Not Made in America

By: Richard Mills | Fri, Sep 16, 2011
Print Email

As a general rule the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information

Government attempts to inflate the money supply and stimulate growth through quantitative easing have failed, so far, because they gave the stimulus to banks, not directly to their citizens - stimulation will only work if the cash is spent:

There seems to have been a lesson recently learned. Instead of spending every penny they have and borrowing more - gleefully maxing out their credit limits - Americans are turning into savers. The savings rate, a short while ago in negative territory, has turned upwards and today is five percent.

Recent research shows:

"The economic impact of further US consumer deleveraging will depend on income growth - with no income growth, each percentage point increase in the savings rate reduces spending by over $100 billion. US consumers have accounted for more than three-quarters of US GDP growth since 2000 and for more than one-third of global growth in private consumption since 1990." ~ McKinsey Global Institute

Consumers will not borrow and spend when they're unemployed, underemployed or fear for their jobs. When consumers have no money to spend demand is reduced, this starts a vicious loop, prices are reduced when there are no buyers, which reduces profit margins, which results in layoffs, which results in even greater unemployment, underemployment and fear of job loss.

What's holding the US economy back from recovery is not a lack of consumer and business confidence, a poor housing market or suppressed demand, although all exist. They exist because they are all symptoms caused by the root problem of the US economy - a lack of good jobs. High quality American jobs were shipped off-shore by the millions and continue to be off-shored today.

US corporations need overseas operations to service their foreign markets, that's a given and there's nothing wrong with it. However many US companies shuttered their plants in America, rebuilt those plants overseas, and used foreign labor to manufacture the very same products Americans use to make.

As an aside - these same US corporations are now screaming for a second "tax holiday" in which they can repatriate their enormously increased profits back to America at roughly six percent instead of the usual 35% US corporate tax rate. All the while increasing their overseas investments and off-shoring more American jobs.

The communities that lose these off-shored high paying jobs never recover, the people who lost those jobs were never retrained and if they were for what? Likely to face increasingly stiffer and stiffer competition for a much lower paying job - with no benefits such as health coverage or ensured retirement security - in the service industry.

JOLTS stands for Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. July's JOLTS show there were 4.32 officially unemployed people looking for work for every job available. Use the real, unofficial unemployed statistics, and its 7.7 people looking for work for every job available - there's no shortage of people willing to work - there's a jobs shortage.

People need to work, they need a job to support themselves, feed, shelter and cloth their families. And yes, have some cash left over from their pay cheque for discretionary spending. The off-shoring of millions of jobs from America took away millions of opportunities for Americans to better themselves and instead gave American opportunity to foreigners. In return, America was forced to create a service industry based economy, one where people need two jobs, and still barely have enough to cover the basics of survival let alone money for discretionary spending.

Central Bank and government intervention/stimulation doesn't work - only robust job creation can right the floundering western economies.

Manufacturing jobs traditionally have provided high wages and good benefits that allow workers to care for their families. Yet big business, the multinationals responsible for off-shoring, are addicted to non-unionized and benefit free cheap overseas labor.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, required that funds provided by the bill could not be used to purchase foreign made iron, steel, and textiles. The Senate provision was tougher still - it mandated that all manufactured goods purchased with ARRA money had to be American made - Buy American. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Emergency Committee for American Trade in Washington, General Electric, Caterpillar and many other US transnational corporations opposed the "Buy American" part of the Act.

The American middle class is being destroyed because of off-shoring American jobs. The US middle class drives the US economy and the US economy is by far the largest driver of the global economy so the consequences of the destruction of the US middle class is international in effect.

"An important part of the job fraud is to make the people feel like the loss of jobs is due to the recession, not off-shoring. Long before the recession, South Carolina lost its textile industry; North Carolina lost its furniture industry; Detroit its automobile industry, and California its computer industry, etc. President Obama wants to increase exports, but we have nothing to export. Today, the United States has the export profile of an eighteenth century colony... Last week, the Wall Street Journal announced that the largest chemical producer in the United States was off-shoring. Most of the job loss is from off-shoring, not the recession. But Washington acts as if nothing can be done to limit the off-shoring and protect our economy.

Globalization has developed into a trade war with production looking for the cheapest country to produce, with fierce competition for industry and jobs." ~ Washington's Job Fraud by Sen. Fritz Hollings

Twelve million jobs are needed just to get back to even yet:

Recently President Barack Obama started an Advisory Council for Jobs and Competitiveness. When announcing the Jobs Council Obama said:

"Our job is to do everything we can to ensure that businesses can take root, and folks can find good jobs. We're going to build stuff, and invent stuff."

Jeff Immelt, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at GE, is the head of President Obama's 26 member Council on Jobs and Competitiveness - the sole purpose of which is creating jobs in the USA.

General Electric:

"In a regulatory filing just a week before the Japanese disaster put a spotlight on the company's nuclear reactor business, G.E. reported that its tax burden was 7.4 percent of its American profits, about a third of the average reported by other American multinationals. Even those figures are overstated, because they include taxes that will be paid only if the company brings its overseas profits back to the United States. With those profits still offshore, G.E. is effectively getting money back.

Such strategies, as well as changes in tax laws that encouraged some businesses and professionals to file as individuals, have pushed down the corporate share of the nation's tax receipts -- from 30 percent of all federal revenue in the mid-1950s to 6.6 percent in 2009." G.E.'s Strategies Let It Avoid Taxes Altogether By David Kocieniewski

Then there's this by Congressman Kucinich:

"As 14 million Americans struggle with unemployment, General Electric, under Mr. Immelt's leadership, is exporting highly-sophisticated technology to the Chinese in order to book short-term profits for GE. GE strives mightily to avoid paying federal income taxes, but goes 'all in' on a deal to transfer U.S. government-subsidized technology to the Chinese. Jeffrey Immelt has a conflict of interest. He cannot ethically advise the President on how to create American jobs and promote American competiveness, while at the same time leading a company that is exporting American technology and, along with it, American jobs." Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)

Members of Obama's Jobs Council, from other U.S. multinational corporations, include:

America's economy use to be a job creation engine but in the last decade (2000-2010) job creation actually went into reverse - the effects have been horrendous.

The official unemployment rate, at 9.1 per cent, remains more than twice as high as it was in 2007. The real jobless rate is considerably higher - include those who have become so discouraged that they didn't look for a job last month (2.6 million), and those working part-time hours because they cannot find full-time work (8.8 million), and the combined unemployment and underemployment rate would be approaching 20%.

Latest data, Census Bureau Report, released September 12th:

One of the biggest proponents of off-shoring - the McKinsey Global Institute - found, in their 2003 report, Off-shoring: Is It A Win-Win Game?, that while the American economy gained from off-shoring, American workers didn't.

The report estimated that with no off-shoring American workers received 72 cents for each dollar of economic activity, while after off-shoring began American workers received only 45 cents.

"Can we trust the resilience of our economy? The starting point is convincing people of the probability of re-employment. … Over the past 10 years, the US economy has created a total of 35 million new private sector jobs, or an average of 3.5 million new jobs per year. At this rate of job creation, the vast majority of displaced workers are re-employed within 6 months." ~ Diana Farrell, lead author of the McKinsey report

Even in 2003 the US economy wasn't creating enough jobs for all the US workers displaced by off-shoring. Today's job creation is a different situation than in 2003 - it's far worse. The American economy is not creating jobs - no jobs were created in August 2011 - let alone 3.5 million a year.

"Jobs off-shoring is nothing more than an activity in pursuit of the lowest cost factor." ~ Paul Craig Roberts

David Ricardo, the originator of the free trade theory, described jobs off-shoring as the betrayal of one's own country in pursuit of "absolute advantage."

American jobs sent out of the country aren't likely to return anytime soon and as long as employers can continue to take advantage of much lower production costs in other countries, and the breaks they receive from America for exporting them there, why would they bring them back?


"NOT MADE IN AMERICA" stickers are now found on nearly every item for sale in America. In 1985, the US imported less than $4 billion worth of goods from China, and the country had just a small trade deficit. Today, the US spends almost $400 billion per year just on Chinese goods and has a massive trade deficit with the world.

Real new wealth, and an economic superpower, are only created when a countries resources are used to manufacture goods to sell at home and abroad, and when a countries natural resources are used to provide solid long term high paying jobs. When people are working, and have discretionary income, economic stimulus results. The United States of America was an economic superpower for these very reasons. The US needs to regenerate and re-grow its economy - restart the process of generating new wealth - this creates jobs and brings national prosperity.

Exploitation of the United States own natural resources, combined with a solid manufacturing sector and the right infrastructure spending stimulus will, in this author's opinion, be the economic drivers of a resurgent US economy.

Are companies engaged in the search for, development and extraction of natural resources on your radar screen?

If not, maybe they should be.



Richard Mills

Author: Richard Mills

Richard (Rick) Mills

Richard Mills

Richard lives with his family on a 160 acre ranch in northern British Columbia. He invests in the resource and biotechnology/pharmaceutical sectors and is the owner of His articles have been published on over 400 websites, including:, WallStreetJournal, USAToday, NationalPost, Lewrockwell, MontrealGazette, VancouverSun, CBSnews, HuffingtonPost, Beforeitsnews, Londonthenews, Wealthwire, CalgaryHerald, Forbes, Dallasnews, SGTreport, Vantagewire, Indiatimes, Ninemsn, Ibtimes, Businessweek, HongKongHerald, Moneytalks, SeekingAlpha, BusinessInsider, and the Association of Mining Analysts.

Please visit

Moderated investor friendly forums - Ahead of the Herd is powered by Community Intelligence.

Free highly acclaimed newsletter featuring today's investable junior resource companies.

If you are interested in sponsoring Richard's site please contact him for more information,

Legal Notice / Disclaimer: This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. Richard Mills has based this document on information obtained from sources he believes to be reliable but which has not been independently verified; Richard Mills makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Richard Mills only and are subject to change without notice. Richard Mills assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Furthermore, I, Richard Mills, assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information provided within this Report.

Ahead of the Media Group Inc.a division of Ahead of the Herd Holdings Inc. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Ahead of the does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Ahead of the may actively trade in the investments discussed in this website and newsletter. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this website and publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Copyright © 2009-2017 Richard Mills

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright ©