• 5 hours The Unexpected Retail Segment On Track To Hit $68B
  • 2 days Oil Demand Falters On New Wave Of Lockdowns
  • 3 days Signal, Telegram Gain Ground As Social Censorship Breaks Headlines
  • 4 days Investors Should Be Worried About Tech Stocks
  • 6 days Battle For Market Share Intensifies In COVID Streaming War
  • 8 days Censorship Is Now Private, And That’s Scary
  • 11 days Markets Hit ‘Ignore’ Over Capitol Coup
  • 12 days Tesla’s China Strategy Is Yet Another ReasonTo Double Down
  • 13 days NYSE Reverses China Company Delisting Plans … For Now
  • 15 days The Dollar Could Remain Weak For Years To Come
  • 18 days The Simple Secret To Tesla-Like Gains
  • 19 days US-Listed China Stocks Have 3 Years To Become Transparent
  • 21 days $30,000 Is The New $20,000 For Bitcoin
  • 21 days Gold Slips Following Stimulus Announcement
  • 22 days Illegal Streaming Targeted In The 5,000 Page COVID-19 Stimulus Bill
  • 23 days Big Investors Are Dumping Gold For Bitcoin
  • 24 days The Most Exciting And Strange Energy Tech Of The Year
  • 25 days Morgan Stanley Sees Apple As Major Threat To Tesla’s Dominance
  • 27 days U.S. Lawmakers Pass $2.3 Trillion Relief Package
  • 28 days The Super-Rich Are Investing In “Pandemic Passports"
Why Today’s 300% Oil Price Crash Isn’t As Bad As It Seems

Why Today’s 300% Oil Price Crash Isn’t As Bad As It Seems

In a remarkable and record-breaking…

Who Will Pay For The $40 Trillion Energy Transition?

Who Will Pay For The $40 Trillion Energy Transition?

All the pledges from government…

The Problem With California's Electric Dream

The Problem With California's Electric Dream

California is aiming to ban…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Oilprice.com

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Commodities
  3. Energy

How Much Would It Cost The U.S. To Ditch Fossil Fuels?

Green

Decarbonizing the U.S. grid and replacing fossil fuels with renewables could cost US$4.5 trillion in investments over the next 10 to 20 years, Wood Mackenzie analysts have calculated.

Such a move away from fossil fuels would require the installation of 1,600 GW of new solar and wind capacity, the research firm said. This compares with a total capacity of 1,060 GW across the United States, of which 130 GW renewable capacity.

Yet a lot more generation capacity is not all, either. A lot of utility-scale storage installations would also be necessary to make the power produced by solar and wind farms reliable enough to replace fossil fuels in the long run. More precisely, Wood Mac’s analysts have calculated the storage capacity needed at 900 GW.

This sort of change has no precedent, the research firm said, and would necessitate a complete overhaul of the power generation industry.

"The challenges of achieving 100% renewable energy go far beyond the capital costs of new generating assets. Most notably, it will need a substantial redesign of electricity markets, migrating away from traditional energy-only constructs and more towards a capacity market," said Wood Mac’s head of Global Wind Energy Research, Dan Shreve.

If the complete transformation to a fossil fuel-free U.S. is to be done by 2030, this would mean adding more renewable capacity every year over the next 11 years than has been added over the last 20 years combined.

Yet, there is a middle ground: pushing the all-renewables deadline further into the future and allowing some natural gas capacity in the mix. According to Wood Mac’s analysts, if 20 percent of the energy generated in the U.S. comes from natural gas, this would cut renewable installations costs by 20 percent as well, but it will also help reduce energy storage costs by as much as 60 percent.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment