• 5 days Quantum Computing Is The Newest Megatrend In Silicon Valley
  • 6 days How To Invest In The Cybersecurity Boom
  • 8 days Investors Are Patient With Unprofitable Giants
  • 10 days Wells Fargo Back In The Scandal Spotlight Once Again
  • 12 days 5 Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On This Year
  • 13 days As Auto Giants Flail, Look To Chip Stocks For Gains
  • 14 days Central America Is Ready For The Bitcoin Hustle
  • 16 days China’s Video Game Restrictions Unlikely To Slow Down Booming Industry
  • 17 days Top Performing Stocks As Inflation Fears Grow
  • 18 days US Airline Stocks Take A Beating On New EU Restrictions
  • 19 days This IPO Could Open Sustainable Fashion Floodgates
  • 20 days Crypto Crime Nets Another $2B Fraudster
  • 22 days This Week’s Hottest Meme Stocks
  • 23 days Why World Markets Should Be Watching Germany Closely
  • 25 days Could ‘Cultured’ Meat Rival The Plant-Based Megatrend?
  • 28 days ‘Easy Money’: Crypto Is Still Attracting Newbie Investors
  • 29 days Foreign Syndicates May Have Stolen Up To $400B In COVID Benefits
  • 30 days Gold Jumps Above $1800 Ahead Of Jackson Hole Summit
  • 30 days International Banks Blacklist Afghanistan Following Taliban Takeover
  • 32 days China’s Tycoons Are Getting A Serious Reality Check
Senate Grills Big Banks Over Pandemic Opportunism

Senate Grills Big Banks Over Pandemic Opportunism

Unlike the 2008 financial crisis,…

Consumer Price Index Hits 13-Year-High

Consumer Price Index Hits 13-Year-High

Goldman Sachs shares the Fed’s…

Get Ready For First Tax Hike Since 1993

Get Ready For First Tax Hike Since 1993

The $1.9-trillion COVID-19 stimulus act…

Fred Dunkley

Fred Dunkley

Writer, Safehaven.com

Fred Dunkley is a tech analyst, writer, and seasoned investor. Fred has years of experience covering global markets and geopolitics. 

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Economy

The Crushing Reality Of Poverty In America

Poverty In America

“When the laws undertake… to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society… have a right to complain of the injustice to their Government,” former U.S. president Andrew Jackson wrote in his 1832 bank veto message.  Since then, his words have inspired the frequent use of the catchphrase “the rich are becoming richer, and the poor poorer” in everything from poetry and political campaigns to music. 

Most recently, it is the focal point of a new study by the Center on Poverty and Social Policy (CPSP) at Columbia University.

But there’s a new twist: “inflation inequality.

And that new twist suggests that America has 3.2 million more people living in poverty than traditional statistics really show. 

The authors argue that the main generator of inflation inequality is income inequality, which has seen companies cater to the needs of the top earners, with luxury product prices getting lower.

“Because companies are increasingly interested in competing for the dollars of wealthy individuals, prices for goods that wealthy people buy are actually decreasing relative to the prices of goods that lower-income families purchase,” the study argues. 

The same is not true for low-income products. In fact, lower-income consumers end up paying proportionately more than they did before.

It’s the idea of Walmart for the wealthy, in other words. 

By way of example, craft beer is getting cheaper, while watered-down beer that comes in 30-pack hasn’t seen any decrease in price. 

The study also claims that not only have rising prices quietly been taxing low-income families more heavily than rich ones, but also that, after accounting for that trend, the American poverty rate is significantly higher than the official measures suggest. 

Low-income families experienced an annual rate of inflation conservatively estimated at 0.44 percentage points higher than that of high-income families, the study says. 

Inflation hits middle-class families harder, too, with the average middle-income household having lost about $1,250 in purchasing power last year. 

And low-income households that don’t have access to government support programs because their income isn’t low enough end up facing much higher costs of living.

Using their inflation measure, the paper’s authors estimate that 3.2 million more people would fall below the poverty line, bringing the total to 41.4 million.

Falling below the poverty line is dangerously easy, too. 

Related: The Relatively Of Money And Happiness

As witnessed during the partial government shutdown earlier this year, missing a single paycheck can throw a household into financial uncertainty. Despite the lowest unemployment rate in decades and a stable economy, new data shows that 4 of 10 Americans are one missed paycheck away from poverty.

A report by think-tank Prosperity Now found that 40 percent of American households are “liquid asset poor”. They don’t have enough money saved away to make ends meet at the poverty level should their income be suddenly interrupted. Last year, that percentage was 36.8.

Now, 13 percent of U.S. households have fallen behind on bills, and nearly one-third have zero savings. Close to 40 percent have no money put aside for an emergency. 

Yes, the jobless rate of 3.5 percent as of late October is the lowest since December 1969; but hourly wages haven’t increased much, and prices have risen significantly in the past year, especially for gas and rent. 

Adjusted for inflation, workers’ wages grew 0.6 percent over the year. Annual inflation was 2.3 percent in September, according to the Labor Department.

What does it all mean? It means that poverty is creeping up on America, and the official measures don’t tell the whole story. There’s a major Catch 22 when we consider those Americans who earn too much to qualify for subsidized or free health care or other benefits. Simply by not qualifying, they have slipped into poverty. 

The numbers appear to be skewed. America is poorer than you think. 

 By Fred Dunkley for Safehaven.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • herk on November 26 2019 said:
    LOL, "Inflation hits middle-class families harder, too, with the average middle-income household having lost about $1,250 in purchasing power last year. "

    My income as a disabled veteran is about 9% higher than in 2009, my cost of living is about 50% higher since then, and costs here are risding at double digit levels which I remember so well from my time in the Air Force when it was over 12% and we got 1-2% raises each year. Rent alone in this county is up 90% just in the last 5 years.

    I take home just over $50k net, tax exempt, and it covers about as much purchasing as $25k did in 2009. I am practicaly debt free other than my 15k car loan, and my medical is covered by the VA with no copays, deductibles, premiums or expenses of any kind, yet I can see 2020 as the year I go homeless. That is just how bad housing costs have risen. Just the damned laundromat alone now takes over $5 for a washer and another $2.75 for drying, gasoline leaves the refinery at $1.64 (includes federal taxes) yet it manages to be $3.299 by the time it gets to the pumps, historic markup that is over 100%. Aside from a very few exceptions food in general is up about 50% since 2009, but many items have more than doubled. Take sugar, inspite of declining global sugar prices we have seen the 5 pound bag become a 4 pound bag, and the price rise from $1.39 to $2.49 even though sugar is still 12 cents per pound to the companies that bag it. That means a 4 pound bag of sugar has 48 cents worth of actual sugar, and the bag costs you $2.

    It is not all pure profit of course, a lot of the increases are driven not by supply and demand, but by the financialization of the economy in which speculators rule, and where corporations are using extreme amounts of debt to run their operations, that means a lot more debt service, prices rise.

    But, if $50k take home was entry level middle class in 2009 and now rates as just a few notes whistled past the graveyard of homelessness then how the hell are the vast majority getting by? Because my income is actually slightly above the median for a single head of household.

Leave a comment