• 2 hours How Big A Threat Is Climate Change To The Global Economy?
  • 1 day $120,000 Banana Gets Eaten At Art Basel
  • 2 days The Fastest Growing Energy Sectors Of 2019
  • 3 days How To Spy On Yourself: The Doorbell To End Civil Liberties
  • 4 days Analyst Predicts Tesla Stock Will Soar To $500
  • 5 days Australian Billionaire To Invest In $88 Million Struggling Solar Project
  • 6 days Twitter-Shaming: The Biggest Threat To Any Business
  • 6 days Canada Looks To Become A Major Source For Critical Minerals
  • 6 days Hedge Funds Are Piling Into This Key Commodity
  • 8 days Trade Deal Not Likely Before Christmas 2020
  • 8 days America's $16 Trillion Debt Bubble Is About To Burst
  • 9 days Black Friday Breaks Online Shopping Records
  • 9 days Tesla's Biggest Competitor Is Hiding In Plain Sight
  • 10 days Are Celebrities Good Or Bad For Cannabis Stocks?
  • 11 days Venezuela’s Crisis Continues As Maduro Spends $5 Billion On Oil Deals
  • 12 days Elon Musk Claims 250,000 Orders For Cybertruck
  • 13 days How To Survive Thanksgiving Politics With Cannabis Gravy
  • 14 days The Fragility Of Monetary Policy
  • 15 days 5 Oligopoly Stock Picks For Your 2020 Portfolio
  • 15 days $7 Trillion In Unfunded U.S. Pensions As Domestic Debt Hits A Record High
Analyst Predicts Tesla Stock Will Soar To $500

Analyst Predicts Tesla Stock Will Soar To $500

Tesla’s share price could soar…

How To Spy On Yourself: The Doorbell To End Civil Liberties

How To Spy On Yourself: The Doorbell To End Civil Liberties

The billion-dollar ‘smart’ doorbell company…

$120,000 Banana Gets Eaten At Art Basel

$120,000 Banana Gets Eaten At Art Basel

The banana escapade attracted a…

Oilprice.com

Oilprice.com

Writer, OilPrice.com

Information/Articles and Prices on a wide range of commodities: We have assembled a team of experienced writers to provide you with information on Crude Oil,…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Breaking News

Washington's $400 Billion Emissions Plan

Trump

A controversial proposal by the Trump administration to freeze greenhouse gas emissions standards at 2020 levels for all cars made between 2021 and 2026 could end up costing the economy US$400 billion through 2050 plus an increase in actual emissions, an energy policy firm has warned.

Using open-source predictive modeling software, the Energy Policy Simulator, Energy Innovation found that although at first the freeze on emissions standards will lead to household savings since less fuel-efficient cars are cheaper, it would ultimately increase costs as less fuel-efficient cars also use more fuel. BY 2050, these are estimated at the hefty US$400 billion in 2018 dollars.

Of course, it won’t be just higher costs that will be the problem but also higher emissions with a freeze on standards. According to Energy Innovation, these will increase most in the 2030s, as after that, the company assumes EV sales will increase considerably, reducing the market share of cars with internal combustion engines, fuel-efficient or not.

This future is dire but, in all fairness, it is highly uncertain it will pan out. For starters, carmakers themselves are not on board with the administration’s proposal. Four major companies—Ford, Volkswagen, Honda, and BMW—struck a deal with California regarding stricter fuel efficiency requirements last month, and they did it in secret as Washington is seeking to strip the nation’s biggest car market of the right to set its own rules.

Others might follow suit, not just with California but with raising their fuel efficiency standards amid changing public perceptions of what is acceptable in emissions and what isn’t. That’s despite an effort by the administration to motivate laxer fuel efficiency rules by suspending an Obama-era rule regarding penalties for excess fuel consumption.

Under the original rule, the companies making cars consuming more fuel than allowed under the emissions standards, would have to pay up to US$14 for every 0.1 mile per gallon of excessive fuel consumption. That, the industry calculated at the time, would cost it US$1 billion annually. Now, Trump plans to do away with those penalties and keep them at the current, much more modest level of US$5.50 for 0.1 mile per gallon.

It was no surprise carmakers rejoiced at the news, first released last month. A billion dollars saved is a billion dollars earned. However, they may nevertheless continue working to make their cars more efficient. That’s because attitudes are changing.

A survey from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication found that the number of Americans who are worried about climate change had risen. As much as 72 percent believe climate change is important to them, which is up from 42 percent five six years ago. Now, this may or may not affect actual car-buying decisions, but if the trend continues, this change of attitude would at some point begin to affect these decisions, and carmakers are no doubt aware of that.

So, the administration’s drive to relax emissions rules may paint a bleak picture of the future, but there is no certainty at all that this bleak picture will materialize, not least because Trump has another term in office at most, and whoever comes after him, next year or in 2024, will more likely than not have a different attitude to climate change.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment