• 319 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 324 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 326 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 329 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 329 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 330 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 332 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 332 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 336 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 336 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 337 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 339 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 340 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 343 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 344 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 344 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 346 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 347 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 350 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 351 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Economy

Senate Grills Big Banks Over Pandemic Opportunism


Despite their Hallmark-esque TV commercials highlighting their customer-first priorities, banks aren’t exactly the wider public’s favorite institution, and the aftermath of the pandemic is bringing into clearer focus. 

Even though banks are singing their own praises with regard to their handling of the pandemic, with plenty of odes to their efforts to help out those in need, the Federal government doesn’t necessarily agree. 

Earlier this week, the six largest bank CEOs appeared before the Senate for a banking committee hearing on the oversight of Wall Street firms. The focal point was the fact that the COVID-19 crisis did not threaten bank profitability; yet, banks failed to do much of anything to help out ordinary people during the pandemic.

Unlike the 2008 financial crisis, when 27 banks went under, the pandemic barely touched the six largest banks from a comparative perspective. 

The industry as a whole posted $147.9 billion in profits in 2020, which is a 36.5% decline from the prior year. And unlike other industries, the six biggest banks posted decent profits in 2020, led by JPMorgan with $29.1 billion, Bank of America with $17.9 and Wells Fargo with $3.1 billion.

And when the economy started to recover at the end of last year, banks did, too--many of them beating estimates for Q1 2021.

In addition to that, most bank CEOs saw their paychecks inflated in 2020.

Still, the CEOs told the Senate Banking Committee that they helped small business owners and  worked to narrow the racial wealth gap, among other things.

Senator Elizabeth Warren wasn’t buying it. She called such statements of charity by big banks "a bunch of baloney."

"No matter how you try to spin it, this past year has shown that corporate profits are more important to your bank than offering just a little help to struggling families even when we're in the middle of a worldwide crisis," Warren said.

Warren and other Democratic senators viewed the high bank profits as a sign that banks collected excessive amounts of fees and interest from consumers and businesses during the pandemic.

The banks typically charge overdraft fees when the customer overdraws on their checking account. Rather than allowing a debit card to be declined or a check to bounce, the bank will cover the difference and charge an overdraft fee, usually about $30 to $35.

The Senate particularly focused on JPMorgan Chase’s policy of overdraft fees, saying the bank collected $1.46 billion in overdraft fees during the crisis. 

But JPMorgan is not alone in it as America’s big banks make more than $11 billion worth of overdraft and related fees every year.

While a few banks decided to waive those fees (overdraft banking fees, specifically), it still cost consumers $12.4 billion in 2020.  Without stimulus payments, estimates are that losses would have been triple last year as overdrafts would have been far more frequent. 

None of the 10 largest banks offered any sustained relief from overdraft fees during the crisis.

On the contrary, last yearTD Bank agreed to pay $122 million to settle claims related to overdraft abuse. Then, in March, Bank of America agreed to pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of extracting overdraft fees it didn't earn from customers.

Several studies on the subject reach a consensus: Most overdraft fees are paid by Americans with low credit scores, people of color and by Americans living in relatively low-income neighborhoods. 

By Michael Kern for Safehaven.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment