With short interest now at 60+ percent of its float, Lyft has swiftly become a symbol for disastrous post-IPO performance by the latest batch of overvalued tech 'unicorns' all of which are "inexplicably" scrambling to go public all at the same time, almost as if they know what's coming next. But the ride-sharing app's steep drop from the highs reached on the day of its debut hasn't stunted the market's insatiable appetite for the next big lossmaker.
Pinterest has priced more than $2 above the high end of its range ahead of its market debut on Thursday, even as it is forced to share the spotlight with Zoom Video Communications, a company that provides remote conferencing services that also bears the rare distinction of being something known as a "profitable business."
Zoom, whose shares priced at $36 apiece, also generated robust demand. Its bankers raised the expected price range on Tuesday, then its shares priced $1 above that range on Wednesday, valuing Zoom at $10 billion, which, amusingly, is well below Pinterest's $12.6 billion. Moreover, Pinterest reportedly took a 'conservative' tack on its pre-IPO valuation, according to WSJ, even as Pinterest executives sped up the timetable for the IPO to take advantage of a 'hot' market.
Meanwhile, Lyft shares have been slaughtered - they're trading 17 percent below the IPO price - as analysts published a series of downbeat reports (which only confirmed what the market was already telling us).
(Click to enlarge)
However, Pinterest boosts one material advantage over Lyft on the basis of fundamentals (so far as those still matter, anyway). While it's still losing money, at least those losses are narrowing. Though its advertising-dependent model still risks comparisons to floundering Snapchat. Meanwhile, Zoom recently became profitable, and its revenues are rapidly growing. Related: Gold Prices Fall On Record Global Production Estimates
For its fiscal year ending in January 2017, Zoom reported revenue of roughly $61 million. A year later, that more than doubled to over $150 million, then more than doubled again in the year ending January 2019. Its profitability is rare among the recent slew of technology companies coming to the public markets with steep losses.
Pinterest is also growing at a fast clip. And while it isn’t yet profitable, its annual losses are narrowing. Revenue in 2018 totaled $756 million, up from $473 million a year earlier. The company’s net loss narrowed to $63 million in 2018 from $130 million in 2017. Some bank analysts have estimated revenues will grow 30 percent to 35 percent in 2019, one person familiar with the matter said.
But as Pinterest struggles to boost its share of the global advertising pie, the comparisons to Snap appear inevitable. The company's only hope to avoid a similarly disastrous post-IPO streak appears to be keeping its valuation 'restrained' - even as some argue that Pinterest might be positioned to better monetize its advertising business.
Despite Pinterest’s efforts to distance itself from the label of a "social media company", analysts say it can be a useful benchmark for valuation. According to James Cordwell, an analyst at Atlantic Equities, Pinterest is worth as much as Snap, about $16 billion, and could be much more.
"The ability to monetize that audience is much higher," Cordwell said of Pinterest before the pricing. "When you’re at Snap you’re in the business of communicating with friends or wasting time; when you’re going to Pinterest there’s high purchasing intent: you’re planning something, looking for a product. That’s exactly what advertisers are looking for."
But as investors prepare for Pinterest's market debut, they'll be trying to parse what Pinterest's performance might mean for the next round of unicorns, including Palantir, Slack and the long-awaited debut of uber-lossmaker Uber, particularly as the share of loss-maker debuts has now surpassed its previous all-time high, hit during the dot com bubble.
(Click to enlarge)
But if the Pinterest offering does go sideways, buyers can always blame the investment banks selling the stock for any "mistakes made", and sue the Federal Reserve for allowing someone to lose money in the "market."