• 3 hours Chinese Stocks Soar On Bullish Economic Data
  • 9 hours Apple’s “Holy Grail Of Data” Leaves Energy Traders Disappointed
  • 11 hours Gold Rally Adds $250 Billion To Top 50 Miners' Market Cap
  • 1 day TikTok Is Becoming A New Battleground For Tech Politics
  • 1 day Peru's Mining Industry Pummeled As Coronavirus Cases Surge
  • 1 day Why The World Is So Divided In Its COVID-19 Response
  • 2 days Equities Cheer Stellar Jobs Report, But It May Be Fleeting
  • 3 days Is Tech Billionaire Peter Thiel Done With Trump?
  • 3 days Musk Takes To Twitter To Troll The SEC
  • 4 days Lunar Mining May Commence As Early As 2025
  • 5 days Immigration Will Go Bust Without $1.2B Bailout
  • 5 days The Economics Of The Space Race
  • 6 days Why The World's Central Banks Aren't Yet Sold On Renewables
  • 7 days How Much More Cash Can Uber Burn?
  • 7 days Inside The Biggest Counterfeit Gold Scandal In Recent History
  • 7 days EU-U.S. Trade Relations Are Deteriorating
  • 8 days Over 184 Companies Have Bailed On Facebook
  • 8 days BP Sells Petrochemical Business For $5 Billion
  • 8 days U.S. Moves To Secure Domestic Rare Earth Supply
  • 9 days E-Commerce Explodes As Boomers Go Digital
Oilprice.com

Oilprice.com

Writer, OilPrice.com

Information/Articles and Prices on a wide range of commodities: We have assembled a team of experienced writers to provide you with information on Crude Oil,…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Commodities
  3. Energy

Hong Kong Billionaire Loses Big On Canadian Energy Play

Sad

While Aramco is signaling that the preparation for its long-awaited IPO is still underway, another big oil company may soon go private. Canada’s Husky Energy has suffered a more than 80-percent drop in its share price in the past decade, according to Bloomberg calculations, and analysts do not believe the outlook is particularly good if it remains a public company.

Oil price fluctuations, the fallout from the 2008 crisis, production cuts, and a failed takeover bid for MEG Energy are some of the reasons why Husky’s stock has lost so much of its value since 2008. For the majority shareholder in the company, a firm controlled by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, this has meant a loss of as much as US$20 billion (C$26.5 billion). Li’s firm has a 69-percent stake in the company.

This, according to RBC Capital Markets analyst Greg Pardy, makes Husky a good candidate for going private. BNN Bloomberg quotes Pardy as saying in a note to clients “If ever there was a time for Husky to consider going private, we believe it is now.” The analyst noted that going private would make Husky more flexible “to differentiate its strategic direction and tactics as need be without public market scrutiny.”

Going private would not be a solution for all of the company’s problems, however, Pardy said. It would close the door to cash-raising through stock offerings, for example, and thus hurt its chances of growing through mergers and acquisitions. It would also make it tough for the majority shareholder to meet the debt obligations that will be maturing in the coming years.

Yet a privatization would, according to Pardy, help it “capture the gap” between its current share price and its net asset value, which the analyst calculates at a much higher level than its current stock price. Related: Africa’s First Unicorn IPO Is Coming To The NYSE

Husky has some pretty attractive assets, including a natural gas field in the South China Sea along with its oil sands operations and its refining business in the United States. Its last financial statement beat expectations in the net profit section, too. Admittedly, this came largely on the back of higher oil prices resulting from the obligatory cuts instituted by the NDP government of Alberta and upheld by the new Conservative government. Still, a better-than-expected profit is good news.

On the bad news front, Husky also reported negative cash flow for the second quarter of the year and an increase in debt. The first-half free cash flow figure was positive but much lower than the figure for the first half of 2018.

“The beauty contest for energy producers these days revolves around free cash flow generation and distributions to shareholders … Admittedly, Husky is not a great fit in this world,” Pardy said in his note. Indeed, free cash flow has become the focus of attention for investors in the energy industry after the price crash of 2014 and few companies are delivering robustly on this metric.

It seems Husky is not particularly attractive for investors right now. Whether going public could help it improve its performance is uncertain, but it may increase its chances. The fact that its share jumped more than 5 percent following the release of Pardy’s note earlier this week suggests that privatization could be a good move.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment