• 15 hours $12M Seized in Massive US-Dubai Money-Laundering Raid
  • 2 days China Launches Digital Yuan As U.S. Dallies
  • 6 days Squid Game Rampage Fails to Lift Netflix Stock After Stellar Earnings
  • 6 days Why Tesla, EV Stocks, Could Remain Highly Volatile For Years
  • 8 days Did Big Bank Earnings Just Signal ‘Real’ Economic Recovery?
  • 9 days The Cannabis Industry Is Looking To Fill The Employment Gap
  • 9 days Apple Capitalizes On Upward Momentum Ahead Of Earnings
  • 12 days Earnings Beat Isn’t Enough for S&P 500 Q3
  • 14 days The New World Tax Order
  • 15 days Is Crypto Finally Ready To Pay The Piper?
  • 16 days Is It Time To Buy The Global Gaming Market Dip?
  • 19 days Even The Mafia Has A Millennial Problem
  • 21 days Zuckerberg Loses Billions in Social Media Outage
  • 22 days ‘Pandora Papers’ Leak Reveals More Financial Crime
  • 23 days US Retail Has A Major Supply Chain Problem
  • 26 days China Has Set Out To Crush Crypto...Again
  • 27 days Top Performing Cannabis Stocks of the Year
  • 28 days Millennials Could Power A 20-Year Bull Stock Market
  • 33 days The Million-Dollar Question: Will China Bail Out Evergrande?
  • 35 days Bitcoin Is Driven By Testosterone
U.S. Cannabis Space Heats Up With Telling Tilray Acquisition

U.S. Cannabis Space Heats Up With Telling Tilray Acquisition

“Until legalization does happen, we…

Is Robinhood The Next Meme Stock To Explode?

Is Robinhood The Next Meme Stock To Explode?

Robinhood launched its IPO on…

Chinese Tech Billionaires Get Charitable Amid Beijing Crackdown

Chinese Tech Billionaires Get Charitable Amid Beijing Crackdown

China’s Big Tech billionaires have…

  1. Home
  2. Investing
  3. Stocks

U.S. Tech Stocks Look Increasingly Vulnerable

US Tech Stocks

Stocks are at an inflection point.

After a bruising end to 2018, the major indices caught fire at the turn of the New Year as the world's central banking cartel leapt into action. Here's how the US Federal Reserve reacted:

(Click to enlarge)

The central banks have more than demonstrated that they are now subservient to the markets. Losses will not be tolerated

Which is why the chart below by Sven Henrich goes far in explaining why they've been in full panic mode this year: a major long-term technical breakdown threatened. As prices fell in later 2018, the S&P 500 broke through a trendline that had remained unviolated since the markets began recovering from the Great Financial Crisis in 2009:

(Click to enlarge)

As Sven has been doing an excellent job of monitoring, this violated trendline may now have flipped from "support" to "ceiling" for the S&P. 

Which may be why we were treated to not just one, but three Federal Reserve chairs during last weekend's episode of 60 Minutes. Their triple-strength "all is well" show of force was good enough to juice the S&P back up to the long-term trendline this week -- but not convincingly through it.

The market looks very much paused at the brink of a breakout here.

The bulls are expecting a sharp rebound in GDP from Q1, which they claim was artificially low due the government shutdown. They point to 2018's solid 3 percent economic growth, claiming the US is humming along fine and about to get a shot of adrenaline once America and China announced an end to their trade war. In their eyes, the S&P is poised to rocket higher once it punches vigorously above 2820.

The bears see a topping out of a classic bear market rally, one that has been propelled by no convincing fundamentals -- only central bank jawboning/easing and continued massive buyback programs (plus this week's rare Quad Witching options expiration). They see an extremely overbought market, with stocks ready to break down to new lows for the year.

Which Way From Here?

If we look over at the bond markets, we see no confirmation at all of the recent exuberance in equities, especially the melt-up seen this week:

(Click to enlarge)

When the bond and stock markets disagree, it's usually the (much larger) bond market that has it right.

Moreover, many analysts, including Goldman Sachs' volatility trader Moran Freeman, are predicting a near-term resurgence in the VIX, which would correlate with lower stock prices.

Returning to Sven Henrich's charts, here he shows how we've been seeing a successive pairing of descending wedges for volatility (predictive of upside breakouts) and ascending wedges for the S&P (predictive of downward breakdowns). The tighter the wedges, the more compression they have to force prices to move quickly when they break:

(Click to enlarge)

(Source)

This week, the VIX hit its lowest level ($12.50) of 2019. This suggests a reversal is much more likely going forward -- possibly as high as $50 -- than continued suppression.

And beyond the technical arguments, the fundamentals underlying the markets are on their way from bad to worse.

DoubleLine's Jeff Gundlach basically vomited on the bull case in his latest macro market outlook, optimistically-titled Highway To Hell (well worth the viewing). In it, he noted how global economic indicators are falling off a cliff at this point:

(Click to enlarge)

And in terms of stocks specifically, he emphasizes that despite the early ramp-up this year, the S&P "was and is in a bear market", and that he predicts stocks will take out the December low during the course of 2019 and markets will roll over earlier than they did last year.

GMO's Jeremy Grantham sounds a similar warning, albeit a longer-looking one. Grantham, who has been expecting a meltdown in stocks since last year, not only sees the US stocks as overpriced -- he predicts they will deliver sub-par returns for the next two decades that will "break of lot of hearts" among today's investors.

Tech Looking Especially Vulnerable

I wrote several reports last year warning of dangerous overvaluation of the FAANG stocks, which had yet to show any weakness at that time. I went as far as to issue a rare notice that I was building a short position against these stocks, one rewarded with a 50 percent return when successfully exited three months later.

If anything, the big Tech stocks look even more vulnerable now than they did back then.

The NASDAQ (of which the FAANG stocks comprise the majority of the index's market cap) has rocketed up over 20 percent since its December lows, sitting now just 5 percent below its all-time high.  Related: Germany’s Flirtation With Recession Could Cripple The Global Economy

This surge in value is starkly contradicted by the negative developments arising for these companies in 2019. Here are just a few recent ones:

Senator and presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren is proposing much tougher regulation, specifically calling for the breakup of AmazonGoogle and Facebook. She's also making the case that Apple should be prevented from selling apps on the App Store it operates. Politicians and regulators in the EU are making similar arguments.

- Two of Facebook's key executives (it's Chief Product Officer and the head of WhatsApp) just resigned,right as the company faces a criminal probe into past security and privacy scandals.

- Apple's iPhone sales dropped worldwide last year, falling 12 percent in the critical holiday FYQ4 quarter. Since then, smartphone demand in China has been falling off a cliff -- at its lowest in years.

- Netflix is still burning cash at a horrifying pace while large competitors are readying to provide consumers with compelling alternatives. Disney recently announced its streaming service will include its entire movie catalog (soon to include Fox's, as well), for a cheaper price than Netflix. Apple is expected to launch its service in May, and be free. 

- Google and Facebook are under threat of multi-billion dollar fines in the UK if they fail to rid their platforms of "toxic content". Google is also fending off similar fines in ChinaIndia and France.

I could easily go on. But do the above headwinds (along with a Q1 2019 US economy growing at a pitiful 0.4 percent) justify Tech stock prices kissing their all-time highs?

No. Not even close.

Which is why I'm moving a percentage of my "dry powder" cash savings into a new short position at this time, one larger than I placed last year. It's not a move I take lightly (and as usual, this is NOT personal financial advice). I'm only doing it because, in my estimation, the preponderance of evidence for a near-term reversal is overwhelming my strong default risk-averse preference to sit on the sidelines.

By Adam Taggart via Peak Prosperity 

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment