• 13 hours Americans Don’t Care if TikTok Is A Security Threat
  • 2 days What’s Next In The Trump vs. Twitter Drama?
  • 3 days Escalating Tensions Could Crush $52 Billion China-U.S. Energy Deal
  • 4 days The Fed Is Printing Money At Unprecedented Levels
  • 4 days How Is The Real Estate Market Handling COVID-19?
  • 4 days Gold Flat As Markets Await Fed Chair Speech
  • 4 days What Is Day Trading And Is It Right For You?
  • 4 days Energy CEOs See Big Payouts Despite Oil Price Crash
  • 4 days Saudi Arabia Is Fighting A War On Two Fronts
  • 4 days 40 Million Jobless As Pandemic Fuels Economic Collapse
  • 4 days What Do India's Latest Reforms Mean For Its Coal Industry?
  • 4 days Copper Glut Continues To Grow
  • 5 days How A Pandemic Made Americans Better Workers
  • 5 days The Trillion Dollar Space Race Crosses Another Milestone
  • 5 days Gold Prices Fall As Stock Market Sentiment Turns Positive
  • 5 days Conspiracy Theories Set Tone For 5G Cold War
  • 6 days Working From Home Will Transform The Energy Industry
  • 6 days The Multi-Billion Dollar Race For A Vaccine
  • 6 days Can Domestic Tourism Bolster Emerging Economies?
  • 6 days Australia Considers $100 Million Investment To Kickstart Mining Industry
Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

During the quarter there were…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Trump's ISIS Plan: Another US Invasion?

Just over a week into the Trump Administration, the President issued an Executive Order giving Defense Secretary James Mattis 30 days to come up with a plan to defeat ISIS. According to the Order, the plan should make recommendations on military actions, diplomatic actions, partners, strategies, and how to pay for the operation.

As we approach the president's deadline it looks like the military is going to present Trump with a plan to do a whole lot more of what we've been doing and somehow expect different results. Proving the old saying that when all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail, we are hearing increasing reports that the military will recommend sending thousands of US troops into Syria and Iraq.

This would be a significant escalation in both countries, as currently there are about 5,000 US troops still fighting our 13-year war in Iraq, and some 500 special forces soldiers operating in Syria.

The current Syria ceasefire, brokered without US involvement at the end of 2016, is producing positive results and the opposing groups are talking with each other under Russian and Iranian sponsorship. Does anyone think sending thousands of US troops into a situation that is already being resolved without us is a good idea?

In language reminiscent of his plans to build a wall on the Mexican border, the president told a political rally in Florida over the weekend that he was going to set up "safe zones" in Syria and would make the Gulf States pay for them. There are several problems with this plan.

First, any "safe zone" set up inside Syria, especially if protected by US troops, would amount to a massive US invasion of the country unless the Assad government approves them. Does President Trump want to begin his presidency with an illegal invasion of a sovereign country?

Second, there is the little problem of the Russians, who are partners with the Assad government in its efforts to rid the country of ISIS and al-Qaeda. ISIS is already losing territory on a daily basis. Is President Trump willing to risk a military escalation with Russia to protect armed regime-change forces in Syria?

Third, the Gulf States are the major backers of al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria - as the president's own recently-resigned National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, revealed in a 2015 interview. Unless these safe zones are being set up to keep al-Qaeda and ISIS safe, it doesn't make any sense to involve the Gulf States.

Many will say we should not be surprised at these latest moves. As a candidate, Trump vowed to defeat ISIS once and for all. However, does anyone really believe that continuing the same strategy we have followed for the past 16 years will produce different results this time? If what you are hammering is not a nail, will hammering it harder get it nailed in?

Washington cannot handle the truth: solving the ISIS problem must involve a whole lot less US activity in the Middle East, not a whole lot more. Until that is understood, we will continue to waste trillions of dollars and untold lives in a losing endeavor.

 


Buy Ron Paul's latest book, Swords into Plowshares, here.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment