• 657 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 657 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 659 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,059 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,063 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,065 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,069 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,069 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,070 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,071 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,072 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,076 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,076 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,077 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,079 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,079 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,083 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,084 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,084 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,086 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Past Year's Stock Market Rally Has Not Been Economically Driven

What accounts for the 18.4% increase in the S&P 500 stock price index in the 12 months ended June 2007? Was it profit growth? Hardly. The Commerce Department's National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) measure of corporate profits adjusted for prices (the GDP chain price index) shows the year-over-year change at minus 0.8% as of Q1:2007, the latest data available (see Chart 1). In nominal terms, year-over-year NIPA profit growth was only 2.1% in Q1:2007 vs. 10.1% in Q1:2006 (see Chart 2).

Chart 1

Chart 2

Real GDP growth has slowed significantly. On a year-over-year basis, real GDP was up only 1.8% in Q2:2007 vs. 3.2% in Q2:2006 (see Chart 3).

Chart 3

So, what has been driving U.S. stock prices higher? Massive buybacks of their own stocks by corporations and massive amounts of corporate stocks being purchased by private equity syndicates in taking publicly-traded companies private. And what has been driving this massive "de-equitization"? Cheap credit. Chart 4 shows that non-financial corporate borrowing has picked up in absolute terms and in relative terms - relative to capital spending.

Chart 4

But now, credit to fund de-equitization is getting more expensive. Since June 12, the yield spread between high yield (aka junk) bonds and 10-year U.S. Treasury securities has increased by 150 basis points (see Chart 5). Even with this recent widening, corporate credit-risk spreads still are relatively low (see Chart 6). But should they continue to widen, this de-equitization factor that has been driving up stock prices will wane.

Chart 5

Chart 6

Would a significant slowdown in de-equitization have a negative impact on U.S. aggregate demand? You bet it would. As I argued in my latest The Econtrarian (Wealth Effect or Borrowing/Asset Sales Effect?), households have been net sellers of corporate equities (to corporations and private equity entities), the proceeds of which have been helping to fund household deficits. With the mortgage credit market tightening, a significant slowing in de-equitization would be another nail in the coffin of household spending, which accounts for 75% of real GDP. Perhaps the feeble 0.6% quarter-to-quarter annualized growth in real household expenditures (sum of real personal consumption and residential investment expenditures) in Q2:2007 - the weakest since Q1:1995 - is the new reality (see Chart 7).

Chart 7

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment