• 555 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 555 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 557 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 957 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 962 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 964 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 967 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 967 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 968 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 970 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 970 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 974 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 974 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 975 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 977 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 978 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 981 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 982 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 982 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 984 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Ned W. Schmidt

Ned W. Schmidt

Ned W. Schmidt,CFA,CEBS is publisher of THE VALUE VIEW GOLD REPORT and author of "$1,265 GOLD", published in 2003. A weekly message, TRADING THOUGHTS, is…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Commodities
  3. Agriculture

Agri-Equities and Agri-Food Prices: Both Strong

When has food been more valuable than technology? Aside from all of history, that was especially true in 2016. Chart below is our Investment Scoreboard for 2016. In it are portrayed the returns for a variety of important market measures. Gold stocks, Silver, oil, and Agri-Equities clearly owned the year. Agri-Equities, number four in chart, substantially outperformed most of the equity markets. In 2016 food was clearly more valuable than those tired, old, over owned technology and internet stocks as indicated by the NASDAQ 100 being far down in the list.

Investment Scorecard

Commodities clearly were the strength in markets during 2016. As we observed above, that commodities performed substantially better than the NASDAQ 100 is a development that should be especially noted. Consensus view at this time a year ago was to avoid commodities and look to stocks such as those that dominate the NASDAQ 100. The 2016 consensus view was a classic example of why one might want to avoid investing in the consensus.

Agri-Food prices also had a good year. Seeing no reason to argue with a rule that supports our opinion, we accept common view that a 20% or more rise from an important low suggests that a new Agri-Food bull market might be emerging. The Agri-Food Price Index made an important low in first week of October. From that low, the index rose 24% to a new 52-week high. Latest value for that measure is 21% above the low.

Strength is also observable at the individual Agri-Commodity level. The average gain for 18 Agri-Commodities from their respective 52-week lows is 25%. While averages can mask some wide variations in the data, 9 of 18, or 50%, are 20% or more above their 52-week lows. That phenomenon is shown in chart below.

Agri-Food Prices

Why have Agri-Food Prices risen so strongly? While record harvests have occurred in some parts of the world, demand has continued to rise. Demand is a crucial part of pricing, and perhaps too much ignored by many commodity analysts. According to the USDA, during the two years ending in crop year 2017(August), total consumption of grains will have risen by 3.3%, or 83 million tons. That tonnage increase is a third larger than entire U.S. wheat crop. Increased global Agri-Food consumption in any period of time continues, becoming part of the permanent base of consumption to which will be added any future increases.

World Grain Imports

Best measure of expanding demand for Agri-Foods is imports as they represent unmet domestic demand. Imports of wheat, for example, are the difference between domestic consumption and domestic production. Imports are accomplished by purchases in global grain markets from nations producing a domestic surplus. As wheat is not a collectible, nations do not import it unless someone wants to eat it. And note, once a nation is hooked on imported food that will be the situation forever.

In chart to right are portrayed, by crop years, global imports of rough grains, soybean, wheat, and rice. As can be observed, demands on global grain markets have continued to grow. Last bar is our forecast for imports of those grains in 2026.

Most of this expected growth is to come from India, Africa, and other developed nations, as well as China continuing to expand imports. India, due to rapid economic growth, will likely expand imports by 70-80 million tons over the next decade. Food imports of developing nations are growing rapidly as their economies keep developing. Hottest corn import markets are Sub Saharan Africa(#1), Southeast Asia(#2), and North Africa(#4). One of the questions the world will have to answer in the next decade is how the rising demand for food from India and Africa can be met and/or what price will be required to meet that demand.

Diversification remains one of the most powerful tools available to investors. As history has shown, Agri-Commodities should be part of that diversification. As demand for Agri-Commodities is global as people in every country eat each day, total risk of portfolios will be reduced and returns should be enhanced. And note, we have never had to worry about a battery within an apple exploding.

 


Ned W. Schmidt, CFA is publisher of The Agri-Food Value View, a monthly exploration of the Agri-Food grand cycle being created by China, India, Africa, and Agri-Energy. To contract Ned or to learn more, use this link: www.agrifoodvalueview.com @agrifoodvv

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment