Despite having a rough summer, with a number of factors pushing gold below $1,200 an ounce (the high dollar, U.S. economic growth, interest rate hikes, booming stock markets), the precious metal appears to be back in favor, with December gold futures closing last Tuesday’s trading at $1,207 an ounce – a two-week high.
In 10 minutes, Bloomberg reported, December gold contracts equal to 1.57 million ounces changed hands on the Comex in New York – almost 12 times the 100-day average volume at that time of day. The catalyst was fresh safe-haven demand owing to political uncertainty in Italy. A government official reportedly said Italy would be better off with its own currency, adding to doubts about the country’s fiscal situation. The EU has to pass Italy’s budget and many think it won’t cut the mustard.
An IMF Financial Statistics Report reveals that Egypt recently bought gold for the first time since 1978, and that India, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines have re-entered the gold market after years-long absences. And Bloomberg reported that the Bank of Mongolia has purchased 12.2 tonnes of gold so far this year.
The World Gold Council believes that many emerging market central banks are turning their attention to gold after years of exposure to the U.S. dollar, and as a natural currency hedge against other reserve currencies. The report maintains that gold is a strategic asset that can help central banks meet tactical objectives, as the international monetary system gradually shifts away from a U.S. dollar-dominated system towards a multipolar one.
While gold slipped under $1,200 on Wednesday, last trading at $1,198.64 at time of writing, it’s a lot better than the major down-leg gold suffered at the end of September, when it dropped to $1,182.30 on September 28. That day gold was at its lowest in six weeks due to US dollar strength, stock market gains and the US Commerce Department reporting that GDP increased at an annual 4.2 percent. Good economic news and a rising dollar are generally bad news for gold, which serves as a flight to safety in times of economic uncertainty.
The US dollar has climbed steadily since April, mostly due to continued buying of US Treasuries – not because other countries are especially confident of the US economy right now (in fact the opposite is true, with the Trump Administration engaged in a protracted trade war with China) – but because there are no other alternatives.
Related: The Fed’s Latest Move Could Be The End Of The Bull Run
On September 24, however, gold and gold miners got an unexpected shot in the arm, in the form of a mega-merger of two gold majors, Canada’s Barrick Gold and Africa-focused Randgold Resources.
Toronto-based Barrick announced it would purchase Randgold for a spectacular $6 billion – putting Barrick on top of the gold producer heap Toronto-based Barrick announced it would purchase Randgold for a spectacular $6 billion – putting Barrick on top of the gold producer heap
Toronto-based Barrick announced it would purchase Randgold for a spectacular $6 billion – putting Barrick on top of the gold producer heapjust as it was about to be shoved off by US-based Newmont Mining. The all-share deal means Barrick shareholders own two-thirds of the company and Randgold the rest.
The merger gives Barrick strength in Africa, a region where Barrick has struggled of late, particularly a tax dispute between its subsidiary, Acacia Mining, and the Tanzanian government which has dragged on for years.
Randgold on the other hand is considered one of the most successful gold producers, delivering a shareholder return of 96 percent over the past decade, led by colorful CEO Mark Bristow. Mining blog Inca Kola News, which apparently broke the merger story according to the Financial Post, posted photos of Bristow dressed in hunting gear with a rifle posing next to dead big game animals.
But maintaining its African projects won’t exactly be like shooting fish in a barrel. As the FP notes, resource nationalism is beginning to rear its ugly head, giving the example of Randgold embroiled in a tax dispute with Mali over its 700,000-ounce Loulo-Gounkoto complex; the Ivory Coast, where a labor dispute threatens production at it 300,000-ounce Tongon mine; and DRC mining code revisions expected to cost the company an extra $20 million per year.
Between them, Barrick and Randgold will produce north of 6 million ounces annually, if they hold to their 2017 outputs. The merged company will own five of the 10 lowest-cost gold mines in the world.
The merger follows earlier M&A in the gold space this year, including the acquisition of Nevada-based producer Rye Patch Gold for $128 million, US silver miner Hecla Mining acquiring Klondex Mines, which has three underground gold mines in Nevada, and the swallowing up of Victoria Gold and its Eagle gold project in the Yukon by Osisko Royalties – which has a 5 percent royalty on the largest gold mine in Canada, Canadian Malarctic.
So why the M&A now? The short answer is, the majors are running out of gold. In an effort to reduce debt, Barrick has been selling non-core assets like a hoarding renter faced with an eviction notice. The company sold off $720 million worth of Nevada properties, including its Ruby Hill Mine and its half of the Round Mountain Mine. Barrick’s reserves have fallen by 54 percent over the last five years, to 64.5 million ounces, states the Globe and Mail.
Related: Mining Deals Are Dwindling
The reasons behind flat-lining/declining gold production are numerous:
• Production declines in mature mining areas
• Slower than expected ramp-ups of output
• Development time up
• The entire resource extraction industry suffers from a lack of skilled people
• Extreme weather
• Labor strikes
• Increasingly more remote and lacking in infrastructure projects
• Higher capex costs
• Increased resource nationalism
• Increased environmental regulation
• More complex metallurgy
• Lower cutoff grades
Gold companies are just now starting to replenish their deposits through acquisitions. A Thomson Reuters report said 2016 was the first year since 2008 that gold mine output actually fell – by 22 tonnes or 3 percent.
South African gold production has plummeted below 250 tonnes compared to 1,000 tonnes in the 1970s, and China, the leading gold producer, is the only country to increase production in recent years.
As for new gold mines, the bear market of 2012 to 2016 meant most large gold companies slashed exploration budgets and small explorers had an extremely tough time raising cash. All of the low-hanging fruit – easy-to-mine gold deposits – have been picked, and what is left is usually remote, deep underground, and expensive to extract.
The experts agree the industry is seeing a significant slowdown in the number of large deposits being discovered. Franco-Nevada co-founder Pierre Lassonde said he doesn’t know how we’ll replace the massive deposits found over the last 130 years.
The big gold miners made some dumb moves at the top of the mining cycle, spending on over-priced mines, putting themselves into debt and causing mine writedowns, then failing to buy cheap assets when the gold price tumbled in 2013 because they were tapped out. The most infamous of these was Barrick’s absurd purchase in 2011 of Equinox Minerals. Hoping to diversify into copper, Barrick paid $7.3 billion for Equinox and its Lumwana copper mine in Zambia, only to write down $4.2 billion two years later. But it wasn’t only Barrick creating shareholder value destruction – the sector incurred $85 billion of write-offs from 2010 to early 2017.
The result has been a lack of gold mining deals despite higher prices. In 2017 the value of gold mining M&A was at its lowest level in 12 years.
So we’ve been due for another round of M&A, and the Barrick-Randgold merger is evidence of the pickle gold mining companies find themselves in having sold so many of their assets or depleted existing ones. But it also adds a brush of excitement to a sector that has seen little signs of life recently.
For more on this subject, read our Unloved gold juniors ripe for the picking
That of course is good news for junior gold explorers with solid projects in safe jurisdictions (not subject to resource nationalism), that could be of interest to a mid-tier or major looking to bump up their gold inventory.
Ore grades are declining. That’s another problem, but also a catalyst for M&A. Bloomberg points outthat the world’s gold reserves have fallen from an average 10 grams a tonne in the late 1960s to just one gram per tonne now. The average reserve grade of the top five gold miners is now 1.12 g/t.
However Randgold has largely been spared the curse of falling grades, mining at over 4 g/t compared to the other four top majors – Barrick, Anglogold, Newcrest and Newmont – who are at 2 grams a tonne and below. This shows that Barrick needs Randgold more than the other way round.
By Rick Mills via Mining.com
More Top Reads From Safehaven.com: