• 3 hours Trump Wants Another $2 Trillion Economic Intervention
  • 21 hours The Surprising Businesses Deemed “Essential” During The Coronavirus Lockdown
  • 1 day Priceless Van Gogh "Spring Garden" Painting Stolen
  • 1 day Oil Falls To $20 For First Time In Nearly Two Decades
  • 1 day COVID-19 Could Be The End Of U.S. Coal
  • 2 days How Much Does Your Social Security Number Cost? $4 On The Dark Web
  • 3 days Silver Stocks Have Been Decimated In The Coronavirus Sell-Off
  • 4 days How Blockchain Tech Could Make Mergers And Acquisitions More Efficient
  • 4 days America’s Shortage Of This Metal Keeps Trump Up At Night
  • 5 days Bidet Bonanza: Defying The Toilet Paper Shortage
  • 5 days U.S. Auto Sales Fall By 75%
  • 6 days Violating Quarantine? Big Brother Is Watching
  • 6 days Does Gold Still Have Some Room To Run?
  • 6 days Major Acquisition Gives The World’s First Green Ride-Share Another Edge
  • 7 days U.S. Pushes For Digital Currency For Immediate Stimulus
  • 7 days The Impossible Challenges Created By Growing Population
  • 7 days Gold Skyrockets After Fed Pledges "Unlimited" Cash To Boost Economy
  • 8 days World’s Richest Lose $1 Trillion In Stock Market Rout
  • 8 days Gas Stations Shut Down In Venezuela As Coronavirus Crisis Intensifies
  • 8 days The Best And Worse Case Scenario For The U.S. Stock Market
How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

Ron Paul

Ron Paul

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

House Benghazi Hearings: Too Much Too Late

Last week the US House of Representatives called former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to appear before a select committee looking into the attack on a US facility in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012. The attack left four Americans dead, including US Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.

As might be expected, however, the "Benghazi Committee" hearings have proven not much more than a means for each party to grandstand for political points.

In fact, I would call these Congressional hearings "too much, too late."

Four years after the US-led overthrow of the Libyan government - which left the country a wasteland controlled by competing Islamist gangs and militias - the committee wants to know whether Hillary Clinton had enough guards at the facility in Benghazi on the night of the attack? The most important thing to look into about Libya is Hillary Clinton's e-mails or management style while Secretary of State?

Why no House Committee hearing before President Obama launched his war on Libya? Why no vote on whether to authorize the use of force? Why no hearing after the President violated the Constitution by sending the military into Libya with UN authorization rather than Congressional authorization? There are Constitutional tools available to Congress when a president takes the country to war without a declaration or authorization. At the time, President Obama claimed he did not need authorization from Congress because the US was not engaged in "hostilities." It didn't pass the laugh test, but Congress did next to nothing about it.

When the Obama Administration decided to attack Libya, I joined Rep. Dennis Kucinich and others in attempt to force a vote on the president's war. I introduced my own legislation warning the administration that, "the President is required to obtain in advance specific statutory authorization for the use of United States Armed Forces in response to civil unrest in Libya."

We even initiated a lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia asking the courts to rule on whether the president broke the law in attacking Libya.

Unfortunately we got nowhere with our efforts. When it looked like we had the votes to pass a resolution introduced by Rep. Kucinich to invoke War Powers Resolution requirements on the president for the use of force in Libya, Speaker Boehner cancelled the vote.

Why were there no hearings at the time to discuss this very important Constitutional matter? Because the leadership of both parties wanted the war. Both parties -- with few exceptions -- agree with the ideology of US interventionism worldwide.

Secretary Clinton defended the State Department's handling of security at the Benghazi facility by pointing out that there are plenty of diplomatic posts in war zones and that danger in these circumstances is to be expected. However she never mentioned why Benghazi remained a "war zone" a year after the US had "liberated" Libya from Gaddafi.

Why was Libya still a war zone? Because the US intervention left Libya in far worse shape than it was under Gaddafi. We don't need to endorse Gaddafi to recognize that today's Libya, controlled by al-Qaeda and ISIS militias, is far worse off - and more of a threat to the US - than it was before the bombs started falling.

The problem is the ideology of interventionism, not the management of a particular intervention. Interventionism has a terrible track record, from 1953 in Iran, to Vietnam, to 2003 in Iraq, to 2011 in Libya and Syria. A real Congressional hearing should focus on the crimes and mistakes of the interventionists!

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment