• 210 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 215 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 217 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 220 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 220 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 221 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 222 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 223 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 227 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 227 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 228 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 230 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 231 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 234 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 235 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 235 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 237 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 238 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 241 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 242 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
Is The Dollar Too Strong?

Is The Dollar Too Strong?

The U.S. dollar has been…

Another Strong Jobs Report, But Is It Enough?

Another Strong Jobs Report, But Is It Enough?

Just released, the February jobs…

Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace

Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace

Job openings and the level…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Economy

Trade Tensions Weigh On South Korea, Japan Relations

Trade Tensions

Most Americans could be forgiven for thinking that the 'trade war' is really only impacting the US and (maybe) China. After all, it was President Trump's belligerent rhetoric about holding China accountable that helped him win in 2016 in the first place. But what is less known, is that Trump's angry trade rhetoric aggravated a bunch of other longstanding trade spats, most notably, the now-emergent trade spat between Japan and South Korea, which is threatening to seriously disrupt trade throughout the Pacific Rim region.

Now, according to the Nikkei Asian Review, in the latest sign of how the relationship between the two countries has deteriorated, South Korea has decided not to extend an intelligence-sharing agreement with Japan.

The decision was reportedly made at a National Security Council meeting on Thursday at South Korea's "Blue House." South Korea said it no longer believes the agreement is "in its national interest" after Japan excluded South Korea from the "so-called" "White Countries' list".

Kim Yu-keun, the National Security Office's deputy director, said: "We thought that it is not in our national interest to maintain the agreement," adding that, "We will inform the Japanese government through diplomatic channels by the deadline of the extension, according to the agreement."

Kim said: "The government estimated that the Japanese government caused a critical change in the circumstances of security cooperation between the two countries by excluding our country from the so-called white countries' list...with no clear evidence, on Aug. 2."

For the record, that 'white countries' list? It's not what it sounds like. The timing of the pact's termination is also interesting because of North Korea resuming its short-range missile tests, as well as its threats to call off peace talks with the South and the US.

Yoshihide Suga, Japan's chief cabinet secretary, late last month said that Tokyo wanted to maintain the pact, known as the General Security of Military Information Agreement.

The neighbors signed the agreement in 2016 out of a desire to cooperate in the face of an increasing threat from North Korea.

The agreement stipulates how the countries can share military intelligence.

SK's decision not to extend the pact follows a meeting between the two countries foreign ministers in Beijing, where South

Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha demanded that Japan rescind its decision.

The decision came one day after South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha met with her Japanese counterpart, Taro Kono, in Beijing. South Korea's foreign ministry said Kang had expressed regret in regard to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's decision to exclude South Korea from its "whitelist" of trusted trading partners earlier this month. She urged Tokyo to withdraw the decision that makes it more cumbersome for South Korean companies to import certain materials from Japan.

Related: Trickle Down Tax Cuts Aren't Helping Bolster GDP Growth

Unsurprisingly (since NAR is a Tokyo-based business newspaper), most of the analysts quoted in the piece seem to think South Korea's decision is a bad idea.

Analysts say Seoul should be careful about escalating the feud to include the intelligence agreement, which benefits both countries.

"We had better keep the agreement," Lee Su-hoon, a professor at Kyungnam University and a former ambassador to Japan, said at a forum. "We need military information. However, sharing high-class information should be based on trust."

Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul said in the report: "The Moon government may see this decision as domestically popular and as a symbolic, low-cost way of signaling resolve to Tokyo. However, this move will raise international concerns that Seoul misreads the regional security situation and is presently unwilling to shoulder its responsibility for improving Korea-Japan relations."

The relationship between the two countries has been deteriorating since even before a South Korean court ruled that Japanese companies must pay reparations to Koreans forced to work in Japan during WWII, which Japan has claimed goes against a treaty signed in 1965, that supposedly settled the issue of war reparations.

By Zerohedge.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment