• 1 hour TikTok Takes Center Stage In US-China Tech War
  • 9 hours Are Semiconductor Stocks Overvalued?
  • 1 day Jobs Report Doesn’t Say Much Amid COVID Uncertainty
  • 1 day Crypto FOMO Heats Up As Bitcoin Climbs Above $11,000
  • 2 days Aluminum Is Bouncing Back In China
  • 2 days The Deep-Sea Mining Debate
  • 3 days Markets Trending Down Despite Tech Blow-Out
  • 3 days Big Oil Battered On Dismal Earnings
  • 4 days Russian Billionaire Bails On Mid-Sized Gold Miner
  • 4 days Gold Stocks Gear Up For A Big Autumn
  • 5 days America Is Looking To Bring Nuclear Power To Space
  • 5 days What Is Behind Gold's Astonishing Rally?
  • 6 days Stocks Tumble On Brutal Economic Report
  • 6 days Kodak Soars By 400% After Trump Bump
  • 7 days U.S. Coal Production Falls To 42 Year Lows
  • 7 days Indonesia Moves To Bolster Mining Sector
  • 8 days The U.S. Dollar Is Losing Ground As A Reserve Currency
  • 8 days Gold Prices Soar To Record Highs As Dollar Dips
  • 9 days Republicans Unveil Stimulus 2.0
  • 9 days Big Oil Is Back On The M&A Game
Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The NDAA Repeals More Rights

Little by little, in the name of fighting terrorism, our Bill of Rights is being repealed. The 4th amendment has been rendered toothless by the PATRIOT Act. No more can we truly feel secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects when now there is an exception that fits nearly any excuse for our government to search and seize our property. Of course, the vast majority of Americans may say "I'm not a terrorist, so I have no reason to worry." However, innocent people are wrongly accused all the time. The Bill of Rights is there precisely because the founders wanted to set a very high bar for the government to overcome in order to deprive an individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to include political enemies, our descent into totalitarianism is virtually assured.

The PATRIOT Act, as bad is its violation of the 4th Amendment, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) continues that slip toward tyranny and in fact accelerates it significantly. The main section of concern, Section 1021 of the NDAA Conference Report, does to the 5th Amendment what the PATRIOT Act does to the 4th. The 5th Amendment is about much more than the right to remain silent in the face of government questioning. It contains very basic and very critical stipulations about due process of law. The government cannot imprison a person for no reason and with no evidence presented or access to legal counsel.

The dangers in the NDAA are its alarmingly vague, undefined criteria for who can be indefinitely detained by the US government without trial. It is now no longer limited to members of al Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone accused of "substantially supporting" such groups or "associated forces." How closely associated? And what constitutes "substantial" support? What if it was discovered that someone who committed a terrorist act was once involved with a charity? Or supported a political candidate? Are all donors of that charity or supporters of that candidate now suspect, and subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now an associated force?

Additionally, this legislation codifies in law for the first time authority to detain Americans that has to this point only been claimed by President Obama. According to subsection (e) of section 1021, "[n]othing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States." This means the president's widely expanded view of his own authority to detain Americans indefinitely even on American soil is for the first time in this legislation codified in law. That should chill all of us to our cores.

The Bill of Rights has no exemptions for "really bad people" or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a key check on government power against any person. That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is the very strength of our legal system. The NDAA attempts to justify abridging the bill of rights on the theory that rights are suspended in a time of war, and the entire Unites States is a battlefield in the War on Terror. This is a very dangerous development indeed. Beware.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment