"No warning can save people determined to grow suddently rich" - Lord Overstone

  • 2 mins Stock Markets Open Lower On Renewed Trade War Fears
  • 16 hours Should Investors Start Lining Up For North Korea?
  • 2 days Crypto Heists Are On The Rise
  • 3 days Got Money To Launder? Try Dubai Real Estate
  • 3 days Swiss Commodity Trader Takes 50% Profit Hit
  • 3 days The Tech Fueling The Fourth Industrial Revolution
  • 3 days Bitcoin Struggles Following Manipulation Claims
  • 3 days Almost Half Of San Francisco Residents Want Out
  • 3 days Will Cryptos Hold Up In A Major Financial Crisis?
  • 4 days Why Gold Isn’t Working As Stock Hedge
  • 4 days Samsung Commits To 100% Renewable Energy
  • 4 days London Lashes Out At The CEO Pay Gap
  • 4 days Banks Spent $1.7B On Blockchain Last Year
  • 4 days Solar Boom Unfazed By New Tariffs
  • 4 days Nasdaq Pulls Back After Hitting A Record High
  • 4 days Where Is Gold Heading After Fed Rate Hike?
  • 5 days Will Russia Profit From The World Cup?
  • 5 days London Stock Exchange To List First Blockchain Company
  • 5 days Millennials Are Leaving Prestigious Banking Jobs To Trade Crypto
  • 5 days Goldman: Netflix Is Set To Soar
Equities On Track To Post Best May In A Decade

Equities On Track To Post Best May In A Decade

Stock markets typically perform poorly…

FANG Stocks May Be Due For A Correction

FANG Stocks May Be Due For A Correction

With the Nasdaq hitting an…

Fiat-Chrysler Bursts Onto The Electric Car Scene

Fiat-Chrysler Bursts Onto The Electric Car Scene

Fiat-Chrysler, despite its strong stance…

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in…

More Info

Ferguson: The War Comes Home

America's attention recently turned away from the violence in Iraq and Gaza toward the violence in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting of Michael Brown. While all the facts surrounding the shooing have yet to come to light, the shock of seeing police using tear gas (a substance banned in warfare), and other military-style weapons against American citizens including journalists exercising their First Amendment rights, has started a much-needed debate on police militarization.

The increasing use of military equipment by local police is a symptom of growing authoritarianism, not the cause. The cause is policies that encourage police to see Americans as enemies to subjugate, rather than as citizens to "protect and serve." This attitude is on display not only in Ferguson, but in the police lockdown following the Boston Marathon bombing and in the Americans killed and injured in "no-knock" raids conducted by militarized SWAT teams.

One particularly tragic victim of police militarization and the war on drugs is "baby Bounkham." This infant was severely burned and put in a coma by a flash-burn grenade thrown into his crib by a SWAT team member who burst into the infant's room looking for methamphetamine.

As shocking as the case of baby Bounkham is, no one should be surprised that empowering police to stop consensual (though perhaps harmful and immoral) activities has led to a growth of authoritarian attitudes and behaviors among government officials and politicians. Those wondering why the local police increasingly look and act like an occupying military force should consider that the drug war was the justification for the Defense Department's "1033 program," which last year gave local police departments almost $450 million worth of "surplus" military equipment. This included armored vehicles and grenades like those that were used to maim baby Bounkham.

Today, the war on drugs has been eclipsed by the war on terror as an all-purpose excuse for expanding the police state. We are all familiar with how the federal government increased police power after September 11 via the PATRIOT Act, TSA, and other Homeland Security programs. Not as widely known is how the war on terror has been used to justify the increased militarization of local police departments to the detriment of our liberty. Since 2002, the Department of Homeland Security has provided over $35 billion in grants to local governments for the purchase of tactical gear, military-style armor, and mine-resistant vehicles.

The threat of terrorism is used to justify these grants. However, the small towns that receive tanks and other military weapons do not just put them into storage until a real terrorist threat emerges. Instead, the military equipment is used for routine law enforcement.

Politicians love this program because it allows them to brag to their local media about how they are keeping their constituents safe. Of course, the military-industrial complex's new kid brother, the law enforcement-industrial complex, wields tremendous influence on Capitol Hill. Even many so-called progressives support police militarization to curry favor with police unions.

Reversing the dangerous trend of the militarization of local police can start with ending all federal involvement in local law enforcement. Fortunately, all that requires is for Congress to begin following the Constitution, which forbids the federal government from controlling or funding local law enforcement. There is also no justification for federal drug laws or for using the threat of terrorism as an excuse to treat all people as potential criminals. However, Congress will not restore constitutional government on its own; the American people must demand that Congress stop facilitating the growth of an authoritarian police state that threatens their liberty.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment