• 511 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 511 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 513 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 913 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 918 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 920 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 923 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 923 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 924 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 926 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 926 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 930 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 930 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 931 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 933 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 934 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 937 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 938 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 938 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 940 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

What Do the Numbers Say?

It is rare for me to make a statement regarding the markets unless I have some data to back me up. In the weekly sentiment wrap up, I stated: "since 1991 covering 40 unique instances, the SP500 bottomed 80% of the time with a reasonable risk (<6% draw down) to capital after two consecutive weeks of extreme bearish sentiment; and 2) failure of the market to bottom is a very ominous sign." So let's drill down a little deeper and see what the numbers say and why I would make such a statement.

Figure 1 is a weekly chart of the SP500 (symbol: $INX) with the "dumb money" indicator in the lower panel. So here is the study: 1) buy the SP500 when the "dumb money" is bearish for two consecutive weeks; 2) we sell our position when the "dumb money" indicator turns neutral. In other words, we are only in the market when the "dumb money" is green in color, which means investors are too bearish. The data goes back to 1991, and all positions are executed at the close of the week.

Figure 1. SP500/ weekly
SP500 Weekly

Since 1990, there have been 40 unique occurrences or trades yielding 858 SP500 points. Buy and hold only generated 950 SP500 points over the same time period. The strategy was only in the market 20% of the time, so in essence, the strategy yielded an almost market beating return with only 1/5th the market exposure. That is pretty strong. 80% of the trades were profitable. The average trade lasted 5.5 weeks. So far, the results are fairly compelling, but to get an even better picture of why I would make those statements, let's look at every trade from this strategy. To do this we need to look at the maximum adverse excursion (MAE) graph. See figure 2.

Figure 2. MAE graph
MAE Graph

The MAE graph looks at every trade from a strategy and determines how much a trade had to lose before being closed out as a winner or a loser. If you are like me, you put on a trade and watch as it goes adverse to its entry price. MAE is the angst factor. At some point, the position is closed out for a win or a lost. For example, look at the trade inside the blue box. This trade initially lost 5.35% (x axis) before being closed out for a 1.77% (y axis) winner. We know this was a winning trade because it is a green caret.

Out of the 40 trades, 33 had MAE's less than 6%; this is to the left of the orange vertical line. In addition, 31 of those 33 trades were profitable. So if you buy the SP500 when the "dumb money" indicator is bearish for two consecutive weeks, then you have an 80% chance your MAE or trade draw down will be less than 6%. To the right of the orange vertical line shows all the failed or bad signals. With 5 out of the 7, the MAE was greater than 10%, and 6 out of 7 were losing trades. That's why I can state that bad signals are ominous.

In sum, I still believe the data supports betting with the market when the "dumb money" indicator turns bearish. It doesn't work every time, but show something that does.

 


If you would like to have TheTechnicalTake delivered to your email in box, please click here: It's free!!!

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment