• 306 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 306 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 308 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 708 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 712 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 714 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 717 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 718 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 719 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 720 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 721 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 725 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 725 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 726 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 728 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 728 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 732 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 732 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 733 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 735 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

US Treasury Bonds, Gold and Stock Market

The following is one of a wide range of analytical topics covered in NFTRH 293s 35 pages this week, much of which is straight ahead technical analysis. But the T Bond market is usually central to an overall macro view at any given time. This segment is not meant to provide actionable direction (other than perhaps to prepare for a potential rise in T bonds yields), it is meant to dig into the mechanics beneath the financial markets in an effort to have people consider that there is much more going on with markets than simple nominal TA or conventional fundamental analysis (PE ratios, growth metrics, reported economic data, etc.) can account for.


US Treasury Bonds


Larger Image

10 & 30yr yields have declined to support as NFTRH projected

Yields on long-term Treasuries have continued to decline in line with our view that was contrary the 'Great Rotation' (out of bonds) hype. The [30-year] especially is now close to support and the next play seems like it could be rising yields and declining T bonds.


Larger Image

Our long-term 'Continuum' chart; yields approach support

The 30-year 'Continuum' view above makes the simple case that players had to be put offside believing in the 'Great Rotation' at 4% yields. The nearly half-year decline since then has now satisfied the chart as yields have come to our 3.1% to 3.2% target range, where there is support.

It is interesting that stocks have continued to rise despite declining yields, whereas previously they had been rising with yields. One victim of this phenomenon however, has been a stock market leader, the banks. It is no surprise at all that bank leadership broke down as yields broke down because ZIRP provides in essence free money where they borrow (Fed Funds) and higher long-term yields provides the implied profit incentive, where they package this stuff out to public and commercial borrowers.

Moving on, we'll close with the 10yr vs. 2yr yield curve with gold juxtaposed in the background.


Larger Image

It continues to be in the realm of possibility if not probability that the gold community's trials and tribulations of the last 2.5 years has been fully earned as the most vocal boosters of the metal looked like utter geniuses in 2004 through 2007 when gold went up while the curve went down and we might add, gold went nowhere vs. commodities (ref. Gold-CCI on page 21).

That was a time when the fundamentals for gold and the gold stock sector were 'not good' and 'flat out awful', respectively. That is because it was a time of economic expansion, not deceleration.

So tell me now Bueller, does the ongoing 2.5 year precious metals bloodbath make sense given that the economy is working relatively as current policy wants it to? Yes, it does make sense.

There is hype in the financial media about how a flattening curve is bad for stocks and the economy, but this chart puts a lie to that lazy analysis. The analysis claims that the curve is still elevated (nice understatement) and thus there is little to worry about.

A flat yield curve worked well enough in the secular bull into 2000, when the situation began to change and a rising curve attended the bear market out of the tech bubble. A flattening curve also attended the 2003 to 2007 cyclical bull market. In the post-2000 age of 'Inflation on Demand' a sharply rising curve has gone hand in hand with unprecedented upset in global financial markets. Most recently however, the curve has dropped in accordance with economic recovery (ref: Operation Twist, which helped kick things off as it pressured short-term yields upward while pressuring long-term yields downward).

Again, much like with the Gold-CCI chart on page 21, if this big picture view breaks down so too must the analysis change to allow for its implications, which would be that a new era of prosperity has been created out of monetary policy. The thing is though, they have not broken down yet so instead, NFTRH stays the course and marvels at these charts showing just how desperate policy has been in its effort to keep the picture intact.

DJIA vs 3-Month Treasury Bill: Secondary Market Rate Comparison

Dow & T Bill rate, long-term relationship


Larger Image

Closer view of the 3 month T Bill rate pinned to ZERO, 5 years & counting

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment