• 268 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 273 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 275 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 278 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 278 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 279 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 281 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 281 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 285 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 285 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 286 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 288 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 289 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 292 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 293 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 293 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 295 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 296 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 299 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 300 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Reviving The American Dream

Reviving The American Dream

With Charles Hugh Smith & Gordon T Long

31 Minutes - 18 Slides

Charles Hugh Smith and Gordon T Long follow-up to their discussion last month of the puzzle of the falling US Civilian Labor Participation Rate. In this session they tackle the issues associated with "Universal Basic Income" which the public narrative has begun to 'offer up' as a solution.


Public Narrative

"A Solution to Automation -- Universal Basic Income for all"

The conventional wisdom is that a guaranteed free-money check from the central state is the solution. This is nothing more that "A Redistribution Scheme: A new form of Subsistence Serfdom"

• It doesn't address how this enormously costly program will be paid.

• It is Understood that the "Wealthy" will pay for it!

• Runs aground on the reality that upper-middle class and top 5% already pay 93% of all federal income taxes; they actually can't afford more taxes.

• The top .01% who can afford to pay will continue to buy political protection of their income, and that's not going to change:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/30/business/economy/for-the-wealthiest-private-tax-system-saves-them-billions.html


Declining Labor Participation Rate - The Status Quo has no solution!

Declining work force will be unable to pay for the "pay as you go" social programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Declining labor force will also be unable to support more borrowing -- and the system requires more borrowing just to keep afloat.

Decline of labor is the inevitable result of automation, which has only started eroding white-collar and managerial jobs.

The Reality: New technology creates far fewer jobs than it replaces/destroys

http://www.fastcoexist.com/3054604/todays-tech-giants-are-creating-loads-of-wealth-but-pitifully-few-jobs

The Reality: Today's Tech Giants Are Creating Loads Of Wealth But Pitifully Few Jobs

Why Basic Income is not realistic or positive: http://www.oftwominds.com/blogdec15/basic-income12-15.html

-- Financially unsustainable,

-- A disaster for those getting the welfare check. They are essentially serfs, with no incentives or pathways to build capital.

For the Wealthiest - A Private Tax System That Saves Them Billions

-- ultimately, proponents of basic guaranteed income are relying on borrowing additional trillions of dollars to pay for the scheme. Not only is this financially unsustainable, it is immoral to load debt on future generations to pay for today's spending.

Why Firms Are Fleeing

-- as for expecting corporations to tax trillions more in higher taxes -- they're fleeing US taxes, and they are also buying political favors to avoid higher taxes. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/01/11/why-firms-are-fleeing

Creating Jobs for All


Understanding The Differences

1- The failed model of WELFARE-FOR-ALL - Communal Poverty

• The central-state welfare model

• Top-down, encouraging dependency and helplessness -- and resentment

2- The Social-Economic model of SHARED BENEFITS flowing from working productively together

• The community economy

• Bottom-up, encouraging accumulation of capital, skills, etc.

• Creating the goods and services that are scarce and needed within local communities requires new ways of thinking and organizing work


Subsistance Serfdom

• Giving people money without getting any productive work is destructive to participants,

• Those who have to pay for the free-riders (the community) loses the labor of its residents.

• Our goal should be to provide meaningful work to people in their own communities, not give them subsistence welfare,

• Guaranteed income for all is just a new form of subsistence serfdom.

• Those looking to central state "solutions" such as basic guaranteed income are out of touch with the reality that real solutions come from below, in the entrepreneurial Main Street economy, not from above (central banks, politicians enacting new social programs, etc.)

... and much, much more in this 31 minute frank and open discussion..

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment