• 1,118 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 1,118 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 1,120 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,520 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,525 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,527 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,530 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,530 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,531 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,533 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,533 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,537 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,537 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,538 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,540 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,541 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,544 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,545 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,545 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,547 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Europe’s Great Hydrogen Debate

Europe’s Great Hydrogen Debate

Hydrogen is quickly gaining ground…

Thorium Could Kickstart A New Nuclear Boom

Thorium Could Kickstart A New Nuclear Boom

A meltdown-proof uranium alternative may…

  1. Home
  2. Commodities
  3. Energy

How Much Would It Cost The U.S. To Ditch Fossil Fuels?

Green

Decarbonizing the U.S. grid and replacing fossil fuels with renewables could cost US$4.5 trillion in investments over the next 10 to 20 years, Wood Mackenzie analysts have calculated.

Such a move away from fossil fuels would require the installation of 1,600 GW of new solar and wind capacity, the research firm said. This compares with a total capacity of 1,060 GW across the United States, of which 130 GW renewable capacity.

Yet a lot more generation capacity is not all, either. A lot of utility-scale storage installations would also be necessary to make the power produced by solar and wind farms reliable enough to replace fossil fuels in the long run. More precisely, Wood Mac’s analysts have calculated the storage capacity needed at 900 GW.

This sort of change has no precedent, the research firm said, and would necessitate a complete overhaul of the power generation industry.

"The challenges of achieving 100% renewable energy go far beyond the capital costs of new generating assets. Most notably, it will need a substantial redesign of electricity markets, migrating away from traditional energy-only constructs and more towards a capacity market," said Wood Mac’s head of Global Wind Energy Research, Dan Shreve.

If the complete transformation to a fossil fuel-free U.S. is to be done by 2030, this would mean adding more renewable capacity every year over the next 11 years than has been added over the last 20 years combined.

Yet, there is a middle ground: pushing the all-renewables deadline further into the future and allowing some natural gas capacity in the mix. According to Wood Mac’s analysts, if 20 percent of the energy generated in the U.S. comes from natural gas, this would cut renewable installations costs by 20 percent as well, but it will also help reduce energy storage costs by as much as 60 percent.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment