearish 1973 parallel the historical record suggests that the stock market has just made a low that will not be decisively breached for at least 5 months.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment